2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Problem starting after emissions removal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
GXL like a mofo
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Milton, PA
Problem starting after emissions removal

So I removed emissions on my 86 GXL, and now the bastard won't start. I took out the EGR, ACV, and sub-zero assist while I was under there, as well as the emissions solenoids (rat's nest). I also removed the coolant lines to the intake manifold. I have the vacuum **** on the back of the throttle body capped (that leads to the aux butterflies) but the butterflies are still in place, and the huge hose from teh charge pipe capped as well. What could be causing it not to start? I couldn't find any obvious vacuum leaks, and I (obviously) used gasket maker for the block-off plates. I ran the FPR to the stock location on the dynamic chamber, and have the injector air bleed in the stock location as well. Trailing plugs are fouled, but I can't see that leading to non-starting. Help?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #2  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
after i did the emissions removal, mine flooded out like no tomorrow. Took several full unflood procedure tries to get it started (remove plugs, pull egi fuse, turn over at wot, add oil to plug holes, replace plugs and fuse, try to start)
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 08:48 PM
  #3  
rotary-guy's Avatar
2jz'd fc
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1
From: Washington- bellingham
could be a stupid question but did you acciedently send your fuel line up to the secondary rail and the return from the primary, cause i did (wasnt paying attention) but once swithced to the right way it started right up.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #4  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i still don't get why people remove emissions on n/a's, it just causes more problems then you will net in gains(if any).
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:18 AM
  #5  
My5ABaby's Avatar
Rotaries confuse me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 3
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Originally Posted by Karack
i still don't get why people remove emissions on n/a's, it just causes more problems then you will net in gains(if any).
I had mine removed to avoid problems. I don't need them for my state so why keep around a bunch of parts that have the potential to break? Or vacuum lines that tend to split, etc.?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
GXL like a mofo
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Milton, PA
Originally Posted by Karack
i still don't get why people remove emissions on n/a's, it just causes more problems then you will net in gains(if any).
I didn't do it for any gains. I did it for simplification. Less vacuum lines equals less **** to go wrong (once it's running that is).

gxl90rx7 - I will try unflooding it again with the plugs out, I had just done it with the EGI fuse pulled...

rotary-guy - I put the line from the fuel filter to the primary (upper) rail, and the other line to the secondary (lower) rail.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
GXL like a mofo
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Milton, PA
Any input?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 12:33 PM
  #8  
Richter12x2's Avatar
Taste great, more filling
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
I don't know why but I thought it was in (from fuel filter) at the bottom, out at the top? If this hasn't been solved by now, let me know and I'll go look at mine.

edit: Oh, and the reason I removed my emissions is because $60/pc for each of those 6 solenoids, WITH my discount, is ridiculous. I'm still trying to iron out my car's newfound grievances, but once started, it runs beautifully now without it, I just can't get it to hold an idle yet. :P

Last edited by Richter12x2; Sep 18, 2006 at 12:35 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #9  
stevej88na's Avatar
Strength and Honor
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: CA bay area
lxk 199, you're correct about the filter connecting to the primary rail, but the primary fuel rail is the bottom rail (the one on the engine block), not the top. Here's the proper fuel routing:

"New fuel injection hose is needed. One line runs from the fuel filter to the side of the primary fuel rail facing forward (the side with the pulsation damper). The other end of the primary fuel rail needs to connect to the rear end of the secondary fuel rail (the end without the pressure regulator). Finally, the end of the secondary fuel rail facing forward needs to connect to the fuel return, sticking through the firewall on the driver's side."

That's from this how-to.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
ItsJBohmzB
Build Threads
171
Apr 24, 2017 01:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.