2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Differences in TII models between the years

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-07, 04:45 PM
  #26  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The S4 also had the twin scroll turbo system.
Old 06-19-07, 04:47 PM
  #27  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
13b4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 8,789
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedOfLife
but the S5's have round translucent tail light lenses vs the rectangular of the S4's.
Not technically a "body line" though.
Old 06-19-07, 09:22 PM
  #28  
No rotary, no problems?

Thread Starter
 
Ice_Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the corrections Icemark. Now I can finally make my decision on which model to look for specifically.
Old 06-19-07, 10:30 PM
  #29  
Tire Smoken Tandm Gambler

 
V8slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Eau Claire Wisconsin
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Icemark is having a hay-day with this thread
Old 06-21-07, 11:10 AM
  #30  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
kleetuz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: West Los Angeles
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 13b4me
Not technically a "body line" though.
No not a body line, its just that, well it's all opinion and preference, the square tail lights match the sharp body lines of the car better than the translucent round lights, and if the trim is painted to match the color of the car it looks even better. But there are some things you get with the s5 that look better also, like how the different front bumper matches the sharp edges of the rest of the car better than an s4 where it's kind of bland in comparison.

And I would say for 3rd gens that round tail lights match the body lines better than the squarish ones.
Old 06-21-07, 11:57 AM
  #31  
Burning up Time

 
The Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
actually the S5 plastics are worse and tend to crack out more often... much cheaper construction,.
Tell me about it,you have to be especially carefull taking off any plastic parts on a S5.
and the optional cargo cover was standard on some S5 models and of course optional as a dealer available option on any FC (regardless of series).

The dealer option S4 cargo cover is actually a much better design than the S5, as the S4 could be taken apart and folded in half in case you needed the extra space.
The S5 cover tends to buckle in the middle of the cover at the pivot end and then becomes a pain in the ***.It's made from some pressed/molded cardboard with a covering or something along those lines.
Old 06-21-07, 12:01 PM
  #32  
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (10)
 
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marysville, CA
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S5's have the automatic seatbelts which always breaks down but has a lifetime warranty.

I own both a red s4 t2 and blue s5 t2. I gotta say that I will pick my S5 anyday, hands down. People think my S5 is a mid 90s car and it turns heads all the time. The S5 looks better and has more power. Just about everyone thinks so. But I got to admit, I hated the S4 look, until I finally bought an S4 T2. And now I like the look, but maybe because its pretty clean and most s4s are pretty junky. I do think that without the stock S5 wing, the car looks like its missing something. I'll probably leave the S4 body stock but with the S5 wing. Oh yea, the s4s are a lot cheaper. I have bought 2 running red s4 t2s with minor problems for $1000. While I have bought 2 S5 t2 rolling chassis for $2000. So price is a big thing.
Old 06-27-07, 10:39 AM
  #33  
No rotary, no problems?

Thread Starter
 
Ice_Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exterior:
Different front bumper
Different rear bumper
Different side moldings
S5 had round tailights, S4 had square ones
S5 models came standard with the rounder aero mirrors
88 GTU, Convertible, and Turbo II models had an aero version of the S4 mirrors
Wings were different between series, and depended on which model you had
Rims were different between series, and depended on which model you had
S5 had 18.5 gallon tank, S4 had 16 gallon

Suspension:
S4 had the heavy duty suspension, and S5 just had parts of it

Engine:
S5 had a lighter rotating assembly (better for higher RPM power)
S4 had a heavier rotating assembly (better for lower RPM power)
S5 had higher compression rotors, which were lighter and slightly weaker
S5 had twin-scroll turbo
S5 had an electronically controlled wastegate
S5 had better flowing manifolds
S5 used the more efficient plunger-type AFM
S5 used a faster processing ECU
Mechanical OMP on S4, computer controlled on S5

Drivetrain:
S5 had a different 5th gearing with more ribs on the external case, and had weaker synchros than the S4
S5 had viscious type LSD, whereas S4 had clutch type (personal choice which is better)
S5 had a synchromesh reverse gear
S5 used a lighter flywheel

Interior:
S5 had rubberized radio/logicon surround (cracked less often than the S4)
S5 had rubberized shifter surround (cracked less often than the S4)
Seats
S5 had some dash and trunk pieces that liked to crack more often than the S4 pieces
Door panels
Gauges
S5 had the automatic seatbelts
88 and S5 models had the visor'd idiot light surround
88 and S5 models had the blacked out look idiot light setup which looked similar to the S4 version but had different icons and wired differently
86-87 models had a different idiot light setup and surround than the S5 models
Sticker on the logicon
S5 had a standard cargo cover on some models
S4 models had the dealer option cargo cover which was a foldable design
S5 had a smaller arm rest glove box interior due to the mouse belts
S5 did not have the flocked interior on the glove box
S4 GXL and Turbo II models had the flocked interior on the glove box
S5 had no sport arm rest option (triple height arm rest)

That should be all the differences. It's nice to finally see what's available for the different series. Now, another hard question. What exactly is swapable between the two series?
Old 06-27-07, 11:14 AM
  #34  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Ice_Wolf
Engine:
S5 had a lighter rotating assembly (better for higher RPM power)
S4 had a heavier rotating assembly (better for lower RPM power)
S5 had higher compression rotors, which were lighter and slightly weaker
S5 had twin-scroll turbo
S5 had an electronically controlled wastegate
S5 had better flowing manifolds
S5 used the more efficient plunger-type AFM
S5 used a faster processing ECU
Mechanical OMP on S4, computer controlled on S5
Originally Posted by My5ABaby
The S4 also had the twin scroll turbo system.
.
Old 06-27-07, 01:17 PM
  #35  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm pretty sure the S5 TII DIDN'T have the twin scroll system, whereas the S4 TII did.
Old 07-09-07, 01:07 PM
  #36  
No rotary, no problems?

Thread Starter
 
Ice_Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, now that I know the differences, I can truly decide if I want to search for a S4 or S5 and what the differences are and what I can swap.
Old 07-09-07, 01:24 PM
  #37  
Caramelldansen

 
Dinnercoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,182
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as current subjective differences go, an S5 TII will be a lot harder and more expensive to acquire than an S4 TII.

Which is why I'm converting my GXL, kekeke...

Last edited by Dinnercoat; 07-09-07 at 01:24 PM. Reason: tee hee hee hee
Old 07-09-07, 02:08 PM
  #38  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by MHopkins
As far as current subjective differences go, an S5 TII will be a lot harder and more expensive to acquire than an S4 TII.
my experience also indicates that's true, but since every used car is different anyway, meh
Old 07-09-07, 02:13 PM
  #39  
Caramelldansen

 
Dinnercoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,182
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedOfLife
my experience also indicates that's true, but since every used car is different anyway, meh
Well given comparable condition cars, and the owners have an idea for their value, then the S5 will always cost more. Esp if in good condition.
Old 07-10-07, 10:39 AM
  #40  
No rotary, no problems?

Thread Starter
 
Ice_Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with you guys about the S5 being harder to find and more expensive, but the choice is always out there.
Old 07-10-07, 01:48 PM
  #41  
My FCs' are 5 foot pretty

 
JinZemog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The S5 TII has a "completely independent twin-scroll" turbo. This is why the exhaust manifolds are different. The two rotors exhaust ports were separated and hit the turbine blade individually.
The S4 still has the twin-scroll turbo but the exhaust pulses probably mix together in one chamber (does the S4 manifold look like a log?).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IB Cristina
West RX-7 Forum
0
08-20-15 05:46 PM
succesfulljoe
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
08-20-15 08:59 AM



Quick Reply: Differences in TII models between the years



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.