Rwhp
#3
Let's get silly...
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by 91mazdarx7
86-88 Turbo = 182 @ 6500 RPM w/ 183 Ft/lb @ 3500 RPM
That's NOT the RWHP or "Rear Wheel Horse Power"
That is the BHP or "Brake Horse Power"
Brake Horse Power is always less than rear wheel horse power due to driveline losses. Which vary on a number of factors. A rough estimate for a RWD car is ussually 15%.
Thus probably roughly 155 RWHP when it was new.
#5
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RockLobster
That's NOT the RWHP or "Rear Wheel Horse Power"
That is the BHP or "Brake Horse Power"
Brake Horse Power is always less than rear wheel horse power due to driveline losses. Which vary on a number of factors. A rough estimate for a RWD car is ussually 15%.
Thus probably roughly 155 RWHP when it was new.
That is the BHP or "Brake Horse Power"
Brake Horse Power is always less than rear wheel horse power due to driveline losses. Which vary on a number of factors. A rough estimate for a RWD car is ussually 15%.
Thus probably roughly 155 RWHP when it was new.
Trending Topics
#8
Lives on the Forum
No Turbo II is going to hit those numbers as all of them have lots of miles or a much-neglected low mileage motor.
Just knock off 15% for a DynoJet.
Other dyno have different drivetrain loss multipliers.
-Ted
Just knock off 15% for a DynoJet.
Other dyno have different drivetrain loss multipliers.
-Ted
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
10-08-15 10:09 PM