Differences in TII models between the years
#1
No rotary, no problems?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Differences in TII models between the years
Well, now that I know for sure that I want to start with a turbo car when I build up a RX-7, I'm wondering what all the differences were between the years. I know of the usually differences between the S4 and S5 models like the bumpers, trim, tailights, mirrors, wing, rims, engine, and interior. The S5 had the better plastics on the interior that didn't crack as easily, and had the nicer seats and door panels, along with different style gauges, idiot light setup, logicon, and the optional cargo cover. The engine had the same irons and housings, but had stronger internals allowing it to rev higher and higher compression rotors as well as a different turbo. I don't remember if the intake and exhaust manifolds were setup the same though. Also, I believe the tranny was different, but the driveshaft, differential, and axles were the same. I do remember some people saying the S4 had a stronger drivetrain though, wasn't sure if there was any truth to this. IIRC, the 87-88 TII had the "heavy duty" suspension, whereas the other years just had the regular TII suspension setup. All TII's had the same brakes though IIRC. Anything to add to this to aid in my finding a TII?
#3
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
S4 TII has different manifolds, and different turbo/mani. It also has a 7.62 5th gear, while the S5 has a 7.19 5th gear. S4's have a clutch type LSD, and S5's have a viscous. Suspension was the same for all models.
#5
No rotary, no problems?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea, I knew about the twin-scroll system and the electronically controlled wastegate. I never knew the manifolds were different, but I did know the turbo was different because of the twin-scroll system. I didn't know that about the 5th gear on the tranny though. Basically, the 5th gear on the S5 will save you more gas mileage because it'll run at a lower RPM, but if you're looking for acceleration, the S4 is going to be better in 5th gear. The tranny thing isn't a big deal considering this car will be built for speed, not gas mileage. I forgot about the different rear-end types, but I knew the viscous type differential was better. I was told the 87-88 had the "heavy duty" suspension, but the other TII's had the standard TII suspension by Ice Mark. Never knew that about the CPU speed, but I did hear about the changes with the AFM. The gas tank thing isn't a big issue either, considering I only fill half full to get better gas mileage anyways. Now, how many of these parts are swappable? I'm sure the rear-ends are swappable. Could I put the better turbo and manifold setups on a S4? What about swapping the CPU and AFM?
#6
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Yea, I knew about the twin-scroll system and the electronically controlled wastegate. I never knew the manifolds were different, but I did know the turbo was different because of the twin-scroll system. I didn't know that about the 5th gear on the tranny though. Basically, the 5th gear on the S5 will save you more gas mileage because it'll run at a lower RPM, but if you're looking for acceleration, the S4 is going to be better in 5th gear. The tranny thing isn't a big deal considering this car will be built for speed, not gas mileage. I forgot about the different rear-end types, but I knew the viscous type differential was better. I was told the 87-88 had the "heavy duty" suspension, but the other TII's had the standard TII suspension by Ice Mark. Never knew that about the CPU speed, but I did hear about the changes with the AFM. The gas tank thing isn't a big issue either, considering I only fill half full to get better gas mileage anyways. Now, how many of these parts are swappable? I'm sure the rear-ends are swappable. Could I put the better turbo and manifold setups on a S4? What about swapping the CPU and AFM?
Here's a diagram for the AFM swap.
#7
No rotary, no problems?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you mean by the clutch type being more predictable? That's good to hear the intake manifolds, exhaust manifold, and turbo are all direct swaps from S5 to S4. Good to see the AFM is pretty easily to swap also. Are the S5 manifolds just a better flowing design? I'm guessing the CPU isn't swapable? Here it is quoted from Mark:
Sorta Right...
The complete heavy duty suspension was found only on the
86-87 Sport
87-88 Turbo
88 GTU
88 Convertible
But parts of the heavy duty suspension also found on the
86-88 GXL
89-91 Turbo
89-91 convertible
The 89-90 GTUs used the same exact suspension as all the other 89-91 non turbo coupes. The GTUs only used the 89-91 Turbos wheels and brakes.
