Check out this setup
#1
Microtech Tuning!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 626 Socal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check out this setup
http://13b.power.ne.jp/main_contents...kojin/sfc3.jpg
Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?
Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?
Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Check out this setup
Originally posted by Infini IV
http://13b.power.ne.jp/main_contents...kojin/sfc3.jpg
Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?
Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
http://13b.power.ne.jp/main_contents...kojin/sfc3.jpg
Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?
Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
I would think the ECU would have a better understanding of how much air the engine was injesting allowing it to be more accurate instead of measureing the intake air then references the boost sensor.
The boost sensor could also be rid of I would think as well. Since the AFM's measureing all the air, you wouldn't need it any more.
#5
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you mount it close to the tb, after the BOV i think it would run much better then before the turbo. It would have better response and no hesitation whith an atmosphere vented BOV.
I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jahoo88
If you mount it close to the tb, after the BOV i think it would run much better then before the turbo. It would have better response and no hesitation whith an atmosphere vented BOV.
I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
If you mount it close to the tb, after the BOV i think it would run much better then before the turbo. It would have better response and no hesitation whith an atmosphere vented BOV.
I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
#7
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well.... the boost sensor controls timing so it is still needed.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jahoo88
Well.... the boost sensor controls timing so it is still needed.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
Well.... the boost sensor controls timing so it is still needed.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
#9
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: wow
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The primary reason for doing this was probably the bov. On the stock system if you used a atmosphere bov, the engine would go rich for a second when it would vent. If you put the afm after the turbo and the bov between the turbo and the afm there will be no change in A/F ratio at the time of vent. This is how it was done on my car.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by capsoval
The primary reason for doing this was probably the bov. On the stock system if you used a atmosphere bov, the engine would go rich for a second when it would vent. If you put the afm after the turbo and the bov between the turbo and the afm there will be no change in A/F ratio at the time of vent. This is how it was done on my car.
The primary reason for doing this was probably the bov. On the stock system if you used a atmosphere bov, the engine would go rich for a second when it would vent. If you put the afm after the turbo and the bov between the turbo and the afm there will be no change in A/F ratio at the time of vent. This is how it was done on my car.
#11
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Re: Re: Check out this setup
Originally posted by FastX7
I would think the ECU would have a better understanding of how much air the engine was injesting allowing it to be more accurate instead of measureing the intake air then references the boost sensor.
I would think the ECU would have a better understanding of how much air the engine was injesting allowing it to be more accurate instead of measureing the intake air then references the boost sensor.
The boost sensor could also be rid of I would think as well. Since the AFM's measureing all the air, you wouldn't need it any more.
#14
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Just remember that the AFM is not meant to be pressurized. Also, there is a temp sensor in the AFM, so the higher temps past the turbo will change the reading of that sensor.
I can't think of any advantage to putting the AFM in the intercooler piping, except perhaps if you have no other choice (lack of space for it before the turbo). The disadvantages, however, I mentioned in the first paragraph.
I can't think of any advantage to putting the AFM in the intercooler piping, except perhaps if you have no other choice (lack of space for it before the turbo). The disadvantages, however, I mentioned in the first paragraph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post