2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Porting the manifolds: Is it worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #1  
10thAEWHiteHeat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Porting the manifolds: Is it worth it?

So I am in the final stages of my build and I have had lots of time to think about extra mods. I have I medium sized street port on an s4 motor pinned with s6 rotors. I am running a bnr stage 2 managed by a microtec lt10. I am shooting for about 330whp. Is it going to benefit me to port the s4 manifolds? If so what will that do for me?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 04:08 PM
  #2  
BuujinBejiita's Avatar
1986 Rx-7
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
I dont know on a rotary but I know on regular piston engines there can be a lot of power to be made from ths. Its not so much the larger ports that gain anything but more of getting out casting flaws. I did it to my 4runner many moons ago and I dont feel I gained much actual power but it smoothed out the whole power band it felt like. Granted my 4Runner only made 150 horse so if I gained lets say 10 I dont feel it would be too noticable. I dont know much about turbo applications either, this may be a whole different story when theres pressure in there rather then vacuum.

Edit; My stock manifolds were terrible looking also, there were burrs all over the insides of the runners and it looked like a 2 piece construction because there was a line the whole lenght that appeared to be where they were put together. Hope this helps
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 10:20 PM
  #3  
bigdv519's Avatar
IFO Forced Induction Slo
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I doubt you gained 10 hp on the 4runner. Not trying to be rude but your example isn't realistic.

For the thread starter, No it is not worth porting your stock manifolds, especially if your horsepower goals are 330hp.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #4  
jgrewe's Avatar
GET OFF MY LAWN
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 2
From: Fla.
There isn't enough wall thickness to do much with. The runner length is the problem for big top end numbers.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 02:12 AM
  #5  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
If you already have the manifold off the car, polish the inside of the runners with a 40 and then maybe an 80 grit sandpaper roll. All the areas after the fuel injectors shouldn't be too smooth because supposedly that hurts atomization of the fuel or something. I'm not sure why that is; it doesn't make sense to me, because one of the main points of fuel injection is to keep fuel droplets from sticking to the walls of the manifold.

As far as reshaping some of the ports, well I don't see much of a gain there because you are just going to introduce a step change, where the diameter gets bigger then smaller again. I wouldn't tear down the engine to the point of removing the manifold just to polish the inside of the runners. That's a lot of work for questionable gain.

The runner length is the problem for big top end numbers.
how do you figure that?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 02:24 AM
  #6  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
A smooth surface will PROMOTE droplets forming in a moving air environment. small imperfections create a layer of turbulence (very small layer) that prevents fuel from forming droplets on the walls of the intake manifold.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 02:56 AM
  #7  
tulok's Avatar
Retard On Two Wheels
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Palmdale CA
Basics of tuned intake runner lenghts
The new R1, aprilia'setc have intake runners that get shorter as the rpms increase.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 06:11 AM
  #8  
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
Who Shot the Sheriff?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 2
From: Aurora, CO
Originally Posted by tulok
Basics of tuned intake runner lenghts
The new R1, aprilia'setc have intake runners that get shorter as the rpms increase.
Mazda did that 20 years ago to win Le Mans.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 06:58 AM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Originally Posted by Monkman33
A smooth surface will PROMOTE droplets forming in a moving air environment. small imperfections create a layer of turbulence (very small layer) that prevents fuel from forming droplets on the walls of the intake manifold.
Fair enough.

Originally Posted by tulok
The new R1, aprilia'setc have intake runners that get shorter as the rpms increase.
The s4 T2 intake manifold has the shortest runners of all the turbo 13B intake manifolds. So clearly there's more going on than just that--the port timing is different than the later engines, and it has the least "lift" in terms of the physical area of the intake port runners. Compare the 13BT to its opposite in terms of design and dimensions, the 13B-RE. The s4 also has a significantly different plenum design than the RE or REW which are better on top end power.

The tuned runner lengths are found on the s5 nonturbo and Rx-8 engines. The VDI system (S5, Rx-8) and variable fresh air duct (Rx-8) have longer and shorter passageways depending on rpm.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 10:27 AM
  #10  
tulok's Avatar
Retard On Two Wheels
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Palmdale CA
Well yes Arghx,
There are multiple contributing factors, not JUST runner length
I think the difference of the ports probably make a lot more difference than the intake manifold simply could, right?
I didn't know the RX-8 or S5 had variable tracts, that's interesting!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2009 | 03:17 AM
  #11  
10thAEWHiteHeat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Thanks for the input guys i dont wanna waste time on anything that is not gonna be worth it.. Done that plenty in my career as a rotorhead already lol! So how bout switching to S5 mani's? I have heard of guys doing an FD manifold but heard it can be complicated. Would staying with the stock S4 manifold be best then?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #12  
nitronatefc's Avatar
Topless, & Barely Legal
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Stevens Point, WI
People have made over 450whp on stock port motors. You have a street port already, and only are looking for 330whp. Leave your manifold alone. There are no worthwhile gains to be had here.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #13  
ericgrau's Avatar
Clean.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
General rule for cutting restrictions: Find the narrowest part and widen that, or if you can't widen it only then do you bother smoothing out the path (make direction change more gradual). The restriction increases dramatically as area decreases. Everything wider will be insignificant by comparison. Like a bottle with a bottleneck.

So look at the ports, see what's as narrow as the ports or in the same ballpark, and worry only about that (if there even is anything that narrow). Even something twice as wide will only be 1/16th as important.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #14  
flaco's Avatar
******
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: miami
s5 lower s6 upper thats it
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #15  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Monkman33
A smooth surface will PROMOTE droplets forming in a moving air environment. small imperfections create a layer of turbulence (very small layer) that prevents fuel from forming droplets on the walls of the intake manifold.
i though tthe main advantage was less air friction with the walls of the manifold. kind of why golf ***** have dimples. air-air friction is less than that of air-metal


i have ported manifolds, but i cant tell much difference. maybe 5%?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #16  
BuujinBejiita's Avatar
1986 Rx-7
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Originally Posted by bigdv519
I doubt you gained 10 hp on the 4runner. Not trying to be rude but your example isn't realistic.

For the thread starter, No it is not worth porting your stock manifolds, especially if your horsepower goals are 330hp.
I highly, highly doubt I gained 10 horse as well. Was just saying the gains are minimal, if any. And to add to that, you never wants a gloss/mirror smooth surface on the intake, you want it semi-rough or the airflow will get 'lazy' and wont acheive very good mixture of the air/fuel. You want it to 'swirl' in the runner.

No, its not worth it, unless you have a crazy ammount of time on your hands. I just happened to have a extra set for my 4Runner, and was out of school working part time and had more time then I knew what to do with any decided to try it. If I could go back I wouldnt have done it and ordered a 5 minute abs workout routine lol.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
Jul 17, 2019 02:20 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 PM.