2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Check out this setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-03, 12:38 AM
  #1  
Microtech Tuning!

Thread Starter
 
Infini IV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 626 Socal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check out this setup

http://13b.power.ne.jp/main_contents...kojin/sfc3.jpg

Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?

Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
Old 01-06-03, 01:43 AM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (4)
 
mrb63083's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,748
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
with a fms you can ditch the afm, and not have to worry about it.
Old 01-06-03, 11:55 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
FastX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Check out this setup

Originally posted by Infini IV
http://13b.power.ne.jp/main_contents...kojin/sfc3.jpg

Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?

Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
It can blow a hose off anywhere before the AFM and still run for one...
I would think the ECU would have a better understanding of how much air the engine was injesting allowing it to be more accurate instead of measureing the intake air then references the boost sensor.
The boost sensor could also be rid of I would think as well. Since the AFM's measureing all the air, you wouldn't need it any more.
Old 01-06-03, 01:07 PM
  #4  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
Samps's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's absurd to run that kind of equipment off of the stock ECU.
Old 01-06-03, 01:09 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Jahoo88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you mount it close to the tb, after the BOV i think it would run much better then before the turbo. It would have better response and no hesitation whith an atmosphere vented BOV.

I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
Old 01-06-03, 01:19 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
FastX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Jahoo88
If you mount it close to the tb, after the BOV i think it would run much better then before the turbo. It would have better response and no hesitation whith an atmosphere vented BOV.

I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
I've ONLY seen that kind of set up on Japanese 7's. I'm curious as to how it works. All I can think of is that the boost sensor is useless because the AFM is seeing the EXACT amount of airflow. It would definitely take some experimenting.
Old 01-06-03, 01:25 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Jahoo88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well.... the boost sensor controls timing so it is still needed.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
Old 01-06-03, 01:28 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
FastX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Jahoo88
Well.... the boost sensor controls timing so it is still needed.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
Yea, I know the computer sees the amount... but with the AFM after the turbo, the actual AFM is seeing the amount of air. It's not being "interpreted" with the boost sensor.
Old 01-06-03, 02:06 PM
  #9  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: wow
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The primary reason for doing this was probably the bov. On the stock system if you used a atmosphere bov, the engine would go rich for a second when it would vent. If you put the afm after the turbo and the bov between the turbo and the afm there will be no change in A/F ratio at the time of vent. This is how it was done on my car.
Old 01-06-03, 02:09 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
FastX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by capsoval
The primary reason for doing this was probably the bov. On the stock system if you used a atmosphere bov, the engine would go rich for a second when it would vent. If you put the afm after the turbo and the bov between the turbo and the afm there will be no change in A/F ratio at the time of vent. This is how it was done on my car.
What'd you have to do to run that setup? Anything other than just moving the AFM?
Old 01-06-03, 02:57 PM
  #11  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: Re: Check out this setup

Originally posted by FastX7
I would think the ECU would have a better understanding of how much air the engine was injesting allowing it to be more accurate instead of measureing the intake air then references the boost sensor.
All the AFM measures is the velocity and the temperature of the air passing through it so the ECU can calculate mass airflow. This amount will be exactly the same no matter where you put the AFM. The boost sensor has nothing to do with this.
The boost sensor could also be rid of I would think as well. Since the AFM's measureing all the air, you wouldn't need it any more.
The boost sensor controls ignition timing and has nothing to do with measuring airflow.
Old 01-06-03, 03:00 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
FastX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, like I Said above... I was just speculating with all that. I in now way claimed to know what I was talking about :p
Old 01-06-03, 03:03 PM
  #13  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Jahoo88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capsoval: How did you extend the wiring to reach the new afm position?
Old 01-06-03, 03:32 PM
  #14  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Just remember that the AFM is not meant to be pressurized. Also, there is a temp sensor in the AFM, so the higher temps past the turbo will change the reading of that sensor.

I can't think of any advantage to putting the AFM in the intercooler piping, except perhaps if you have no other choice (lack of space for it before the turbo). The disadvantages, however, I mentioned in the first paragraph.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whinin
Introduce yourself
17
03-30-19 07:53 PM
whinin
New Member RX-7 Technical
10
09-05-15 11:52 PM
apooch
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
09-04-15 10:27 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-03-15 07:10 PM



Quick Reply: Check out this setup



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM.