2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

RPM limit of stock ignition

Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #26  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
With a bridge port and the proper carb setup you could theoretically make power over 10k. I know of a person making decent power to 9.5k with a large street port and ITB's, so its can be done. If the engine doesn't have a bridge or larger then it is truly pointless to go much over 9k.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #27  
Shadow102's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eneman to the Rescue
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga
the engine has a j port already so yes it will make power up there. And i am NOT going EFI the whole point of this build is to stay with the Holley 4brl carb setup.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #28  
j200pruf's Avatar
RIP Icemark
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 1
From: Aloha OR
You don't need a j port or a p port to have power up that high. IPRA Race cars in Aus have what quite a few people would consider mild birdge ports and those motors are getting spun to 11K+ and making power. They use radically different intakes than most people on this side of the pacific do.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #29  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
Do you have a special close ratio transmission that was designed to be shifted up that high? If not, give it up. Too many people want to rev higher because more must always be better. It's not most of the time! You need to have your engine and drivetrain match.

The Holley manifold is fantastic for street use but for an engine revving up as high as you want to an IDA setup would be much better and more powerful. No point in revving that high if your setup isn't optimized around it.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #30  
fastrotaries's Avatar
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
SO..how HIGH can you go with stock coils & Igniters. ALL else being Irrelevant!
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #31  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
That's actually a very good question. The stock coils on the 2nd gen are fantastic. I personally would not replace them with anything else as I have yet to see anything else better. This includes coils from MSD, etc. An ignition amplifier might be beneficial but the coils themselves are fantastic units. You need to be careful though with some of the ignition amps as a rotary really likes a big strong initial spark over a short period of time. Many of those boxes give multiple sparks over X number of degrees instead which is great for some engines but not optimal for a rotary, although it does work. If you have a standalone ecu in which you can adjust dwell, you can also get varying results with different rpm limits. Get too greedy on dwell and you'll even fry the coils at low rpms. There are many variables that can affect the overall limit but the coils themselves are actually very good units.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #32  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
What about LS1 coils?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 08:40 PM
  #33  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Actually, the (stock OEM) twin tower wastespark leadings design sucks.
Going with individual coils per leading and firing them simultaneously is superior.


-Ted
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Aug 26, 2015 09:52 PM
Joe428
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
16
Aug 19, 2015 06:24 PM
torky007
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
7
Aug 17, 2015 05:14 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.