2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

better UIM for 6port turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2005 | 07:59 AM
  #1  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow better UIM for 6port turbo

Hey, I am beginning to plan and compile parts for my attempt at a 6 port turbo setup and was wondering if anyone knew if the s4 mani or the vdi mani would suite this application better better. Would the vdi have the same benefits as it does in a N/A motor?
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 09:47 AM
  #2  
ultradef's Avatar
Ready to Rock
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
www.1300cc.com sells (or will be soon) a 6 port turbo kit that includes a new UIM and LIM that allows enough clearance for the turbo.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #3  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by ultradef
www.1300cc.com sells (or will be soon) a 6 port turbo kit that includes a new UIM and LIM that allows enough clearance for the turbo.
Ive chatted with sonikrat(the owner/manufacturer) quite a bit about this and fully intend on buying his kit before the end of the year. However the kit runs about 4x as much as im spending on this and I would like to have something (though less efficient and powerful) to play around with for the time being.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #4  
Autocrosser7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
What are the advantages to turboing an N/A as opposed to just buying a turbo motor?
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:02 PM
  #5  
Houstonderk's Avatar
My girl
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 3
From: Andrews AFB, MD
higher compression rotors. couple of other things. I am doing this right now with an n/a motor with Tii manifolds and injectors and an FD fuel pump. Of cours the whole Tii drivetrain as well. just waiting for my other parts.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #6  
Autocrosser7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Of course, with the higher compression, 91 octane becomes necessary, right?
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #7  
Houstonderk's Avatar
My girl
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 3
From: Andrews AFB, MD
don't think so with the extra fuel.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:23 PM
  #8  
Autocrosser7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
So the extra fuel won't pre-ignite even if it's 87 octane. Sorry for all the questions. I'm new to rotaries. I'd prefer to ask a ton of questions now and not blow anything later.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #9  
BlaCkPlaGUE's Avatar
I live in an igloo
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: calgary alberta
rotaries or piston, don't matter, if you throw more fuel at any engine thats force inducted then you lower the chance of detonation.
Its the worst way to do it though, proper way is to get a higher octane and better intercooling, but when you throw more fuel at those kinds of engines your gonna waste more gas and have a very poorly tuned engine.

Why don't they have any pictures of the intake mani's? If someone is gonna put down 1300$ for that they should at least see some pictures.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #10  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by BlaCkPlaGUE
rotaries or piston, don't matter, if you throw more fuel at any engine thats force inducted then you lower the chance of detonation.
Its the worst way to do it though, proper way is to get a higher octane and better intercooling, but when you throw more fuel at those kinds of engines your gonna waste more gas and have a very poorly tuned engine.

Why don't they have any pictures of the intake mani's? If someone is gonna put down 1300$ for that they should at least see some pictures.
If you'r referring to me, it's because the two kits I had bought simply for that purpose (pictures, documenting install, etc) have basically been stolen from me and I've had little to no time to replace what I've lost, thus my delays.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #11  
Houstonderk's Avatar
My girl
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 3
From: Andrews AFB, MD
man that sucks. I was wanting to see those too.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #12  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Vaiable length intake manifolds (like the VDI) do work with turbos, but the gains relative to the effect of the turbo are quite minor. This is why manufacturers don't usually spend developement time and money to develop these systems for their turbo engines, but go to great lengths for theit NA ones. Using the same line of thinking, if you don't have a VDI manifold, it's not worth going to all the trouble of adding one to an engine you plan to turbo. But if you have it, there's no reason to disable it.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #13  
Houstonderk's Avatar
My girl
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 3
From: Andrews AFB, MD
VDI are those on the Tii model?
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #14  
Tessai's Avatar
What will I drive next?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
VDI are on the N/A manifolds.

Another UIM you can use, with a little porting work, is an FD UIM/Throttle body. The FD uses a different style of TPS, though. I'm not going to argue over which manifold would be best to use, because I don't have any first hand information. Just tossing in another possibility.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #15  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Tessai
The FD uses a different style of TPS, though.
It looks different, but works exactly the same and requires nothing more than simple wire-matching.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #16  
Tessai's Avatar
What will I drive next?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
It looks different, but works exactly the same and requires nothing more than simple wire-matching.
I was just trying to emphasize the fact that it isn't going to be a direct plug-and-play. The connector on the FC wiring harness won't work on an FD TPS. What I plan on doing is to find someone parting out their FD and get the TPS plug and some of the wiring, and run it to an SAFC or other piggyback, as when going turbo you need something to control the fuel anyway.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #17  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
True, not plug and play, but for the FD UIM swap, the TPS is the least of the challenges before you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Aug 21, 2015 01:56 PM
Thomas618
General Rotary Tech Support
2
Aug 21, 2015 09:21 AM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Aug 19, 2015 09:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.