2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Pacesetter header?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-06, 08:24 PM
  #1  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Comstock Park, MI 49321
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pacesetter header?

OK who has used a pacesetter header? I have the ability to get a new one VERY CHEEP and I am just thinking that it may be worth it to buy the cheepr brand pacesetter n/a header for now over a racing beat because I have a feeling since both are made from mild steel that they stand the same chance of durability etc


any other opinions?

Dave
Old 12-28-06, 08:50 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Noel Caraballo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i had one. had to get rewelded twice. Their welds are crap go for the racing beat one and racing beats is made from stainless it will last longer
Old 12-28-06, 08:52 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Noel Caraballo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wait take that back racing beats is made of mild steel, anywho the quality is better anyways
Old 12-28-06, 08:54 PM
  #4  
Interruptor Illuminada

 
riverzendz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You've seen Pacesetter stuff before, haven't you? I'm not really sure why someone would actually WANT one over a RB piece. Your thinking is way off, no offense.
Old 12-28-06, 10:18 PM
  #5  
Informed Appreciation

iTrader: (1)
 
Hecubus84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Detroit Jr.
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Owning a pacesetter header made me wish that I had just spent the extra 100 bucks and bought the racing beat one.

I think their welder is a 7 year old armless boy, you might as well grind them off and start over. They are that bad.
Old 12-28-06, 10:39 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
mightymite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: southern indiana
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the black paint that there painted with is only good for keepn the rust off during storage and will burn off in a day and start rusting u can sand it down with 120 grit to strip the paint. then paint it with super high temp ceramic paint put a few light layers of paint on then let it cure in the oven at 400 for a few hours with the door open. when u set it in the oven try to let it touch as lil as u can bcs the paint stick after it cures.. so set it on the flanges. the paint should last at least for a while im going on 4 years and they still look good as new
Old 12-28-06, 11:36 PM
  #7  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
Pacesetter makes some junk
Old 12-28-06, 11:39 PM
  #8  
1308ccs of awesome

iTrader: (9)
 
eage8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodbine, MD
Posts: 6,189
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
there has been tests that have shown that the pacesetter headers actually make LESS power than the stock piece. don't even bother with them, it's the crapiest brand of parts out there, I wouldn't even get one for my 89 corolla.
Old 12-29-06, 11:08 PM
  #9  
Rotary $ > AMG $

iTrader: (7)
 
jackhild59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: And the horse he rode in on...
Posts: 3,783
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
The second time I have heard this!??

Originally Posted by eage8
there has been tests that have shown that the pacesetter headers actually make LESS power than the stock piece. don't even bother with them, it's the crapiest brand of parts out there, I wouldn't even get one for my 89 corolla.
Originally Posted by adrock3217
Actually - Pacesetter headers are dyno proven to LOOSE horsepower :-)

Yay!
Originally Posted by jackhild59
Assuming you mean that pacesetter headers reduce the horsepower output, can you provide dyno's or other links to confirm this statement?

I think it is important to know some specific details about this issue.

Thanks!
I challenged this last time and I will again. I am not disagreeing with the statement because I don't have direct knowledge, just asking for proof that this is not an old-wives tale.

In the general interest of the board and for promoting the budget modding of RX7s everywhere, links, please!
Old 12-29-06, 11:36 PM
  #10  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
pacesetter is POO!

I don't know about actually LOSING horsepower over the stock manifold, you'll probably gain lots of power especially 2-3 weeks after install when the welds break and you have a /very/ open exhaust!
Old 12-29-06, 11:37 PM
  #11  
All Rotor

 
chano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, we need some proof on thoses , pacesetter makes less hp claims. I got one when i got the car so i would like to see if this is really true.
Old 12-30-06, 08:09 AM
  #12  
Alot Of Work!

iTrader: (1)
 
7droptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have had pace setter on many of my cars and yes the paint is shitty but i have had none of the other problems that are eluded to here .
Old 12-30-06, 08:22 AM
  #13  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
mightymite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: southern indiana
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 7droptop
i have had pace setter on many of my cars and yes the paint is shitty but i have had none of the other problems that are eluded to here .
yep i second that if anything it would make your car faster just because u dont have 50lbs of cast iron bolted to the side of the engine but i dont see how i could be any worse then stock
Old 12-30-06, 08:26 AM
  #14  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Comstock Park, MI 49321
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well I figured it out and the pacesetter header is 1/16" steel where the racing beat is 1/8" so yeah I sguess I will go with racing beat if I get a header
Old 12-30-06, 02:49 PM
  #15  
Back from the dead...

