Best way to control secondaries
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: dallas,texas
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best way to control secondaries
Ok guys,
For my upgrades I am told that I will need secondary injectors. So my question to everyone is this. What is the best way to control them?
I have heard that getting a ecu replacement is a bad thing.
Will the S-AFC be able to control secondaries?
Would the e-manage by Greddy be a better choice for controlling secondaries?
Also instead of secondaries could I just upgrade to 1600's? If I do this will the S-AFC be ok here?
For my upgrades I am told that I will need secondary injectors. So my question to everyone is this. What is the best way to control them?
I have heard that getting a ecu replacement is a bad thing.
Will the S-AFC be able to control secondaries?
Would the e-manage by Greddy be a better choice for controlling secondaries?
Also instead of secondaries could I just upgrade to 1600's? If I do this will the S-AFC be ok here?
#2
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Re: Best way to control secondaries
Originally posted by sjordan
For my upgrades I am told that I will need secondary injectors.
For my upgrades I am told that I will need secondary injectors.
I have heard that getting a ecu replacement is a bad thing.
Also instead of secondaries could I just upgrade to 1600's? If I do this will the S-AFC be ok here?
Last edited by NZConvertible; 08-05-02 at 03:47 PM.
#5
What R U thinking self?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who says a S-AFC will not control more than 1000cc Secondaries? I'm not questioning you; I just want to know thats a fact, I planned on getting 1100cc injectors and using a S-AFC, should I scale down to 1000's? My ECU has been reprogrammed to run at 83% duty cycle, does that make a difference?
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: dallas,texas
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok mods as of right now:
Street Port
Cone intake
HKS BOV
Mods this week:
Downpipe
TestPipe
HKS Catback exhaust
FCD
Walboro Fuel Pump
Cold Air Box
Future Mod:
Upgraded Turbo
Greddy FMIC
Electronic Boost Controller
So as you can see I am doing all those mod's this weekend I figure that I should do the fuel mods before I do the Turbo Upgrade.
So if you guys had this setup what would you do for fuel upgrading? I rather not run a Haltech.
BTW this is all on a 1990 TII and the engine was rebuilt about 7,000 miles ago by Don Marvel (marvelspeed.com)
Street Port
Cone intake
HKS BOV
Mods this week:
Downpipe
TestPipe
HKS Catback exhaust
FCD
Walboro Fuel Pump
Cold Air Box
Future Mod:
Upgraded Turbo
Greddy FMIC
Electronic Boost Controller
So as you can see I am doing all those mod's this weekend I figure that I should do the fuel mods before I do the Turbo Upgrade.
So if you guys had this setup what would you do for fuel upgrading? I rather not run a Haltech.
BTW this is all on a 1990 TII and the engine was rebuilt about 7,000 miles ago by Don Marvel (marvelspeed.com)
#7
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Rpeck
Who says a S-AFC will not control more than 1000cc Secondaries? I'm not questioning you; I just want to know thats a fact, I planned on getting 1100cc injectors and using a S-AFC, should I scale down to 1000's?
Who says a S-AFC will not control more than 1000cc Secondaries? I'm not questioning you; I just want to know thats a fact, I planned on getting 1100cc injectors and using a S-AFC, should I scale down to 1000's?
My ECU has been reprogrammed to run at 83% duty cycle, does that make a difference?
Trending Topics
#8
What R U thinking self?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I was told is that; the stock ECU is programed to run a MAX duty cycle of ~55-63% A aftermarket, or in my case reprgrammed ECU can be tuned to raise the max duty cycle of the EFI system. My ECU is now programmed to run at a absoulute max of %83 duty cycle if needed. And that should only kick in that high if I run around ~18 PSI of boost. So if a stock setup is set at 60% duty with 550cc injectors and the S-AFC is tuned to at +/- %50 that would be a max of 1100cc’s.
However if the ECU is allowing %80 of the normal duty cycle, the S-AC at +50 should be able to control at least 1300cc’s worth of injectors. Does any of that make sence? Also I was told you should NOT exceed 85% duty cycle do to the heat produced only, The ND injectors RX’s use are very accurate to all extreems, but will not hold the heat of a constant high duty cycle.
However if the ECU is allowing %80 of the normal duty cycle, the S-AC at +50 should be able to control at least 1300cc’s worth of injectors. Does any of that make sence? Also I was told you should NOT exceed 85% duty cycle do to the heat produced only, The ND injectors RX’s use are very accurate to all extreems, but will not hold the heat of a constant high duty cycle.
#9
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Rpeck
What I was told is that; the stock ECU is programed to run a MAX duty cycle of ~55-63%
What I was told is that; the stock ECU is programed to run a MAX duty cycle of ~55-63%
So if a stock setup is set at 60% duty with 550cc injectors and the S-AFC is tuned to at +/- %50 that would be a max of 1100cc’s.
If you’re installing larger injectors, you tune them down (reducing pulsewidth), to correct for their higher flow. To get the same quantity of fuel from an 1100cc/min injector as a 550cc/min injector, you’d have to use a –50% correction, which is the max the S-AFC can do. This will not give you the ability to go any leaner, so you miss out on some tuning opportunity. Factory tuning is always on the rich side, so leaning it out a bit means more power.
However if the ECU is allowing %80 of the normal duty cycle, the S-AC at +50 should be able to control at least 1300cc’s worth of injectors.
Also I was told you should NOT exceed 85% duty cycle do to the heat produced only, The ND injectors RX’s use are very accurate to all extreems, but will not hold the heat of a constant high duty cycle.
#10
What R U thinking self?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I am not sure how much sense this makes, but this is what my head is thinking; Lets use 60% for the stock # and 80% for the modified ECU # .. just for simplicity.
Stock ECU set at 60% duty cycle no S-AFC adjustments = 550cc of fuel.
Stock ECU set at 60% duty cycle with full +50 on S-AFC = Control of in theroy up to 1100cc.
Modded ECU set at 80% no S-AFC adjustments = 660cc in fuel the 20% gives you another 110cc’s of fuel in theroy. More duty=more fuel right?
Modded ECU set at 80% +50 on S-AFC gives you 1320cc’s of fuel push. Or should be capable of contling close to 1300cc’s
Am, I comepletely off on how all this works? More duty pushed more fuel correct? More Duty + S-AFC should push even more fuel.?
I don't have a great grasp on EFI systems .. but his just makes sense to me. Isn't this kinda how stand alone systems can contol so much fuel? much the same way?
Stock ECU set at 60% duty cycle no S-AFC adjustments = 550cc of fuel.
Stock ECU set at 60% duty cycle with full +50 on S-AFC = Control of in theroy up to 1100cc.
Modded ECU set at 80% no S-AFC adjustments = 660cc in fuel the 20% gives you another 110cc’s of fuel in theroy. More duty=more fuel right?
Modded ECU set at 80% +50 on S-AFC gives you 1320cc’s of fuel push. Or should be capable of contling close to 1300cc’s
Am, I comepletely off on how all this works? More duty pushed more fuel correct? More Duty + S-AFC should push even more fuel.?
I don't have a great grasp on EFI systems .. but his just makes sense to me. Isn't this kinda how stand alone systems can contol so much fuel? much the same way?
#11
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sinking Spring Pa.
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to say that going stand-alone (Haltech) fuel injection was the best thing I have done to the car. It runs great and you never have to worry about running out of fuel. Im running 550cc primaries and 1600cc secondaries and it runs great . If your planning on doing alot more work to the car I suggest going this way, if not then a piggy back computer will be fine.
#12
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Rpeck
Well, I am not sure how much sense this makes, but this is what my head is thinking; Lets use 60% for the stock # and 80% for the modified ECU # .. just for simplicity.
Well, I am not sure how much sense this makes, but this is what my head is thinking; Lets use 60% for the stock # and 80% for the modified ECU # .. just for simplicity.
The stated size in the injector (e.g. 550cc/min) is the flow you’d get if the injector is held open, i.e. a duty cycle of 100%. So if that injector is pulsed at 50% duty cycle, you should get around half that amount (275cc/min).
To correct for larger injectors, you need to make the engine think it’s getting less air than it is so it reducing the pulsewidth accordingly. So if you replace the 550’s with 720’s, without correction you’ll get 720/550 = 31% too much fuel. By telling the engine it’s only getting 550/720 = 76% of the air it actually is (by applying a 100-76 = -24% correction) the amount of fuel injected is correct. Note that the duty cycle is completely irrelevant in this calculation! It’s only the size of the injectors that matter.
1100cc/min injectors would require a –50% base correction, before any tuning is done. But you won’t be able to tune them down any further, which might be a limitation.
#13
What R U thinking self?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I KNOW the duty cycle is not a set number. I was just using set/round numbers for simplicity. But the MAX duty cycle is, I am sure very close to a set number. I think I am going to go with 1000cc injectors to be safe. I am damn glad I haven't ordered them yet. I am ordering them on Wendsday of this week.. Doa!
I understand what you are saying & I am alot more clear on this subject now, thank you.
Now in saying that I still have the idea that; even if a aftermarket ECU only gives you a 10% boost in duty cycle .. that is 10% more Fuel! correct?
Or does duty cycle incorperate the A/F mixture into the equasion? If I have a higher "max" duty, is the system going to put in a higher load of air? or is it just putting in more gas? Now I am speaking it terms of optimal MAX duty cycle.. i know the injectores are NOT stuck at 80%
I understand what you are saying & I am alot more clear on this subject now, thank you.
Now in saying that I still have the idea that; even if a aftermarket ECU only gives you a 10% boost in duty cycle .. that is 10% more Fuel! correct?
Or does duty cycle incorperate the A/F mixture into the equasion? If I have a higher "max" duty, is the system going to put in a higher load of air? or is it just putting in more gas? Now I am speaking it terms of optimal MAX duty cycle.. i know the injectores are NOT stuck at 80%
#14
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Rpeck
...does duty cycle incorperate the A/F mixture into the equasion? If I have a higher "max" duty, is the system going to put in a higher load of air? or is it just putting in more gas?
...does duty cycle incorperate the A/F mixture into the equasion? If I have a higher "max" duty, is the system going to put in a higher load of air? or is it just putting in more gas?
The duty cycle is just the percentage of the time the injector is open. At 6000rpm, one revolution takes 10ms, and the injectors are fired once per revolution. If the injector pulsewidth is 3ms, that’s a 30% duty cycle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM