2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Check out this setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #1  
Infini IV's Avatar
Thread Starter
Microtech Tuning!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: 626 Socal
Check out this setup

http://13b.power.ne.jp/main_contents...kojin/sfc3.jpg

Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?

Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 01:43 AM
  #2  
mrb63083's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,748
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
with a fms you can ditch the afm, and not have to worry about it.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 11:55 AM
  #3  
FastX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Check out this setup

Originally posted by Infini IV
http://13b.power.ne.jp/main_contents...kojin/sfc3.jpg

Just want to know the downsides to having the AFM aft of the intercooler so that the air's blowing through it?

Are there any downsides? A friend told me you get better response among others I forgot.
It can blow a hose off anywhere before the AFM and still run for one...
I would think the ECU would have a better understanding of how much air the engine was injesting allowing it to be more accurate instead of measureing the intake air then references the boost sensor.
The boost sensor could also be rid of I would think as well. Since the AFM's measureing all the air, you wouldn't need it any more.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 01:07 PM
  #4  
Samps's Avatar
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
It's absurd to run that kind of equipment off of the stock ECU.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
Jahoo88's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
If you mount it close to the tb, after the BOV i think it would run much better then before the turbo. It would have better response and no hesitation whith an atmosphere vented BOV.

I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 01:19 PM
  #6  
FastX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally posted by Jahoo88
If you mount it close to the tb, after the BOV i think it would run much better then before the turbo. It would have better response and no hesitation whith an atmosphere vented BOV.

I was gonna do this and i think i still may give it a try, only downside i can think of is you have to extend the wiring to the other side of the engine bay.
I've ONLY seen that kind of set up on Japanese 7's. I'm curious as to how it works. All I can think of is that the boost sensor is useless because the AFM is seeing the EXACT amount of airflow. It would definitely take some experimenting.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 01:25 PM
  #7  
Jahoo88's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
Well.... the boost sensor controls timing so it is still needed.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 01:28 PM
  #8  
FastX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally posted by Jahoo88
Well.... the boost sensor controls timing so it is still needed.
The computer knows the exact amount of air in a stock setup also other then when an atmo BOV blows air off.
Yea, I know the computer sees the amount... but with the AFM after the turbo, the actual AFM is seeing the amount of air. It's not being "interpreted" with the boost sensor.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 02:06 PM
  #9  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: wow
The primary reason for doing this was probably the bov. On the stock system if you used a atmosphere bov, the engine would go rich for a second when it would vent. If you put the afm after the turbo and the bov between the turbo and the afm there will be no change in A/F ratio at the time of vent. This is how it was done on my car.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #10  
FastX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally posted by capsoval
The primary reason for doing this was probably the bov. On the stock system if you used a atmosphere bov, the engine would go rich for a second when it would vent. If you put the afm after the turbo and the bov between the turbo and the afm there will be no change in A/F ratio at the time of vent. This is how it was done on my car.
What'd you have to do to run that setup? Anything other than just moving the AFM?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #11  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: Re: Check out this setup

Originally posted by FastX7
I would think the ECU would have a better understanding of how much air the engine was injesting allowing it to be more accurate instead of measureing the intake air then references the boost sensor.
All the AFM measures is the velocity and the temperature of the air passing through it so the ECU can calculate mass airflow. This amount will be exactly the same no matter where you put the AFM. The boost sensor has nothing to do with this.
The boost sensor could also be rid of I would think as well. Since the AFM's measureing all the air, you wouldn't need it any more.
The boost sensor controls ignition timing and has nothing to do with measuring airflow.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 03:00 PM
  #12  
FastX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Well, like I Said above... I was just speculating with all that. I in now way claimed to know what I was talking about :p
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 03:03 PM
  #13  
Jahoo88's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
Capsoval: How did you extend the wiring to reach the new afm position?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 03:32 PM
  #14  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Just remember that the AFM is not meant to be pressurized. Also, there is a temp sensor in the AFM, so the higher temps past the turbo will change the reading of that sensor.

I can't think of any advantage to putting the AFM in the intercooler piping, except perhaps if you have no other choice (lack of space for it before the turbo). The disadvantages, however, I mentioned in the first paragraph.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whinin
Introduce yourself
17
Mar 30, 2019 07:53 PM
whinin
New Member RX-7 Technical
10
Sep 5, 2015 11:52 PM
apooch
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
Sep 4, 2015 10:27 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Sep 3, 2015 07:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.