2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Can I meet 350 hp goal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-23, 10:35 AM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Rockledge, florida
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Can I meet 350 hp goal

I have a 1990 6-port Rx-7. I havent finished the project yet but my goal is 350 hp and I'm curious if this set up makes it possible:
Port matched TII intake manifolds
Borg warner S362 turbo
Turbosource exhaust manifold
Single exit exhaust(fab)
Link monsoon with custom wire harness
AEM water meth injection
Bridgeport (not super intense, but idk if it's considered a half bridge)
CX racing intercooler
Turbosource Studs
koyo rad radiator
just looking for 350 rn. I'm 17 and all this has been budget over a year, and I think 350 is good for me for now
Old 03-29-23, 12:35 PM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,844
Received 2,606 Likes on 1,849 Posts
i would say that the hardware should do 350hp pretty easily. with a bridge you want to keep the pre turbo pressure close to intake pressure.
it might depend on the turbine housing you picked. if it was mine i would start at the lowest boost and maybe keep rpm reasonable (6500?), and just start tuning.

compressor is good for around 500hp, so you have plenty of capability there
Old 03-29-23, 02:22 PM
  #3  
Dak
Information Regurgitator

 
Dak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sparta TN. United States
Posts: 1,896
Received 172 Likes on 129 Posts
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i would say that the hardware should do 350hp pretty easily. with a bridge you want to keep the pre turbo pressure close to intake pressure.
it might depend on the turbine housing you picked. if it was mine i would start at the lowest boost and maybe keep rpm reasonable (6500?), and just start tuning.

compressor is good for around 500hp, so you have plenty of capability there
A couple of questions:
1. I was thinking a bridge wasn't needed to make 350whp with a turbo.
2. I also thought water/ meth injection wasn't needed if you didn't use the top mount and went to a front mount intercooler. Though he didn't mention what his plan was for an intercooler so the water/ meth may be to keep the stock top mount location.
Am I completely mistaken? My eventual power goal is also 350whp and I have no plans to do either. I won't be using the top mount as I don't have a TII hood nor will I be using the TII UIM (FD upper). Will initially be front mount.
Old 03-29-23, 02:25 PM
  #4  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Rockledge, florida
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Dak
A couple of questions:
1. I was thinking a bridge wasn't needed to make 350whp with a turbo.
2. I also thought water/ meth injection wasn't needed if you didn't use the top mount and went to a front mount intercooler. Though he didn't mention what his plan was for an intercooler so the water/ meth may be to keep the stock top mount location.
Am I completely mistaken? My eventual power goal is also 350whp and I have no plans to do either. I won't be using the top mount as I don't have a TII hood nor will I be using the TII UIM (FD upper). Will initially be front mount.
for me the bridge is for the braps. Nothing more. And the water meth is because my tuner has done a few 6-port turbo builds and says it's essential if I want the motor to be reliable. The water meth is there for reliability. Both arent for performance, just for quality of life. I'm okay with more than 350, but that's what I'd be okay with.
Old 03-29-23, 02:31 PM
  #5  
Dak
Information Regurgitator

 
Dak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sparta TN. United States
Posts: 1,896
Received 172 Likes on 129 Posts
Originally Posted by Loose-Goose1255
for me the bridge is for the braps. Nothing more. And the water meth is because my tuner has done a few 6-port turbo builds and says it's essential if I want the motor to be reliable. The water meth is there for reliability. Both arent for performance, just for quality of life. I'm okay with more than 350, but that's what I'd be okay with.
I thought it might be due to the higher compression n/a rotors.
Old 03-29-23, 02:49 PM
  #6  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Rockledge, florida
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Dak
I thought it might be due to the higher compression n/a rotors.
which one? Bridge or water meth? Cuz I think the water meth is for that but idk abt the bridgeport. I just want braps lol
Old 03-29-23, 05:00 PM
  #7  
Dak
Information Regurgitator

 
Dak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sparta TN. United States
Posts: 1,896
Received 172 Likes on 129 Posts
Originally Posted by Loose-Goose1255
which one? Bridge or water meth? Cuz I think the water meth is for that but idk abt the bridgeport. I just want braps lol
The water/ meth injection.
Old 03-29-23, 08:12 PM
  #8  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Rockledge, florida
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Dak
The water/ meth injection.
its a reliability thing my tuner suggested. That's why I'm installing it
Old 03-30-23, 08:56 AM
  #9  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,844
Received 2,606 Likes on 1,849 Posts
Originally Posted by Dak
A couple of questions:
1. I was thinking a bridge wasn't needed to make 350whp with a turbo.
its not, the old HKS catalog has you at ~350hp (not sure if its at the engine or flywheel) with a stock engine, sport turbo, front mount, intake exhaust, and ecu

2. I also thought water/ meth injection wasn't needed if you didn't use the top mount and went to a front mount intercooler..
IMO i don't think you need it for 350hp, especially if your other temps are good.
Old 03-30-23, 09:39 AM
  #10  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Rockledge, florida
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
its not, the old HKS catalog has you at ~350hp (not sure if its at the engine or flywheel) with a stock engine, sport turbo, front mount, intake exhaust, and ecu



IMO i don't think you need it for 350hp, especially if your other temps are good.
I think the biggest reason for the water meth is because my motor isnt a 4-port. It's an N/A converted to turbo, so it has higher compression and isnt as strong as the actual turbo motor. The bridgeport I purely want for the braps tbh lol
The following users liked this post:
j9fd3s (03-30-23)
Old 03-30-23, 11:06 AM
  #11  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
The bridgeport adds braps but makes driveability tuning a lot harder.
Old 04-02-23, 08:27 PM
  #12  
REINCARNATED

iTrader: (4)
 
Relisys190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Eastern USA
Posts: 1,642
Received 140 Likes on 98 Posts
350 wheel or???

I just ran my S5 6 port for the first time. running 12psi on a BNR Stage 3 turbo on a stock port 80,000 mile engine, Haltech 1500, I managed 283 to the wheel at 7200 rpms on E85. This was a chassis dyno bolted to my hubs. I told them to increase the cutoff to 8000 but the safety kept engaging I believe.
The following users liked this post:
j9fd3s (04-03-23)
Old 04-10-23, 03:04 PM
  #13  
Full Member
 
Michael Mansour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 245
Received 95 Likes on 50 Posts
I legitimately was you 5-6 years ago. Prepare for many thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours in the garage. You will be very satisfied once you make it to your goal.... I would recommend a 4 port motor and a haltech
The following 2 users liked this post by Michael Mansour:
DR_Knight (04-16-23), mr_vaughn (04-19-23)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Howard Coleman
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
22
03-01-17 10:29 PM
MOBEONER
NE RX-7 Forum
211
05-24-12 06:13 PM
rwdburnout
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
09-06-06 03:53 AM
2slow4stock
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
30
02-07-05 12:23 PM
DC350
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
01-28-02 09:04 PM



Quick Reply: Can I meet 350 hp goal



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.