2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

how much rwhp can these support?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #1  
7Drift2Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
ANBU
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Norcal
how much rwhp can these support?

how much rwhp can each of these components support up to within a margin of safety? im not talking about how much hp it can make for 2 dyno runs and then blowin the motor, but how much "safe" rwhp can it support.

-stock TMIC
-S4 turbo ECU
-S4 turbo fuel system (injectors, fuel pump, etc)
-S4 stock turbo (and also what psi before it becomes ineffcient)
-S5 stock turbo (and also what psi before it becomes ineffcient)

im a n00b, came from a world of piston engines. everyones gotta start somewhere right?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #2  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
I'd say 210whp limited mostly by the fuel system. You are limited to the fuel cut boost level unless you get an FCD and going past that without some fuel mods is not really a good idea. :/
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #3  
MountainTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Utah (land of mountains)
The previous owner of my car dynoed the car with the stock S4 turbo, stock TMIC, Fuel cut defender, exhaust, stock fuel system, and an SAFC. He got 215 RWHP on 8lbs of boost.

The car currently has 167,000miles on it and is still running strong (knocks on wood). Since he dynoed it, I have put on an S5 turbo and manifold and installed an EBC. I usually run 6-8psi around town, and up it to 8-10 for those rare race/auto-x occasions.

Don't know if that helps, but it's one example. (215 reliable RWHP, probably more HP now).
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 01:19 PM
  #4  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
i've heard anywhere from 12 to 14psi is the stopping point for the turbo (not efficiant)
deffinatley what rx7guy said is right, that is your main limmitation. If you where to get at least a larger fuel pump you would be good until you upgraded your turbo. The ecu is a good question but hopefully I will be making about 310-320rwhp with my setup on stock ecu with rtek 1.7 chip and safc.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #5  
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
@ pipnorcali
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Grass valley, ca
i've seen with a walbro, 269rwhp @ 12psi
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 01:42 PM
  #6  
OverDriven's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by hondahater
i've heard anywhere from 12 to 14psi is the stopping point for the turbo (not efficiant)
deffinatley what rx7guy said is right, that is your main limmitation. If you where to get at least a larger fuel pump you would be good until you upgraded your turbo. The ecu is a good question but hopefully I will be making about 310-320rwhp with my setup on stock ecu with rtek 1.7 chip and safc.

Why are you running an S-AFC with the R-Tek 1.7? Are you running larger than 720cc secondaries?

-Joe
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #7  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
nah just when I do get a wideband I will fine tune with it. I'm pretty pissed I don't have a wideband now but my money and my honey won't allow it also another reason I want an safc is because i don't think I've ever heard of the rtek 1.7 and an upgraded turbo so it may run a little lean because its not a stock turbo. Who knows. Short answer for safty.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #8  
7Drift2Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
ANBU
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Norcal
thanks guys for the replies...i have no intentions on keeping the FC stock. i was just curious to know the limitations of the components. i have a to4e 57 trim going in so im sure i have to upgrade the fuel system and go with a front mount ic.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 12:29 AM
  #9  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by SDrotary-FC
i've seen with a walbro, 269rwhp @ 12psi
With stock fuel injectors and a walrbo you saw 269rwhp?
That dyno doesn't happen to be posted on the net does it?

The reason I ask is my t2 with stock cleaned injectors/walrbo @ 11psi maxxed out the fuel system, car hit a brick wall, injectors stock open, haltech said 120% duty cycle...
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts



Last edited by Turblown; Oct 19, 2004 at 12:35 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 12:42 AM
  #10  
Infini IV's Avatar
Microtech Tuning!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: 626 Socal
Originally Posted by 1Revvin7
With stock fuel injectors and a walrbo you saw 269rwhp?
That dyno doesn't happen to be posted on the net does it?

The reason I ask is my t2 with stock cleaned injectors/walrbo @ 11psi maxxed out the fuel system, car hit a brick wall, injectors stock open, haltech said 120% duty cycle...
120%? That's not possible...

But since he only mentioned the Walbro, I wouldn't doubt that car had bigger injectors. And as we all know, the proper 255lph Walbro can flow enough fuel to support up to 400hp.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 12:46 AM
  #11  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by Infini IV
120%? That's not possible...

But since he only mentioned the Walbro, I wouldn't doubt that car had bigger injectors. And as we all know, the proper 255lph Walbro can flow enough fuel to support up to 400hp.

Its not possible, that what was needed out of those injectors.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:52 AM
  #12  
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
@ pipnorcali
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Grass valley, ca
yea it was on stock inj. and a s5 turbo, i don't have a dyno sheet though (it was'nt my car)
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 12:33 PM
  #13  
OverDriven's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by SDrotary-FC
yea it was on stock inj. and a s5 turbo, i don't have a dyno sheet though (it was'nt my car)

I believe it, but I don't think the turbo or the engine will last long like that.

-Joe
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #14  
Infini IV's Avatar
Microtech Tuning!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: 626 Socal
Originally Posted by SDrotary-FC
yea it was on stock inj. and a s5 turbo, i don't have a dyno sheet though (it was'nt my car)
That would put the injectors past 95% duty cycle. In any case, I don't doubt it happened with a stand-alone EMS, since you never mentioned whether the car is still running fine and the injectors are still fine. With the stock ECU, I'm unsure, since I thought I remembered that the stock ECU will only drive the primary injectors up to ~60%-ish max duty cycle... which would mean not enough fuel.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #15  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by SDrotary-FC
yea it was on stock inj. and a s5 turbo, i don't have a dyno sheet though (it was'nt my car)
Was this on stock ecu too?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 10:55 PM
  #16  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Infini IV
I thought I remembered that the stock ECU will only drive the primary injectors up to ~60%-ish max duty cycle... which would mean not enough fuel.
Not true. Stock ECU doesn't care about duty cycle.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:11 AM
  #17  
OverDriven's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by scathcart
Not true. Stock ECU doesn't care about duty cycle.
Eh? Thats not true from what I've read. The ECU has a cap off to the duty cycle, though I believe its closer to 80%.

-Joe
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #18  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
yes it does, thats why on the rtek chip they increase it by 5 percent.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #19  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by Infini IV
That would put the injectors past 95% duty cycle. In any case, I don't doubt it happened with a stand-alone EMS, since you never mentioned whether the car is still running fine and the injectors are still fine. With the stock ECU, I'm unsure, since I thought I remembered that the stock ECU will only drive the primary injectors up to ~60%-ish max duty cycle... which would mean not enough fuel.
Myth, the stock ECU will drive them without limitations...the limit is the size, not DC.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:34 AM
  #20  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
I'm confused then why does the rtek increase it by 5%?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Oct 8, 2015 10:09 PM
Sh00bs
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 PM.