So why would they only use the heavy duty suspension on the S4 and just parts of it on other models?
Sorta Right...
The complete heavy duty suspension was found only on the
86-87 Sport
87-88 Turbo
88 GTU
88 Convertible
But parts of the heavy duty suspension also found on the
86-88 GXL
89-91 Turbo
89-91 convertible
The 89-90 GTUs used the same exact suspension as all the other 89-91 non turbo coupes. The GTUs only used the 89-91 Turbos wheels and brakes.
So why would they only use the heavy duty suspension on the S4 and just parts of it on other models?
Trending Topics
#8
No rotary, no problems?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, how is the clutch type LSD more predictable and are the CPU's swapable between the S4 and S5? Anything to back up the S4 drivetrain being stronger?
#9
No rotary, no problems?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright, so for the full list of differences:
Exterior:
Bumpers
Trim
Tailights
Mirrors
Wing
Rims
Gas tank
Suspension:
S4 had the "heavy duty" suspension
Engine:
Stronger rotor bearings
Higher compression rotors
Twin-scroll turbo
Electronically controlled wastegate
Manifolds
AFM
CPU
Drivetrain:
Transmission (S4 had stronger synchros)
LSD
Flywheel
Interior:
Better plastics
Seats
Door panels
Gauges
Idiot light setup
Logicon
Optional cargo cover
Exterior:
Bumpers
Trim
Tailights
Mirrors
Wing
Rims
Gas tank
Suspension:
S4 had the "heavy duty" suspension
Engine:
Stronger rotor bearings
Higher compression rotors
Twin-scroll turbo
Electronically controlled wastegate
Manifolds
AFM
CPU
Drivetrain:
Transmission (S4 had stronger synchros)
LSD
Flywheel
Interior:
Better plastics
Seats
Door panels
Gauges
Idiot light setup
Logicon
Optional cargo cover
#10
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Because the lock up was force proportionate, where as a Viscous LSD needs to see an amount of slippage for the fluid to harden
CPU's (body computers) are not interchangeable between series and the ECU's (engine computers) are also not interchangeable between series.
Because consumers were complaining that the Heavy duty suspension was too heavy duty. The S5 models are much more softer and isolated feeling when driving down the road (as that was the direction the market was going in the late 80's).
actually the S5 plastics are worse and tend to crack out more often... much cheaper construction, and the optional cargo cover was standard on some S5 models and of course optional as a dealer available option on any FC (regardless of series).
The dealer option S4 cargo cover is actually a much better design than the S5, as the S4 could be taken apart and folded in half in case you needed the extra space.
CPU's (body computers) are not interchangeable between series and the ECU's (engine computers) are also not interchangeable between series.
The dealer option S4 cargo cover is actually a much better design than the S5, as the S4 could be taken apart and folded in half in case you needed the extra space.
Last edited by Icemark; 06-14-07 at 07:42 PM.
#14
Boost in..Apex seals out.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Maryland, 21794
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Rotorhead in the making.
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another major difference is the OMP. In the S4 it is mechanical but in the S5 the Ecu controls the OMP. So even if do manage to plug in the s5 computer in an s4(you can't because they are different plugs) the car won't run properly because of the OMP. I don't even think an s4 can turn on with an s5 computer.
#17
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
The S5 coupes also had a much smaller arm rest glove box and no sport arm rest option.
