2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

me vs b18b CRX??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Bay area
me vs b18b CRX??

i have a 91 TII with a K&N drop filter and running full boost and good compresion well somebody wants me to race this B18B CRX with headers,exhaust,intake,ecu and i thinks thats it. just to shut him up. what do u think my odds are of winning??

-Neil
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Washington
....

ok...your odds should be that your car should be a low14s to high 13s.....um.....my odds are you car should be able to kill that ....or else hes on the bottle then no help there brother....

takashi
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 03:27 PM
  #3  
rx_7_driver's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, Louisiana
wondering that to, except i have a 90 vert, only real mod is cone filter, and custom made air box,gutted cats, i still have the 3.9 gearing from when it was an auto

-Shawn
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 03:52 PM
  #4  
Dvst8's Avatar
Going for the win
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 950
Likes: 21
From: Vancouver
oh this is a hard one......your odds of winning......100% unless you lack driving skills. haha
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #5  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
ummmm I guess no one here knows too much about hybrids eh? A stock 91 t2 with a cone filter migh pull mid 14's. A b18b in a 2000 pound crx with I/H/E should be quicker than that. Race and find out.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 04:12 PM
  #6  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Re: ....

Originally posted by I_love_shoua
ok...your odds should be that your car should be a low14s to high 13s...
At stock TII is low 15's, high 14's.
A K&N drop-in is only going to subract a second in their commercials, lol...
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 04:32 PM
  #7  
Bridgeported's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: -
Well the CRX should weigh anywhere from 2000-2200 lbs with that engine swap depending on if he saved a bit of weight here or there or left it stock other than the engien. If it's a B18[u]b[/bu] that means it's only 140 hp at the flywheel!!! . Throw in say 20 hp for his exhaust and intake and ecu combo... so 160 @ flywheel = 140 at the wheels.
2225 lbs (including driver) & 140 rwhp = 14.60 1/4 mile.
****!!!
You should walk all over him.... unless he has a B18C, then dont' be suprised if he walks on you!!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 05:40 PM
  #8  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
I used to be a honda guy before I fell in love with the t2. With I/H/E on a b18b in a crx I would NOT be surprised to see it touch high 13's on drag radials. Let's say crx man is the average driver I still don't see it running anything higher mid-low 14's. Which like it or not is going to be faster than a t2 with a cone intake. Throw on a downpipe/midpipe combo and it's a whole different story.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #9  
striker^rx7's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, Ca
a good pal of mine has a CRX with a similar swap thinks that a B18B CRX with headers,exhaust,intake,ecu should be running low 14's - high 13's depending on how good of driver is in the CRX, so looks like it should be pretty close.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 05:58 PM
  #10  
Bridgeported's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: -
Ok, so my calculations say 14.60.. .that's assuming a pro driver. Everyone suggests an average of low 14's.
So basically everyone here is in agreement his car should be in the low 14's. (possibly slightly more, possibly slightly less... but low 14's).

Now the question is, can a TII in excellent condition and a K&N filter low 14's? Hard to say... but I doubt it.
If stock is 15.25 (give or take 0.10) then I don't see a K&N dropping a second off the 1/4 mile time. Maybe take him down to mid-14's.

Am I right or what? Of course!!
The race should come down to which driver is better.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 06:19 PM
  #11  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
I know a kid with a CRX, the interior completely gutted and the same motor swap. He ran a 14.5 at the track with close to those mods.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #12  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by Bridgeported
Ok, so my calculations say 14.60.. .that's assuming a pro driver. Everyone suggests an average of low 14's.
So basically everyone here is in agreement his car should be in the low 14's. (possibly slightly more, possibly slightly less... but low 14's).

Now the question is, can a TII in excellent condition and a K&N filter low 14's? Hard to say... but I doubt it.
If stock is 15.25 (give or take 0.10) then I don't see a K&N dropping a second off the 1/4 mile time. Maybe take him down to mid-14's.

Am I right or what? Of course!!
The race should come down to which driver is better.
The panel filter would be worth around 2 hp, if that. the restriction is not in the stock filter, but in the filter box.

The TII, if driven properly, will run 15 flat. You would lose this race.
Now, if you had full exhaust, it would be another question...
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 06:34 PM
  #13  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
I think you'll win. Why dont you try and let us know
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 06:48 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Ontario , Bradford
A stock S5 TII should get a 14.5 to 15 flat stock. If you cant get into the 14's on a properly running S5 TII u cant drive or ur car isnt running properly. I pulled a 15.1 with a slipping clutch and a cone filter. That was my first time at the track to. I would of been in the 14's but I screwed up on third (dont laugh) because my shifter bushings are SHOT and I still ran a 15.2 when I mis shifted. My trap speed for the 15.1 was 94mph.

Id wait till you get full exhaust before racing him just incase cuz you never know how good of a driver he is.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #15  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
I've never had the pleasure of riding in a T2. However i have taken a ridee in 86 CRX with those same mods, and completely stripped interior, i must say i was very impressed.

