2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

dual intercooler setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #1  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
dual intercooler setup

anyone ever done it

as in a front mount used in junction w/ the stock topmount?

im thinkin bout doin it but wanted some feedback beforehand

thanks
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #2  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
First of all, any system that retains the stock TMIC is less than ideal as it heat soaks terribly and will serve as a bottle neck in the system since its pretty worthless at higher than stock CFM levels.

Where do you plan to mount this second IC? How will the piping be routed?

Seems like by the time you run all the extra piping to connect the two, you will have as much (if not more) piping as a more efficient FMIC system. (which will be even more than a V-mount.

Im also pretty sure running dual IC's would increase pressure drop as well.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #3  
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
Who Shot the Sheriff?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 2
From: Aurora, CO
The front mount will cool the air then the top mount will heat it back up.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #4  
TitaniumTT's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by Turbo II Rotor
The front mount will cool the air then the top mount will heat it back up.
That's exactely what I was going to say.

Originally Posted by sharingan 19
Seems like by the time you run all the extra piping to connect the two, you will have as much (if not more) piping as a more efficient FMIC system. (which will be even more than a V-mount.
So are you saying that an FMIC is more effiecent than a VMIC? Would you care to back that up with proof or is this just more interenet hearsay from someone who really has no proof or knowledge?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #5  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
ahhh ok i was going to run it on the right side but i see now that the TMIC acts more as a heater than cooler. scratch that idea then

Question 2:

how can i route the piping so i can keep my accessories?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:50 PM
  #6  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
If you can get a FMIC w/ not many bends and most connections welded, it would be more efficient than a Vmount seeing as it is directly in the airstream, with no restictions, the only reason someone would do a Vmount is because of how much less piping there is so less pressure drop but it is more efficient than a TMIC
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:53 PM
  #7  
Juiceh's Avatar
Saiga-12 Power!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,385
Likes: 2
From: N of Chicago
Originally Posted by TitaniumTT
That's exactely what I was going to say.
LoL me 2!


Originally Posted by TitaniumTT
So are you saying that an FMIC is more effiecent than a VMIC? Would you care to back that up with proof or is this just more interenet hearsay from someone who really has no proof or knowledge?
I think he means that the FMIC will have more piping than the FMIC.


Originally Posted by duhafnusa4
If you can get a FMIC w/ not many bends and most connections welded, it would be more efficient than a Vmount seeing as it is directly in the airstream, with no restictions, the only reason someone would do a Vmount is because of how much less piping there is so less pressure drop but it is more efficient than a TMIC
I think you will find that most people who have done FMIC and gone to VMIC have found the VMIC to not only be more responsive due to the lack of piping but when properly ducted with a vented hood it may also be more efficient.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
hmm, i was suggesting if the body was stock(aka no vented hood or ducting)
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #9  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Juiceh

I think he means that the FMIC will have more piping than the FMIC.
Reading comprehension FTW
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #10  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
anyone have a link to a cost effective/good FMIC/VMIC kit?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #11  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by sharingan 19
Im also pretty sure running dual IC's would increase pressure drop as well.
Yes

Originally Posted by Turbo II Rotor
The front mount will cool the air then the top mount will heat it back up.
No

Originally Posted by duhafnusa4
anyone have a link to a cost effective/good FMIC/VMIC kit?
The stock intercooler is the most cost-effective.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #12  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
ha

at what psi does it become inefficient to use the stock TMIC?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 02:14 AM
  #13  
MDD0101's Avatar
slowmotion
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: Hamden, Ct
anything past 12psi...i myself wouldnt go past 10psi
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #14  
Tofuman FC3S's Avatar
Like a G6
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: In the Dutch Mountains
it would be more efficient than a Vmount seeing as it is directly in the airstream, with no restictions
A VMIC in combination with a well vented hood will result in a lot more pressure difference (in front and behind IC) than a FMIC with a radiator mounted behind it ever could. This way a VMIC will have much more air passed through the IC... frontal area is not that important, since you don't want the air to hit the IC and stay there, you want it to pass through and make room for more air going the same route.

Riz.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 08:54 AM
  #15  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
dual intercoolers is pointless unless you have twin, non sequential turbos.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #16  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
im already running 10 so i guess a FMIC is due
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #17  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
ha so im gettin a free FMIC from a buddy woot!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #18  
TitaniumTT's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by Juiceh
LoL me 2!
Great minds I guess

Originally Posted by Juiceh
I think you will find that most people who have done FMIC and gone to VMIC have found the VMIC to not only be more responsive due to the lack of piping but when properly ducted with a vented hood it may also be more efficient.
That being said a VMIC withOUT a ducted hood would probably be as effiecent as a FMIC but still more responsive because of the lack of miles of piping. There is at least one member here running a VMIC with no dropvented hood and he has ZERO problems with IAT's. In fact, just to put an end to all this internet garbage I'm going to do some datalogging and dyno pulls with a stock hood, a drop vented hood and no hood just so we can have some actual data becuase this is certainly not the first nor will it be the last time this was asked.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 03:41 AM
  #19  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Great idea! can't wait to see the results.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #20  
duhafnusa4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Boone, NC, 28607
nice!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.