2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

N/A Tramsmission Question. Need help...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #1  
DefinitiveJux's Avatar
Thread Starter
Renown Garage
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Garden Grove, CA
N/A Tramsmission Question. Need help...

Hey everyone. I need to replace the transmission in my 91' NA. I was wondering if there are any differences between the S4 and S5 N/A tranmissions.

Thanks,
Andrew
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #2  
Don49's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 278
Likes: 1
From: Orrtanna,Pa
The rear mounts are different. If you use the S4 trans you just need tyo use the S4 mount.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #3  
kungfuroy's Avatar
Chicken Adobo
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
From: City of Angels
the s5 na transmissions had a slightly better cruising ratio
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Well the S5's had a slightly taller 5th, which lowers cruisong rpm's, but it also means you'll have to shift more for going up hills since there'll be less torque at the wheel to push you up.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:36 PM
  #5  
jackhild59's Avatar
Rotary $ > AMG $
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 30
From: And the horse he rode in on...
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Well the S5's had a slightly taller 5th, which lowers cruisong rpm's, but it also means you'll have to shift more for going up hills since there'll be less torque at the wheel to push you up.
Yes, but on the other hand the S5 had just about that much more torque, so it was pretty much a non-issue in regards to the generation change; this only comes into play if you had an S4 n/a and you were changing to an S5 tranny. I bet you couldn't really tell the difference even then.

It would only show on the really sensitive butt-dyno. Would probably not really affect gas mileage unless you spend lots of time at highway speeds in 5th.

I would pick which ever ranny that was in the best condition, lowest miles and cheapest price. I would buy 'quality' first in your replacement. Don't worry too much about the ratio, it's not really a big issue

Last edited by jackhild59; Oct 25, 2007 at 04:41 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #6  
DefinitiveJux's Avatar
Thread Starter
Renown Garage
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Garden Grove, CA
So I can toss a S4 transmission in my car and it'll be totally straightforward. I just need to use the S4 tranny mount as well?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #7  
Don49's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 278
Likes: 1
From: Orrtanna,Pa
Yes
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #8  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
I suppose, but I've got a ~0.800 5th in my car and it makes a noticable difference, it's a lot more eager to pull up hills and it's not even really worse on milage.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 PM
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 26, 2015 07:28 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM.