2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Intake choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #1  
IBMX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Grimshaw, Alberta
Intake choice

Hello,
I was wondering about what people run for intakes and what seems to get the best results in terms of air flow. I have been told to go with an apexi intakes but im looking for more opinions. Also is a mass air necessary? or can it be deleted without harm to the engine? Sorry for the newb questions.

Bobby
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
marshall13B's Avatar
Apprentice Tech.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, Wa
I went straight from my stock set up to a K&N, removed emissions, and put in a new clutch all in one blow so I saw a lot of improvment.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #3  
MmSadda's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, OH
Unless you're doing significant modifications to an n/a, or other noteworthy modifications to a turbo, it's really not productive to buy an intake. However, if you DO feel the need to do one, do what I did and buy a cone filter, cold air box, and vented headlight cover.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #4  
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
Who Shot the Sheriff?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 2
From: Aurora, CO
K&N drop in.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
Boosted11's Avatar
Pistons are gay
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC
Drop a K&N in, along with some sort of snorkel or passage for cold air to enter the engine bay close to the intake. Don't do the vented headlight cover, those don't do **** I heard.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #6  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
Just do a drop in if you really feel the need. I fabbed up a custom air box for a cone filter awhile back, and ended up just taking it all out. There's no power gain, and it created small hesitations at partial throttle. If you do go cone, you have to keep the AFM. The only way to get rid of it is with a standalone EMS.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:24 PM
  #7  
IBMX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Grimshaw, Alberta
Well I did the throttle body mod (removal of secondary throttle plates) to a spare throttle body and that would go in shortly after the intake if I did get one. Would the combination of both intake be noticable. I know the throttle body mod causes hesitation in low rpm but thats why you learn pedal control right?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by IBMX
I was wondering about what people run for intakes
People run all kinds of intakes. Most of them are no better than the stock intake, and some are actually worse.

Originally Posted by IBMX
what seems to get the best results in terms of air flow.
A bell mouth inlet has the best subsonic airflow.

Originally Posted by IBMX
I have been told to go with an apexi intakes but im looking for more opinions.
Apexi is good. I prefer K&N, as do most of the professional racers. The stock filter is fine too. Just stay away from the cheapie imitation performance filters because some of them tend to fall apart and get ingested into the engine.

Originally Posted by IBMX
Also is a mass air necessary? or can it be deleted without harm to the engine?
The air flow meter (AFM) is necessary to tell the engine's computer how much fuel to inject. The engine will not work with the AFM removed unless you install a rather expensive and complex standalone engine management system or carburetor kit. I do not recommend getting rid of the AFM unless you are willing to spend a lot of time and money on your car.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #9  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by IBMX
Well I did the throttle body mod (removal of secondary throttle plates) to a spare throttle body and that would go in shortly after the intake if I did get one. Would the combination of both intake be noticable. I know the throttle body mod causes hesitation in low rpm but thats why you learn pedal control right?
The TB mod has no real power gain either. The only reason to get rid of the extra set of secondary plates is the clear up some of the clutter in the engine bay.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #10  
AUGieDogie's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 4
From: seattle
I love my apex-i intake. Itbolts on very very solid. One of these days I will get around to building a sheild/box for it to use the factory inlet over the rad shroud.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 11:16 PM
  #11  
IBMX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Grimshaw, Alberta
Yes I am aware its not of great power gain but I am not looking for that just better flow. That is why I was looking into intakes for better flow. I read somewhere that a stock rx7 air box was quite restrictive. Would the hisitation increase with both intake and throttle body?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 02:51 AM
  #12  
AUGieDogie's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 4
From: seattle
The s4 box is supposed to be quite restrictive, so a cone would help with the airflow, S5 is a much better design so a cone wont effect the airflow as much on that.
Of course then you get the cone sucking in hot air is worse for the engine argument...................
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #13  
IBMX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Grimshaw, Alberta
i didn't know there was a difference between the s4 and s5 airboxes?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
HKSpoweredFC3S's Avatar
Custom User Title
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
I just went with the HKS reloaded intake. Works very well. The foam material is much better.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2008 | 04:56 AM
  #15  
AUGieDogie's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 4
From: seattle
Originally Posted by IBMX
i didn't know there was a difference between the s4 and s5 airboxes?

Yes, the s4 has a square hole, the s5 has a nice round one.

If my camera batt was dead, as allways, i post a pic for you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
Oct 14, 2015 12:31 PM
sinistersam
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Sep 13, 2015 07:17 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.