2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

N/A Tramsmission Question. Need help...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-07, 02:30 PM
  #1  
Renown Garage

Thread Starter
 
DefinitiveJux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
N/A Tramsmission Question. Need help...

Hey everyone. I need to replace the transmission in my 91' NA. I was wondering if there are any differences between the S4 and S5 N/A tranmissions.

Thanks,
Andrew
Old 10-25-07, 02:50 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Don49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orrtanna,Pa
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The rear mounts are different. If you use the S4 trans you just need tyo use the S4 mount.
Old 10-25-07, 03:18 PM
  #3  
Chicken Adobo

iTrader: (6)
 
kungfuroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the s5 na transmissions had a slightly better cruising ratio
Old 10-25-07, 04:06 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Well the S5's had a slightly taller 5th, which lowers cruisong rpm's, but it also means you'll have to shift more for going up hills since there'll be less torque at the wheel to push you up.
Old 10-25-07, 04:36 PM
  #5  
Rotary $ > AMG $

iTrader: (7)
 
jackhild59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: And the horse he rode in on...
Posts: 3,783
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Well the S5's had a slightly taller 5th, which lowers cruisong rpm's, but it also means you'll have to shift more for going up hills since there'll be less torque at the wheel to push you up.
Yes, but on the other hand the S5 had just about that much more torque, so it was pretty much a non-issue in regards to the generation change; this only comes into play if you had an S4 n/a and you were changing to an S5 tranny. I bet you couldn't really tell the difference even then.

It would only show on the really sensitive butt-dyno. Would probably not really affect gas mileage unless you spend lots of time at highway speeds in 5th.

I would pick which ever ranny that was in the best condition, lowest miles and cheapest price. I would buy 'quality' first in your replacement. Don't worry too much about the ratio, it's not really a big issue

Last edited by jackhild59; 10-25-07 at 04:41 PM.
Old 10-25-07, 04:54 PM
  #6  
Renown Garage

Thread Starter
 
DefinitiveJux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I can toss a S4 transmission in my car and it'll be totally straightforward. I just need to use the S4 tranny mount as well?
Old 10-25-07, 05:01 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Don49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orrtanna,Pa
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes
Old 10-25-07, 11:38 PM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I suppose, but I've got a ~0.800 5th in my car and it makes a noticable difference, it's a lot more eager to pull up hills and it's not even really worse on milage.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
10-01-15 11:53 PM
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
09-26-15 07:28 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM



Quick Reply: N/A Tramsmission Question. Need help...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.