OK, I've heard that it is not possible to remove the OMP from my 89 TII since it's electric and the ECU has to see it there. I've read the archives, and it is mentioned; but I want to see if anyone has had ANY success at tricking the ECU with some resistors in circuit? My OMP is out, and I have it mostly removed; but the damn CEL keeps throwing every 11 minutes and limping the girl out.... Is there any solution to this?

 

I have heard of people leaving the old omp hooked up to the wiring but not hooked up to the oil lines. This lets the ECU thihk it is working.

 

there is a lot more involved that just a resistor. There is a position sensor and flow controller that needs to be adapted.

 

Its a fairly complicated feedback control loop. I've solved it for S5 NA, S5 TII is in the works. This involves chipping the ECU to remove the code related to OMP operation. Visit www.pocketlogger.com for details

-Henrik

 

Damn you've come quite a ways since I last heard. I owned the rtek 1.7 and loved it. but back then you only had it for the s4tII, glad to see your going to be selling to everyone now! Congrats on the great "creative engineering"

 

Fundamentally easy to do for anyone familiar with microcontroller circuits. Datalog the inputs and outputs to the pump, and program a microcontroller to emulate them.

No one has bothered though since used parts are available as a cheap replacement.

 

LIke HENRIK said, Pocketlogger MAKES a cure for the removal of the OMP on a series FIVE. It's been on the market for almost a year.

 

Thanks alot fellas! That's step two once I get the water pump replaced!
Hooray for RX-7's and their constant tuning!!!!

 

But wait a second.... I'm not an electrical engineer.... Guess I've just got to wiat for Henrik, or get a new OMP. Anyone have one for a s5 TII sittin around for sale?

 

Henrik collaborates with PocketLogger at : http://pocketlogger.com/?pid=rtek7&t...age=1&ecu=S5NA


Wait a minute, the shot collaborators after the second WW, didn't they? humor

 

right, right, i saw that. But Iv'e got a TII..... is this going to work if it specifies N/A?