2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Can I meet 350 hp goal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 10:35 AM
  #1  
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 74
Likes: 10
From: Rockledge, florida
Can I meet 350 hp goal

I have a 1990 6-port Rx-7. I havent finished the project yet but my goal is 350 hp and I'm curious if this set up makes it possible:
Port matched TII intake manifolds
Borg warner S362 turbo
Turbosource exhaust manifold
Single exit exhaust(fab)
Link monsoon with custom wire harness
AEM water meth injection
Bridgeport (not super intense, but idk if it's considered a half bridge)
CX racing intercooler
Turbosource Studs
koyo rad radiator
just looking for 350 rn. I'm 17 and all this has been budget over a year, and I think 350 is good for me for now
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 12:35 PM
  #2  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
i would say that the hardware should do 350hp pretty easily. with a bridge you want to keep the pre turbo pressure close to intake pressure.
it might depend on the turbine housing you picked. if it was mine i would start at the lowest boost and maybe keep rpm reasonable (6500?), and just start tuning.

compressor is good for around 500hp, so you have plenty of capability there
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 02:22 PM
  #3  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i would say that the hardware should do 350hp pretty easily. with a bridge you want to keep the pre turbo pressure close to intake pressure.
it might depend on the turbine housing you picked. if it was mine i would start at the lowest boost and maybe keep rpm reasonable (6500?), and just start tuning.

compressor is good for around 500hp, so you have plenty of capability there
A couple of questions:
1. I was thinking a bridge wasn't needed to make 350whp with a turbo.
2. I also thought water/ meth injection wasn't needed if you didn't use the top mount and went to a front mount intercooler. Though he didn't mention what his plan was for an intercooler so the water/ meth may be to keep the stock top mount location.
Am I completely mistaken? My eventual power goal is also 350whp and I have no plans to do either. I won't be using the top mount as I don't have a TII hood nor will I be using the TII UIM (FD upper). Will initially be front mount.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 02:25 PM
  #4  
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 74
Likes: 10
From: Rockledge, florida
Originally Posted by Dak
A couple of questions:
1. I was thinking a bridge wasn't needed to make 350whp with a turbo.
2. I also thought water/ meth injection wasn't needed if you didn't use the top mount and went to a front mount intercooler. Though he didn't mention what his plan was for an intercooler so the water/ meth may be to keep the stock top mount location.
Am I completely mistaken? My eventual power goal is also 350whp and I have no plans to do either. I won't be using the top mount as I don't have a TII hood nor will I be using the TII UIM (FD upper). Will initially be front mount.
for me the bridge is for the braps. Nothing more. And the water meth is because my tuner has done a few 6-port turbo builds and says it's essential if I want the motor to be reliable. The water meth is there for reliability. Both arent for performance, just for quality of life. I'm okay with more than 350, but that's what I'd be okay with.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 02:31 PM
  #5  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
Originally Posted by Loose-Goose1255
for me the bridge is for the braps. Nothing more. And the water meth is because my tuner has done a few 6-port turbo builds and says it's essential if I want the motor to be reliable. The water meth is there for reliability. Both arent for performance, just for quality of life. I'm okay with more than 350, but that's what I'd be okay with.
I thought it might be due to the higher compression n/a rotors.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 02:49 PM
  #6  
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 74
Likes: 10
From: Rockledge, florida
Originally Posted by Dak
I thought it might be due to the higher compression n/a rotors.
which one? Bridge or water meth? Cuz I think the water meth is for that but idk abt the bridgeport. I just want braps lol
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 05:00 PM
  #7  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
Originally Posted by Loose-Goose1255
which one? Bridge or water meth? Cuz I think the water meth is for that but idk abt the bridgeport. I just want braps lol
The water/ meth injection.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 08:12 PM
  #8  
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 74
Likes: 10
From: Rockledge, florida
Originally Posted by Dak
The water/ meth injection.
its a reliability thing my tuner suggested. That's why I'm installing it
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2023 | 08:56 AM
  #9  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Dak
A couple of questions:
1. I was thinking a bridge wasn't needed to make 350whp with a turbo.
its not, the old HKS catalog has you at ~350hp (not sure if its at the engine or flywheel) with a stock engine, sport turbo, front mount, intake exhaust, and ecu

2. I also thought water/ meth injection wasn't needed if you didn't use the top mount and went to a front mount intercooler..
IMO i don't think you need it for 350hp, especially if your other temps are good.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2023 | 09:39 AM
  #10  
Loose-Goose1255's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 74
Likes: 10
From: Rockledge, florida
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
its not, the old HKS catalog has you at ~350hp (not sure if its at the engine or flywheel) with a stock engine, sport turbo, front mount, intake exhaust, and ecu



IMO i don't think you need it for 350hp, especially if your other temps are good.
I think the biggest reason for the water meth is because my motor isnt a 4-port. It's an N/A converted to turbo, so it has higher compression and isnt as strong as the actual turbo motor. The bridgeport I purely want for the braps tbh lol
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2023 | 11:06 AM
  #11  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
The bridgeport adds braps but makes driveability tuning a lot harder.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2023 | 08:27 PM
  #12  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
350 wheel or???

I just ran my S5 6 port for the first time. running 12psi on a BNR Stage 3 turbo on a stock port 80,000 mile engine, Haltech 1500, I managed 283 to the wheel at 7200 rpms on E85. This was a chassis dyno bolted to my hubs. I told them to increase the cutoff to 8000 but the safety kept engaging I believe.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 03:04 PM
  #13  
Michael Mansour's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 287
Likes: 122
From: Virginia
I legitimately was you 5-6 years ago. Prepare for many thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours in the garage. You will be very satisfied once you make it to your goal.... I would recommend a 4 port motor and a haltech
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Howard Coleman
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
22
Mar 1, 2017 10:29 PM
MOBEONER
NE RX-7 Forum
211
May 24, 2012 06:13 PM
rwdburnout
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
Sep 6, 2006 03:53 AM
2slow4stock
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
30
Feb 7, 2005 12:23 PM
DC350
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Jan 28, 2002 09:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.