better UIM for 6port turbo
Hey, I am beginning to plan and compile parts for my attempt at a 6 port turbo setup and was wondering if anyone knew if the s4 mani or the vdi mani would suite this application better better. Would the vdi have the same benefits as it does in a N/A motor?
www.1300cc.com sells (or will be soon) a 6 port turbo kit that includes a new UIM and LIM that allows enough clearance for the turbo.
Originally Posted by ultradef
www.1300cc.com sells (or will be soon) a 6 port turbo kit that includes a new UIM and LIM that allows enough clearance for the turbo.
higher compression rotors. couple of other things. I am doing this right now with an n/a motor with Tii manifolds and injectors and an FD fuel pump. Of cours the whole Tii drivetrain as well. just waiting for my other parts.
Trending Topics
rotaries or piston, don't matter, if you throw more fuel at any engine thats force inducted then you lower the chance of detonation.
Its the worst way to do it though, proper way is to get a higher octane and better intercooling, but when you throw more fuel at those kinds of engines your gonna waste more gas and have a very poorly tuned engine.
Why don't they have any pictures of the intake mani's? If someone is gonna put down 1300$ for that they should at least see some pictures.
Its the worst way to do it though, proper way is to get a higher octane and better intercooling, but when you throw more fuel at those kinds of engines your gonna waste more gas and have a very poorly tuned engine.
Why don't they have any pictures of the intake mani's? If someone is gonna put down 1300$ for that they should at least see some pictures.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by BlaCkPlaGUE
rotaries or piston, don't matter, if you throw more fuel at any engine thats force inducted then you lower the chance of detonation.
Its the worst way to do it though, proper way is to get a higher octane and better intercooling, but when you throw more fuel at those kinds of engines your gonna waste more gas and have a very poorly tuned engine.
Why don't they have any pictures of the intake mani's? If someone is gonna put down 1300$ for that they should at least see some pictures.
Its the worst way to do it though, proper way is to get a higher octane and better intercooling, but when you throw more fuel at those kinds of engines your gonna waste more gas and have a very poorly tuned engine.
Why don't they have any pictures of the intake mani's? If someone is gonna put down 1300$ for that they should at least see some pictures.
Vaiable length intake manifolds (like the VDI) do work with turbos, but the gains relative to the effect of the turbo are quite minor. This is why manufacturers don't usually spend developement time and money to develop these systems for their turbo engines, but go to great lengths for theit NA ones. Using the same line of thinking, if you don't have a VDI manifold, it's not worth going to all the trouble of adding one to an engine you plan to turbo. But if you have it, there's no reason to disable it.
VDI are on the N/A manifolds.
Another UIM you can use, with a little porting work, is an FD UIM/Throttle body. The FD uses a different style of TPS, though. I'm not going to argue over which manifold would be best to use, because I don't have any first hand information. Just tossing in another possibility.
Another UIM you can use, with a little porting work, is an FD UIM/Throttle body. The FD uses a different style of TPS, though. I'm not going to argue over which manifold would be best to use, because I don't have any first hand information. Just tossing in another possibility.
Originally Posted by Tessai
The FD uses a different style of TPS, though.
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
It looks different, but works exactly the same and requires nothing more than simple wire-matching.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