Torque steer like a bitch tho.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 07:16 PM
  #16  
Bridgeported's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: -
Originally posted by Gecko_7
A stock S5 TII should get a 14.5 to 15 flat stock. If you cant get into the 14's on a properly running S5 TII u cant drive or ur car isnt running properly. I pulled a 15.1 with a slipping clutch and a cone filter. That was my first time at the track to. I would of been in the 14's but I screwed up on third (dont laugh) because my shifter bushings are SHOT and I still ran a 15.2 when I mis shifted. My trap speed for the 15.1 was 94mph.

Id wait till you get full exhaust before racing him just incase cuz you never know how good of a driver he is.
Put down the bong!!! (ps - I'm serious!!)
It's EXTREMELY rare to find someone who tested a 100% stock TII in the 14's. Look at almost any car testing source, or magazines, or whatever, and they will almost always have it in low 15's.
The accepted number is 15.2 or 15.3.
I don't know how you ran 15.1 on a stock TII with slipping clutch and only a cone filter. Are you sure that wasn't your MPH
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 07:40 PM
  #17  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by Bridgeported


Put down the bong!!! (ps - I'm serious!!)
It's EXTREMELY rare to find someone who tested a 100% stock TII in the 14's. Look at almost any car testing source, or magazines, or whatever, and they will almost always have it in low 15's.
The accepted number is 15.2 or 15.3.
I don't know how you ran 15.1 on a stock TII with slipping clutch and only a cone filter. Are you sure that wasn't your MPH
Agreed. There is no way you are a better driver than the professionals who test stock cars, lets be serious. 14.9 is the BEST I have seen from any stock test, and this achieved with run after run, beating the car to death.

A cone filter is not stock, it replaces a huge engine restriction. This makes your run negligible.
Can we see the timeslip, too?

And one more question.... why are you pushing a car at the track if you know it is not functioning correctly? Slipping clutches create a huge amount of heat which stresses the flywheel and clutch disk. It creates cracks in the flywheel surface, and the heat creates a HUGE possibility of the clutch overheating and letting go, not to mention the slippage creates a huge possiblity of the RPMS skyrocketing and pegging the fuel cut.
Jesus, buddy. Either you're lying, or completely negligent to your car.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 07:28 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Ontario , Bradford
Originally posted by scathcart

A cone filter is not stock, it replaces a huge engine restriction. This makes your run negligible.
Can we see the timeslip, too?

And one more question.... why are you pushing a car at the track if you know it is not functioning correctly? Slipping clutches create a huge amount of heat which stresses the flywheel and clutch disk. It creates cracks in the flywheel surface, and the heat creates a HUGE possibility of the clutch overheating and letting go, not to mention the slippage creates a huge possiblity of the RPMS skyrocketing and pegging the fuel cut.
Jesus, buddy. Either you're lying, or completely negligent to your car.
Ill get my buddy to scan the slip, And makin a few runs at the strip with a clutch that slips(not alot but enough to make a difference) isnt going to harm anything, im not puttin down 400hp here, soo you can relax. Its only when I go into second gear to it slips a bit then it grabs and Im not going to be runnin lean when my car only has a Cone intake and my clutch slipped about 300-400rpm then grabed.

And ill put down my bong when I feel like puttin it down, for now its not going anywhere.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 07:30 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Ontario , Bradford
Oh yeah some one has a old car and driver magazine or something and they tested a 14.7 . I have to find it lemme search.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 07:33 AM
  #20  
Bridgeported's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: -
Exactly... 1-2 people out of 10,000 managed to get a 14.XX time out of a stock TII. Does that mean a stock TII runs 14.XX ? HELL NO!!!!!
I'm not even going to comment on this thread anymore. This reminds me of the lounge
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 08:01 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Ontario , Bradford
buddy you need to relax man, people are just stating what they have experienced or seen other people get.

Why do i need to lie, I dont give a damn who believes me or not im just sayin what I have encountered. Dont go and say Im wrong when I know perfectly well what I ran at the track and I said u should pull those numbers I didnt say every single TII will get those numbers.
Kinda like the LS1's some camaro's ran high 13's some ran low 13's some even hit high 12's. I guess it all depends.

Anyway u have my opinion on the matter.

Good day
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 12:22 PM
  #22  
Infini IV's Avatar
Microtech Tuning!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: 626 Socal
Ah the internet...
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 12:24 PM
  #23  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
The final line is: a stock or near stock t2 with just a cone filter is going to fall prey to the b18b crx with I/H/E. If you disagree with me, then I guess ignorance is bliss. Go race and find out. Like I've already said, swap out for a 3'' dp/mp combo and it's a whooooole different story.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
O 16581 72452 5
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
18
Oct 9, 2003 04:12 AM
Manntis
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Apr 20, 2003 02:10 AM
Multiplex
Old School and Other Rotary
29
Sep 21, 2002 08:49 PM
AcmeSkater
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
11
Jan 2, 2002 06:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.