Bridgeport opinions
#1
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bridgeport opinions
I was looking for opinions from any Bridgeport owners about the street manners of their cars.
Specifically, I was wondering how civilized (or lack of) the car was around town.
I realize that the idle would have to be set up high, and would be lumpy. But, what are the drawbacks to the engine? I also have a friend that drives a BP first gen, and he had problems getting an exhaust to work that wouldn't choke the engine, and wouldn't get him tickets for noise.
I am considering a purchasing a large BP turbo engine, and trying to decide if I can put up with the quirks of a BP on the street.
This would be more a weekend type car than a DD.
Specifically, I was wondering how civilized (or lack of) the car was around town.
I realize that the idle would have to be set up high, and would be lumpy. But, what are the drawbacks to the engine? I also have a friend that drives a BP first gen, and he had problems getting an exhaust to work that wouldn't choke the engine, and wouldn't get him tickets for noise.
I am considering a purchasing a large BP turbo engine, and trying to decide if I can put up with the quirks of a BP on the street.
This would be more a weekend type car than a DD.
#2
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (5)
Depends on what you consider streetable. A quiet exhaust will eliminate all the topend potential of the brdigeport. I run full 2 1/2" exhaust with 2 presilencers and a full size aero muffler (previously a magnaflow, basically the same thing), but I also have an alectric cutout for full power potential so I get the best of both worlds. Since I run the camden, mine is very very civilized, but with a turbo it's a different story. Idle is different between the two, the camden tames the bridgeport quite a bit. Here are links to videos, both have the exact same 1/2 bridge engine (mine came from the black car). The first gen has the camden while the second gen has a big turbo. (ooooh, and before someone says it, the turbo was faster!) http://s222.photobucket.com/albums/d...hortbridge.flv
http://s222.photobucket.com/albums/d...nt=exhaust.flv
http://s222.photobucket.com/albums/d...nt=exhaust.flv
#3
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
I have a smallish bridge on my car...
It's perfectly streetable from idle to wherever. But keep in mind that the idle is about 1300-1400 RPM. Consider anything below that on the tach to be unusable at low loads.
Turbo bridgeports are a totally different beast then NA bridgeports. The turbo quites the exhaust down a lot, and the bridgeport spools the turbo easily. That alone makes the car infinitely more drivable at medium throttle.
You'll obviously need a standalone EMS to run the thing, and tuning a low vacuum engine with an unsteady MAP signal is much harder then stock/street ports.
It's also hard to get decent mileage out of a bridgeport due to overlap. On the highway it's fine, but figure 8-10 MPG in the city. I've had well-known bridgeport people tell me that they are able to tune the car and get 15-18 MPG in the city out of their cars, but none of them have ever answered my question of "How?" and since I've been experimenting with mine for 3 years and can't seem to get above 10 MPG, I don't believe them.
It's perfectly streetable from idle to wherever. But keep in mind that the idle is about 1300-1400 RPM. Consider anything below that on the tach to be unusable at low loads.
Turbo bridgeports are a totally different beast then NA bridgeports. The turbo quites the exhaust down a lot, and the bridgeport spools the turbo easily. That alone makes the car infinitely more drivable at medium throttle.
You'll obviously need a standalone EMS to run the thing, and tuning a low vacuum engine with an unsteady MAP signal is much harder then stock/street ports.
It's also hard to get decent mileage out of a bridgeport due to overlap. On the highway it's fine, but figure 8-10 MPG in the city. I've had well-known bridgeport people tell me that they are able to tune the car and get 15-18 MPG in the city out of their cars, but none of them have ever answered my question of "How?" and since I've been experimenting with mine for 3 years and can't seem to get above 10 MPG, I don't believe them.
#4
Rotary Retarded...
iTrader: (2)
Well from what I understand (and keep in mind that I am no rotary expert) I have heard that the bridgeported engines tend not to last very long. If you considering streetability then perhaps longevity is in your thoughts as well. I had a friend of mine who had a full bridgeport with a T-88 turbo...and it did make 588whp...but the engine only lasted a few months before it suffered catostrophic failure. Any engine that is as violent and fast reving as a bridgeported rotary is will be prone to failure, even if you take care of it. EVERYTHING has to be spot on and damn near perfect for the close to 10,000 RPM's these engines achieve. And a small accident on your part could mean a major breakdown.