#22
No rotary, no problems?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright, so to revise the list:
Exterior:
Different front bumper
Different rear bumper
Different side mouldings
S5 had round tailights, S4 had square ones
S5 had rounder mirrors, S4 had square ones (both had option for aero type mirrors)
Wings were different between series, and depended on which model you had
Rims were different bweteen series, and depended on which model you had
S5 had 18.5 gallon tank, S4 had 16 gallon
Suspension:
S4 had the heavy duty suspension, and S5 just had parts of it
Engine:
S5 had a lighter rotating assembly (better for higher RPM power)
S4 had a heavier rotating assembly (better for lower RPM power)
S5 had stronger rotor bearings
S5 had higher compression rotors, which were lighter and slightly weaker
S5 had twin-scroll turbo
S5 had an electronically controlled wastegate
S5 had better flowing manifolds
S5 used the more efficient plunger-type AFM
S5 used a faster processing ECU
Mechanical OMP on S4, computer controlled on S5
Drivetrain:
S5 had a different 5th gearing with more ribs on the external case, and had weaker synchros than the S4
S5 had viscious type LSD, whereas S4 had clutch type (personal choice which is better)
S5 had a synchromesh reverse gear
S5 used a lighter flywheel
Interior:
S5 had rubberized radio/logicon surround (tend to crack more often)
S5 had rubberized shifter surround (tend to crack more often)
Seats
Door panels
Gauges
Idiot light setup and surround
Logicon
S5 had a standard cargo cover on some models, but the deal option cargo cover for the S4 was a better design
S5 had a smaller arm rest
S5 had a smaller glove box
S5 had no sport arm rest option
Wasn't the idiot light surround also rubberized on the S5? And what do you mean by smaller arm rest and no sport arm rest option?
Exterior:
Different front bumper
Different rear bumper
Different side mouldings
S5 had round tailights, S4 had square ones
S5 had rounder mirrors, S4 had square ones (both had option for aero type mirrors)
Wings were different between series, and depended on which model you had
Rims were different bweteen series, and depended on which model you had
S5 had 18.5 gallon tank, S4 had 16 gallon
Suspension:
S4 had the heavy duty suspension, and S5 just had parts of it
Engine:
S5 had a lighter rotating assembly (better for higher RPM power)
S4 had a heavier rotating assembly (better for lower RPM power)
S5 had stronger rotor bearings
S5 had higher compression rotors, which were lighter and slightly weaker
S5 had twin-scroll turbo
S5 had an electronically controlled wastegate
S5 had better flowing manifolds
S5 used the more efficient plunger-type AFM
S5 used a faster processing ECU
Mechanical OMP on S4, computer controlled on S5
Drivetrain:
S5 had a different 5th gearing with more ribs on the external case, and had weaker synchros than the S4
S5 had viscious type LSD, whereas S4 had clutch type (personal choice which is better)
S5 had a synchromesh reverse gear
S5 used a lighter flywheel
Interior:
S5 had rubberized radio/logicon surround (tend to crack more often)
S5 had rubberized shifter surround (tend to crack more often)
Seats
Door panels
Gauges
Idiot light setup and surround
Logicon
S5 had a standard cargo cover on some models, but the deal option cargo cover for the S4 was a better design
S5 had a smaller arm rest
S5 had a smaller glove box
S5 had no sport arm rest option
Wasn't the idiot light surround also rubberized on the S5? And what do you mean by smaller arm rest and no sport arm rest option?
#24
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Interior:
S5 had rubberized radio/logicon surround (tend to crack more often)
S5 had rubberized shifter surround (tend to crack more often)
S5 had rubberized radio/logicon surround (tend to crack more often)
S5 had rubberized shifter surround (tend to crack more often)
Idiot light setup and surround
Logicon
S5 had a smaller glove box
Wasn't the idiot light surround also rubberized on the S5? And what do you mean by smaller arm rest and no sport arm rest option?
The Sport Arm rest was a $50 or so S4 option that was a triple height arm rest in the center console. This allowed you to rest your elbow easier without leaning.
#25
No rotary, no problems?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea Icemark, I'm basically speaking of the turbo differences here. Guess I'll revise my list.
Exterior:
Different front bumper
Different rear bumper
Different side moldings
S5 had round tailights, S4 had square ones
S5 models came standard with the rounder aero mirrors, The only the 88 GTU, 88 Convertible and 88 Turbo model had a version of the aero mirrors.
