intake upgrade
intake upgrade
wtf i cant belive i cant find anyone who wants to upgrade thier intake pipe. come on that intake before AFM is tiny. PLEASE can any one help me either tell me a replacement AFM from another car or that is bigger than stock. i wrote this because suprisingly i cant find anything about what or how to upgrade the intake on a 1990 intake system.
Im pretty new to Mazda's and their flap door air flow meter. But other cars use hot wire MAF's. You wont be able to convert to another system of reading intake flow without major ecu changes.
A bigger intake might be better, but having your sensor work properly matters more
A bigger intake might be better, but having your sensor work properly matters more
Originally Posted by pyroal188
MORE IS BETTER
https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/help-air-sensor-635318/
Or search for any of the numerous others on the topic.
-Rob
Trending Topics
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 24
From: Columbia, Tennessee
an NA doesnt suck in enough air to make a difference. im sure upgrading to a larger AFM would increase slightly but for the money your shelling out.... just put a cone filter on it. a turbo on the other hand would show a decent increase.
The stock AFM has good enough air flow, I can assume you aren't even making that much power. You can replace the intake pipe with a larger one, using a bit of ingenuity with a pipe and couplers. If you really want to eliminate the stock AFM, you need to get a full standalone. All depends on your price budget.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 24
From: Columbia, Tennessee
the intake pipe is what.. 3.5 inches? thats plenty for a 1.3 liter engine. the AFM inlet shows a slight bit of restriction being only about 2x3 inches. you wont notice any difference in upgrading to a 3-3.5 inch AFM unless your turbo or ported maybe.
Originally Posted by pyroal188
MORE IS BETTER
Originally Posted by pyroal188
i wrote this because suprisingly i cant find anything about what or how to upgrade the intake on a 1990 intake system.
so, lets say on a S4 T2, its impossible to remove the AFM ??
so id have to mount my Apexi filter with the adapter to that big *** AFM ???
why did mazda didnt go with a normal MAF instead ?? it really needs the flapper??
if anyone has pictures of their CAI , could you post it here please.
only a standalone would "cure" the fact of running with a removed AFM, or would something like the S-AFC II would do ???
i have a hks pfc f-con & im waiting for my rtek v.2.0
and probably a tuning with steve kan next time he comes in Montreal.
so id have to mount my Apexi filter with the adapter to that big *** AFM ???
why did mazda didnt go with a normal MAF instead ?? it really needs the flapper??
if anyone has pictures of their CAI , could you post it here please.
only a standalone would "cure" the fact of running with a removed AFM, or would something like the S-AFC II would do ???
i have a hks pfc f-con & im waiting for my rtek v.2.0
and probably a tuning with steve kan next time he comes in Montreal.
Originally Posted by got_boost
so, lets say on a S4 T2, its impossible to remove the AFM ??
so id have to mount my Apexi filter with the adapter to that big *** AFM ???
why did mazda didnt go with a normal MAF instead ?? it really needs the flapper??
if anyone has pictures of their CAI , could you post it here please.
only a standalone would "cure" the fact of running with a removed AFM, or would something like the S-AFC II would do ???
i have a hks pfc f-con & im waiting for my rtek v.2.0
and probably a tuning with steve kan next time he comes in Montreal.
so id have to mount my Apexi filter with the adapter to that big *** AFM ???
why did mazda didnt go with a normal MAF instead ?? it really needs the flapper??
if anyone has pictures of their CAI , could you post it here please.
only a standalone would "cure" the fact of running with a removed AFM, or would something like the S-AFC II would do ???
i have a hks pfc f-con & im waiting for my rtek v.2.0
and probably a tuning with steve kan next time he comes in Montreal.
An AFM is, among other things, a device that calculates how much air you are sucking in, and tells the ECU how much fuel to deliver to the engine. An SAFC2 tricks the ECU into adding extra fuel...can you understand why this WOULDN'T allow you to eliminate the AFM..?
If you want to eliminate the AFM, which should, in all honesty be the last reason why you are doing this, get a standalone EMS.
Originally Posted by pyroal188
(1990 N/A)
so i geuss its not worth upgrading unless i want to waste a good some of money for little power increase.
ill stick to upgrading the ignition and exhaust for now
so i geuss its not worth upgrading unless i want to waste a good some of money for little power increase.
ill stick to upgrading the ignition and exhaust for now
Upgrading the ignition past new wires and plugs is a waste of time too. The ignition system is pretty stout. Especially for NA power levels.
exhaust, either RB downpipe or header plus catback, lose the cat (unless you have an S4) open element air filter with decent shielding, lightened flywheel, and weight reduction are going to net you the best gains without opening the engine to port it.
BC
Originally Posted by got_boost
if anyone has pictures of their CAI , could you post it here please.

Originally Posted by got_boost
im waiting for my rtek v.2.0
Originally Posted by anewconvert
exhaust, either RB downpipe or header plus catback, lose the cat (unless you have an S4) open element air filter with decent shielding, lightened flywheel, and weight reduction are going to net you the best gains without opening the engine to port it.
BC
BC
The only other upgrade that I perceive to be worthwhile on an N/A seems to be the Pineapple Sleeves. Will get around to that eventually. Secondary throttle plate removal seems worthwhile as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