Just my .02 to consider before spending major bucks on one of these.
-Vincent
Just my .02 to consider before spending major bucks on one of these.
-Vincent
#5
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
iTrader: (3)
Well from what I understand (and keep in mind that I am no rotary expert) I have heard that the bridgeported engines tend not to last very long. If you considering streetability then perhaps longevity is in your thoughts as well. I had a friend of mine who had a full bridgeport with a T-88 turbo...and it did make 588whp...but the engine only lasted a few months before it suffered catostrophic failure. Any engine that is as violent and fast reving as a bridgeported rotary is will be prone to failure, even if you take care of it. EVERYTHING has to be spot on and damn near perfect for the close to 10,000 RPM's these engines achieve. And a small accident on your part could mean a major breakdown.
Just my .02 to consider before spending major bucks on one of these.
-Vincent
Just my .02 to consider before spending major bucks on one of these.
-Vincent
You could make 588whp on a streetport, but the engine wouldn't last long - eyebrows or not. Any time you push close to 5 times the output an engine was designed for, you can safely say you'll reduce its useable lifespan by 5 times also.
The longevity claim is mostly in regards to large bridges (or people who've had crap BP's done...) where you're going all out. You can cut a "reliable" BP and still get good flow and power from it.
#7
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I keep coming back to the same thought: Buy a fresh rebuilt streetport T2 engine.
I can still do it cheap enough with a lot less hassles.
Thanks for all the input, I appreciate it.
I can still do it cheap enough with a lot less hassles.
Thanks for all the input, I appreciate it.
Trending Topics
#8
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (5)
Unless you really wanted the aggressiveness (sound etc) of the bridgeport (which I did!). AAaaaand, it's not your daily driver (mine is a toy) aaaaand fuel economy is not an issue since it's an occasional driver (my 24 year old GSLSE only has 160,000 km on it) than i would definitely suggest a streetport and invest in a quality ball bearing turbo and you'll be very pleased!
#9
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (5)
Well from what I understand (and keep in mind that I am no rotary expert) I have heard that the bridgeported engines tend not to last very long. If you considering streetability then perhaps longevity is in your thoughts as well. I had a friend of mine who had a full bridgeport with a T-88 turbo...and it did make 588whp...but the engine only lasted a few months before it suffered catostrophic failure. Any engine that is as violent and fast reving as a bridgeported rotary is will be prone to failure, even if you take care of it. EVERYTHING has to be spot on and damn near perfect for the close to 10,000 RPM's these engines achieve. And a small accident on your part could mean a major breakdown.
Just my .02 to consider before spending major bucks on one of these.
-Vincent
Just my .02 to consider before spending major bucks on one of these.
-Vincent
#10
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Yep, what he said. With a thick bridge and one that doesn't intrude on seal paths, you'll be just as reliable as a street or stock port. I'm convinced that the bad press about bridgeport reliability was actually created by the J port.
But remember, if you go bridgeport it means going to a large turbo which necessitates all the upgrades that go along with it.
But remember, if you go bridgeport it means going to a large turbo which necessitates all the upgrades that go along with it.
#11
Wanker Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you can handle the expense & hassle, the bridge is great. if it sounds like a bit much, stick with street.
If you do bridge, hit up BDC...
#12
so you got pistons oh wow
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read something on another thread that sounded real smart. Its not about how streetable it is if not how much are you willing to tollerate!!!! I was in the same boat when I started building my car. I ended up with a large street port by the way!!!
#13
BDC Motorsports
Yep, what he said. With a thick bridge and one that doesn't intrude on seal paths, you'll be just as reliable as a street or stock port. I'm convinced that the bad press about bridgeport reliability was actually created by the J port.
But remember, if you go bridgeport it means going to a large turbo which necessitates all the upgrades that go along with it.
But remember, if you go bridgeport it means going to a large turbo which necessitates all the upgrades that go along with it.
Partial bridgeport turbos work real well. I'm still driving mine (well, although it's parked because of something goofed w/ the driveline) and it drives quite well. Keep a stock flywheel on it. They sound great and drive quite well provided the bridgeport cuts aren't the size of watermelons.
B
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 08:12 PM