Wings were different between series, and depended on which model you had
Rims were different between series, and depended on which model you had
S5 had 18.5 gallon tank, S4 had 16 gallon
Suspension:
S4 had the heavy duty suspension, and S5 just had parts of it
Engine:
S5 had a lighter rotating assembly (better for higher RPM power)
S4 had a heavier rotating assembly (better for lower RPM power)
S5 had higher compression rotors, which were lighter and slightly weaker
S5 had twin-scroll turbo
S5 had an electronically controlled wastegate
S5 had better flowing manifolds
S5 used the more efficient plunger-type AFM
S5 used a faster processing ECU
Mechanical OMP on S4, computer controlled on S5
Drivetrain:
S5 had a different 5th gearing with more ribs on the external case, and had weaker synchros than the S4
S5 had viscious type LSD, whereas S4 had clutch type (personal choice which is better)
S5 had a synchromesh reverse gear
S5 used a lighter flywheel
Interior:
S5 had rubberized radio/logicon surround (cracked less often than the S4)
S5 had rubberized shifter surround (cracked less often than the S4)
Seats
S5 had some dash and trunk pieces liked to crack more often than the S4 pieces
Door panels
Gauges
88 and S5 models had the Visor'd idiot light surround.
88 and S5 models had the blacked out look idiot light setup. They looked simular but had different icons and wired differently
86-87 models had a different idiot light setup than the S5 models
Sticker on the logicon
S5 had a standard cargo cover on some models, The S4 models had the dealer option cargo cover which was a foldable design
S5 had a smaller arm rest glove box interior due to the mouse belts.
S5 did not have the flocked interior on the glove box, from the S4 GXL and Turbo II models
S5 had no sport arm rest option (triple height arm rest)
Alright, I think that should about do it. I can't really think of anything else.
<moderators note= I got tired of explaining the differences so I just edited the bigger flaws>
Exterior:
Different front bumper
Different rear bumper
Different side moldings
S5 had round tailights, S4 had square ones
S5 models came standard with the rounder aero mirrors, The only the 88 GTU, 88 Convertible and 88 Turbo model had a version of the aero mirrors.
Wings were different between series, and depended on which model you had
Rims were different between series, and depended on which model you had
S5 had 18.5 gallon tank, S4 had 16 gallon
Suspension:
S4 had the heavy duty suspension, and S5 just had parts of it
Engine:
S5 had a lighter rotating assembly (better for higher RPM power)
S4 had a heavier rotating assembly (better for lower RPM power)
S5 had higher compression rotors, which were lighter and slightly weaker
S5 had twin-scroll turbo
S5 had an electronically controlled wastegate
S5 had better flowing manifolds
S5 used the more efficient plunger-type AFM
S5 used a faster processing ECU
Mechanical OMP on S4, computer controlled on S5
Drivetrain:
S5 had a different 5th gearing with more ribs on the external case, and had weaker synchros than the S4
S5 had viscious type LSD, whereas S4 had clutch type (personal choice which is better)
S5 had a synchromesh reverse gear
S5 used a lighter flywheel
Interior:
S5 had rubberized radio/logicon surround (cracked less often than the S4)
S5 had rubberized shifter surround (cracked less often than the S4)
Seats
S5 had some dash and trunk pieces liked to crack more often than the S4 pieces
Door panels
Gauges
88 and S5 models had the Visor'd idiot light surround.
88 and S5 models had the blacked out look idiot light setup. They looked simular but had different icons and wired differently
86-87 models had a different idiot light setup than the S5 models
Sticker on the logicon
S5 had a standard cargo cover on some models, The S4 models had the dealer option cargo cover which was a foldable design
S5 had a smaller arm rest glove box interior due to the mouse belts.
S5 did not have the flocked interior on the glove box, from the S4 GXL and Turbo II models
S5 had no sport arm rest option (triple height arm rest)
Alright, I think that should about do it. I can't really think of anything else.
<moderators note= I got tired of explaining the differences so I just edited the bigger flaws>
Last edited by Icemark; 06-19-07 at 08:57 PM.