 
Drifter101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just do yourself a favour and invest the money into the RB Setup. You wont be dissapointed
Old 12-30-06, 03:09 PM
  #16  
Rallye RX7

iTrader: (11)
 
fidelity101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MI/CHI
Posts: 2,403
Received 92 Likes on 55 Posts
pacesetter is more like rustsetter
Old 12-30-06, 03:57 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
dsmrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: GUAM, USA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually. it's more like "Pace *******."
Old 12-30-06, 04:57 PM
  #18  
Full Member

 
Bison Asko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have had the Pacesetter on my s4 for 2 years and its rusted but the wields are holding up. I am planning on replacing it with a RB header. I noticed an improvement over the stock manifold but i lost a little bit of low end power. If i could do it over again i would go RB.
Old 12-31-06, 05:17 PM
  #19  
Who are you?

 
jgrts20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CenCal
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have one and its been 4 years going on 5 with NO issues. Ive had it cherry red a few times also. I think its pretty durable. I have no rust on it neither, its powdered coated. BUT I only drive it in the summer.
Old 12-31-06, 08:36 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Noel Caraballo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
racing beat told me you only get good gains if your going carb setup
Old 12-31-06, 08:39 PM
  #21  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Comstock Park, MI 49321
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah I may just keep the stock manifold I am not sure yet!
Old 12-31-06, 09:49 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Noel Caraballo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i did the racing beat downpipe for the n/a, a borla xr1 muffler about twenty inches long with 2 1/2 inch flanges as a midpipe ,then to the corksport cat back and i love it. Sounds awsome
Old 01-01-07, 12:08 AM
  #23  
rx-for-my-7

iTrader: (1)
 
NJGreenBudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,206
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
I have had both. On my '88 GXL NA, I had the stock first, then swapped to PaceSetter. I actually liked it, now I didn't have any other exhaust mods, just the header so it was probably different than running it with open or aftermarket cat back. I thought it sounded great, really cool sound effects, mild when crusin but she screamed when you opened her up. Yeah, the paint burnt off but I never had a problem with the headers, dirtcheap too.
I don't believe those claims of less horsepower from installing these headers. maybe that was due to something else such as vehicle maintenence or human error,,,,,my car felt wonderful with these headers installed. I would like to see the adata that supports these claims.

On my '87 TII I have the racing beat downpipe, I like it alot. It looks nice, though is turniong kinda grey by the turbo. It is thicker and didn't rust right away like the pacesetter, the tone is bearable, i think i have a small exhaust leak anyways, so... Both are probably better with stock, certainly much much lighter anyways.

I'd probaly buy the pacesetter if u really want it now, or just save until you can afford the RB one, either way, good luck and drive safe.
Old 01-01-07, 12:40 AM
  #24  
Retired Moderator, RIP

iTrader: (142)
 
misterstyx69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 114 Posts
I have BOTH also..the PaceSetter is Lighter than the Racing Beat header,weight wise..I haven't Swapped out yet,but I can say that I have not Encountered any Problem with the PaceSetter header.SURE it gets friggin Cherry Red sometimes!..you would too!,If you were made that Thin,but Hell For the Price,It is a Step up from Stock!..and Isn't that the Over-all Opinion around here?..that ANYTHING is better than Stock?..
Old 01-01-07, 07:40 AM
  #25  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Comstock Park, MI 49321
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well I would like to go to supercharged or turbo charged eventually so I would hate to drop 1000.00 into exhaust and in a year or so either get trid of the car or swap the exhaust for a turbo setup u know.

Dave
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
08-06-17 01:41 PM



Quick Reply: Pacesetter header?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.