2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

crankcase venting.. Need Help!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-12, 09:07 PM
  #26  
Dragons' Breath

 
gerald m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pump Handle, SK. Canada
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by texFCturboII
I see, thanks for the clarification. So you would then opt to have the fumes into the intake. If you simply vented to atmosphere though, you wouldn't be incurring a vacuum leak. You would be violating emissions laws in some states, however.
Yea you got it . as far as the catch can goes .. ( There not the classiest thing out there but out of sight out of mind ) they work fine .I can't say much about emissions or any rules or laws for that matter ,, If they ever caught my bike sticking it's nose out on the street they would chop off both my arms , stab my eyes out and fart in the holes . enough said have a good one everybody .
Old 11-13-12, 02:52 AM
  #27  
Burps and Braps

iTrader: (37)
 
LoLsmileyFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: GMR
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
the FC never had a true PCV valve though, it had a vacuum operated valve that dumped positive crankcase pressure into the intake piping before the throttle body(not pulled by vacuum like piston engines).

the FD has a true PCV system that is under vacuum and a separate one that dumps off into the intake like the FC system to operate when under boost.
i concur


dude just remove the charcoal can and plug all that stuff up. its so useless. this is what i did to one of my old t2's

simple oil filler neck to oil catch can then your done lol.

Old 11-13-12, 07:00 AM
  #28  
Junior Member

 
stephen16's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AusRotary.com • View topic - oil catch can problem

have a read, if its a turbo'd engine it HAS to have a vaccum feed
Old 11-13-12, 12:53 PM
  #29  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by stephen16
AusRotary.com • View topic - oil catch can problem

have a read, if its a turbo'd engine it HAS to have a vaccum feed
just because one person has a strict opinion on the subject does not make it true. i avoid plumbing it back into the engine to avoid pumping dirty oil back into the engine to be burned, lining the intake with sludgy dirty oil to be injected into the engine on a whim.

it is a bandaid for proper turbo oil pressure tuning or excessive blowby in your old tired worn out should be rebuilt engine.

and the intake piping he claims is a vacuum source is ambient air, it may pull a tiny bit of vacuum if it still has an AFM. a real vacuum source is beyond the throttle body.

crankcase oil vapors aren't nearly as harmful to the environment as unburnt raw fuel, so i don't see a huge problem with it. once you have a catch can installed you will see just what you are pushing into your engine..

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 11-13-12 at 12:57 PM.
Old 11-14-12, 02:47 AM
  #30  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
RX7-TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: MN
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MN so is this right?

i didnt really get a for sure answer haha. so is this right?
crankcase venting.. Need Help!!-untitled.png

or should there be vacuum? if it does need vacuum would someone be kind enough to draw a picture for me ha?
does it need a PCV and where in the pic should it be put?
Thanks for the help guys!
Old 11-14-12, 08:28 AM
  #31  
version 2.0

iTrader: (17)
 
texFCturboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,590
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Name:  catchcan.jpg
Views: 1154
Size:  27.2 KB

Or this, and be done with it. Or nothing at all, it doesn't really get messy in there.
Old 11-14-12, 08:52 AM
  #32  
Dragons' Breath

 
gerald m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pump Handle, SK. Canada
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7-TII
i didnt really get a for sure answer haha. so is this right?
Attachment 481544

or should there be vacuum? if it does need vacuum would someone be kind enough to draw a picture for me ha?
does it need a PCV and where in the pic should it be put?
Thanks for the help guys!
I don't want to get another long winded thing going here but if I was venting to a can I would run a hose from one of the fittings to the can end of story . If your engine is in fair shape there should be minimal vapor I don't see the reason for a filter keep it easy and simple . most guys don't even have a can they just vent with a hose to under the vehicle ( Not saying this is a good thing either but that is what most do weather they want to admit it or not ) . IMO the filter is a waste of time and money and will do nothing but plug with goo . .. Nothing as far as dust will find it's way up the hose it just doesn't happen . just don't have a loop in the hose that will trap anything .. of course for sure someone will have a different opinion .. Gerald m.
Old 11-14-12, 09:28 AM
  #33  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
The filter is a vent to atmosphere...without it, the can becomes pressurized and isn't doing it's job.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Trexthe3rd
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
06-05-05 12:50 AM
rustynogood
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
05-22-05 08:08 AM
Darth Linux
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
02-09-04 06:00 PM
J-Ville VR-4
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
17
05-20-03 11:17 PM
Maxthe7man
Single Turbo RX-7's
53
01-24-03 12:47 PM



Quick Reply: crankcase venting.. Need Help!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.