CFM chart for 13b n/a
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CFM chart for 13b n/a
Ok guys, I know people have talked about cfm a lot in the past but I need something more.
Does anyone know where I can find a chart for cfm across the rev range of a s4 N/A13b??
I've searched already and all I can find are people saying oh it flows 350 cfm or something at WOT. But I'm wondering if anyone has numbers for across the range.
Thanks.
Does anyone know where I can find a chart for cfm across the rev range of a s4 N/A13b??
I've searched already and all I can find are people saying oh it flows 350 cfm or something at WOT. But I'm wondering if anyone has numbers for across the range.
Thanks.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try these numbers. The calcs are based on the rotors turning one complete rev for every two turns of the e-shaft.
Rob
1000 22.95 cfm
2000 45.91
3000 68.86
4000 91.82
5000 114.77
6000 137.73
7000 160.68
Rob
1000 22.95 cfm
2000 45.91
3000 68.86
4000 91.82
5000 114.77
6000 137.73
7000 160.68
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so is that one rotor and full rotor rotation, 1 chamber and full rotor rotation, 1 chamber and 1 e-shaft rotation, or 1 rotor and 1 e-shaft rotation??
Not trying to be mean, just a little vauge on your description of the numbers.
The reason I'd like to know the cfm through the range is for matching cfm for a supercharger of sorts. I'd like to be able to see the flow through the range of both.
Not trying to be mean, just a little vauge on your description of the numbers.
The reason I'd like to know the cfm through the range is for matching cfm for a supercharger of sorts. I'd like to be able to see the flow through the range of both.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, 3 e-shaft turns for 1 rotor turn, but I seem to recall somewhere reading that max flow from a 13b at 8000 is 35X cfm or something so maybe that's 1 rotor full rotation.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what I mean is maybe he calculated it for one rotor and for the engine it's twice what he said in that list.
Hopefully while I study for my final tomorrow morning someone will help us out
Hopefully while I study for my final tomorrow morning someone will help us out
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Each rotation of the rotors (1300cc) equals .04591 ft^3. So if the rotors were turning at 1000 rpm, the rotors would be displacing 45.91 cfm. And if the rotors were turning at 7000 rpm you would have 321 cfm. The key word here is Rotors. So the question is - how fast are the rotors turning in relation to the e-shaft? If rpms are measured by e-shaft rotation and the ratio is 3:1 then you can take my numbers in the table above, multiply by 2 and divide by 3 to get the proper answers. or 107 cfm @7000 rpm.
Rob
Rob
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are you telling me the 13b flows 45 cfm @ 3k showing on the tack, and 107 at 7k? That just sounds a lot lower than what I've heard.
Last edited by Chimeron; 12-03-04 at 04:46 PM.
#14
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
You guys are really going to confuse yourselves if you harp on the eccentric shaft and rotor configuration.
It's actually very easy... The 13B engine displaces 1.308 L per revolution of the flywheel. In other words, at 1 rpm (tachometer reading) it displaces 1.308 L per minute. Now, this is assuming 100% volumetric efficiency, but the base equation is very simple.
Therefore, your theoretical flow rate (assuming 100% volumetric efficiency) is:
rpm /cfm/ lbs per min @ ISA conditions
1000 /46/ 4
2000 /93/ 7
3000 /139/ 11
4000 /185/ 14
5000 /231/ 18
6000 /278/ 21
7000 /324/ 25
8000 /370/ 28
Notes:
1) Non-ported engines will consume less cfm because their volumetric efficiency will be less than the optimal 100% used in these calculations.
2) Volumetric efficiency is not a constant, and varies with rpm and other factors, depending on the configuration of the engine system. It is only used as a constant here to simplify things.
3) These cfm numbers are NOT compatible with carb cfm ratings which are based on the vacuum signal of a piston engine rather than the calculated flow rate of the engine.
It's actually very easy... The 13B engine displaces 1.308 L per revolution of the flywheel. In other words, at 1 rpm (tachometer reading) it displaces 1.308 L per minute. Now, this is assuming 100% volumetric efficiency, but the base equation is very simple.
Therefore, your theoretical flow rate (assuming 100% volumetric efficiency) is:
rpm /cfm/ lbs per min @ ISA conditions
1000 /46/ 4
2000 /93/ 7
3000 /139/ 11
4000 /185/ 14
5000 /231/ 18
6000 /278/ 21
7000 /324/ 25
8000 /370/ 28
Notes:
1) Non-ported engines will consume less cfm because their volumetric efficiency will be less than the optimal 100% used in these calculations.
2) Volumetric efficiency is not a constant, and varies with rpm and other factors, depending on the configuration of the engine system. It is only used as a constant here to simplify things.
3) These cfm numbers are NOT compatible with carb cfm ratings which are based on the vacuum signal of a piston engine rather than the calculated flow rate of the engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM