2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Best N/A engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #1  
RotaryMelon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 498
Likes: 2
From: Alberta, Canada
Best N/A engine?

I wasn't sure where to post.. but I figured 13b would best be known by the 2nd gen people..

I'm looking to discover the best N/A 13b out there..
is it the S5 because of high compression?

I want to get an aggressive street ported 13b and I'll carb it for my 1st gen..
But what block do I start with? (are there good seals for N/A power and whatnot?)

I dont know about engine building, but I imagine lots of you do

thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:06 PM
  #2  
Ottoman's Avatar
always modding
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 3
From: on a tiny island in the middle of a sea
P-port 3 rotor with RX8 rotors

or a P-Port 2 rotor with RX8 rotors with tall velocity stacks perched on top.. and balanced to rev out to 11,000 rpm

:p
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
RotaryMelon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 498
Likes: 2
From: Alberta, Canada
well.. I can dream lol..
I'd like something a little more practical, that wont cost an arm and a leg to build..
It's my DD in the summer, and a P-port will burn a hole through my wallet just in gas i'm sure..
Something that can be build out of a S4 or S5 13b?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:17 PM
  #4  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by RotaryMelon
I wasn't sure where to post.. but I figured 13b would best be known by the 2nd gen people..
I'm looking to discover the best N/A 13b out there..
is it the S5 because of high compression?
I want to get an aggressive street ported 13b and I'll carb it for my 1st gen..
If you are running a carb, then both the S4 and S5 NA engine will be running well below it's potential. The S5 especially considering most of it's power gain over the S4 is due to the VDI intake manifold. The S4 has a slightly less advanced intake manifold but it still contributes a significant amount (about 10HP over the 13B in the GSL-SE) to the overall total power.

If you want to carb something, your best bet is to build a 4 port 13B with S5 NA rotors. Port appropriately depending on your goals. If you intend on building with 6 port irons, then you are going to have a massive torque loss down low.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #5  
666cody666's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Canada,B.C
the difference between the s4 and s5 rotors is that the s5's are light and give you .3 more compression and for the housing on a N/A you have to grind out the baffles in the exhaust ports or just change them for turbo ons . so start with that, then for seals just get a seal kit with steel 2 piece apex seal and for the carb its up to you what you like. i am doing the exact same but fuel injecting it.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #6  
RotaryMelon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 498
Likes: 2
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
If you are running a carb, then both the S4 and S5 NA engine will be running well below it's potential. The S5 especially considering most of it's power gain over the S4 is due to the VDI intake manifold. The S4 has a slightly less advanced intake manifold but it still contributes a significant amount (about 10HP over the 13B in the GSL-SE) to the overall total power.

If you want to carb something, your best bet is to build a 4 port 13B with S5 NA rotors. Port appropriately depending on your goals. If you intend on building with 6 port irons, then you are going to have a massive torque loss down low.

you're saying if I took the S5 N/A engine.. street port and big weber..will have significantly less power than stock intake??
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #7  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by RotaryMelon
you're saying if I took the S5 N/A engine.. street port and big weber..will have significantly less power than stock intake??
You'll make more power, but probably less torque through the powerband. The power increase would be due to the steet port.

Running any 6 port engine with the aux ports open below 4K will result in a large loss of torque.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #8  
BurlesonRX7's Avatar
back from the land of v8s
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: Burleson Tx
OK i have a question after reading all this.

On my 87 I had, We wired the ports open. I didnt think it had lost that much power. What is a guess at the amount of lost torque (is that even a fair question?)?

Was i just that wrong on what I should have expected the torque to be? at the time I also had an F150 with a 302 so I may have been expecting less due to having a V8 also.


Thanks

Paul
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #9  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
I've run my S5 engine with the ports on and off below 4K on the dyno, the graph will easily show lower power when the ports are open, rather than closed. Forgot how much lower it was though.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #10  
RotaryMelon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 498
Likes: 2
From: Alberta, Canada
Hmm, you guys know alot more than me..
I'd like to go carb..
So what would be a good balance between tq and powerband.. 6 port or 4?
I still want a powerband, but i dont want to be gutless sub 4k
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #11  
Latin270's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2
From: Allentown, PA - Paterson, NJ
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
If you are running a carb, then both the S4 and S5 NA engine will be running well below it's potential. The S5 especially considering most of it's power gain over the S4 is due to the VDI intake manifold. The S4 has a slightly less advanced intake manifold but it still contributes a significant amount (about 10HP over the 13B in the GSL-SE) to the overall total power.

If you want to carb something, your best bet is to build a 4 port 13B with S5 NA rotors. Port appropriately depending on your goals. If you intend on building with 6 port irons, then you are going to have a massive torque loss down low.
Aaron is right! My last motor was an s5 w/ a 4 barrel Holley 600 in an FB. We got it to run beautifully and wow did she pull strong.........so I thought, until I got behind the wheel of an stock F.I s5 and the difference was tremendous.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #12  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by RotaryMelon
Hmm, you guys know alot more than me..
I'd like to go carb..
So what would be a good balance between tq and powerband.. 6 port or 4?
I still want a powerband, but i dont want to be gutless sub 4k
I suggest then building a 4 port engine with a street port.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #13  
~overdose~'s Avatar
Drift Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
well if your comparing a stock s4 vs a stock s5 then the s5 would be the best bet i beleve they have 165hp and 150ish trq and they redline at 8000rpm opposed to 7000rpm
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #14  
coxxoc's Avatar
Shooting for 500
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 833
Likes: 53
From: Redmond, WA
This question really depends on your budget and intended use for the car.

For a street car, a streetported n/a in an FB can be a ton of fun. A buddy of mine ported a S4 and put it in his 79 running S4 electronics (carb bad) and it was a hoot. You could break the rear end loose in the first three gears. It ran a 13.8 in the 1/4 mile too. The whole swap cost less than $1000 (remember to use a gslse front cover to make it easy).

Josh
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #15  
dguy's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 332
From: sb
To give you some perspective I just built a 4 port engine for a customer that put out 216bhp @ 7000 rpm.

Specs are as follows:

'89 4 port irons
86-88 High Compression rotors (read NA)
One of our largish street ports
"Oval" street exhaust ports

The carb we used was a 48 DCOE SP, with a 45 DCOE 9 we put out 194bhp @ 7000 rpm.

Oh, we had ~141 torque by 3000, peaking at 6000 with 166. This engine had more power to be had with more revs.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 11:18 PM
  #16  
RotaryMelon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 498
Likes: 2
From: Alberta, Canada
finally..
What should i go with? considering the hassle of hooking an ECU and EFI into a 1st gen..

Do they both have the same power, but distributed differently?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #17  
RX7freak08's Avatar
Wish he had a running rx7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Your going to have a hard time keeping up with Me and this other guy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
Jul 18, 2017 02:30 PM
rxmiles
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Aug 24, 2015 02:07 PM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Aug 15, 2015 01:38 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Aug 15, 2015 10:06 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.