2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

anyone dynoed a bone stock s4 na?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 04:49 PM
  #1  
slpin's Avatar
Thread Starter
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
anyone dynoed a bone stock s4 na?

i want to laugh at my daily driver...
complete stock as in stock air box with all the cats...
not with cone air intake... or straight pipe...
all i found are "basically stock" dynos... and it is modded...
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #2  
are_one's Avatar
Back from the dead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Laurel, MD
Somewhere around 110 to the rear. Our cars suck
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 06:42 PM
  #3  
Windsor, Ont
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ont
I dynoed 121
stock engine, no AC/PS/Emissions, Straight 2.5" exhaust.
1988 GXL with 225,000KM

but, I guess with the exhaust and the engine missing some stuff it's not stock.

Last edited by CompuBob; Mar 7, 2006 at 06:46 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #4  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
I've done baseline prior to going turbo on a bone stock '87, did 132 at the wheels, stock everything. IIRC it had about 60k miles.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #5  
bcool's Avatar
Rest In Peace Dave
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 1
From: Idaho
I got 143 to the ground with gutted cats, TII catback, wired open 6 ports and cone filter a while back.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #6  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
I've done baseline prior to going turbo on a bone stock '87, did 132 at the wheels, stock everything. IIRC it had about 60k miles.
So you had less than 10% drivetrain loss, something like 9.6%? Jeez.

I did 126 a long *** time ago with a header/high flow cat/catback/cone filter and frozen shut 6 ports, if that means anything to you. Should be close to stock dyno since the 6 ports were shut but I had mods too
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #7  
'87 turbo II's Avatar
Sleeper but still slow
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by bcool
I got 143 to the ground with gutted cats, TII catback, wired open 6 ports and cone filter a while back.
notice how he didn't ask for that at all.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #8  
Kyrasis6's Avatar
MazdaTruckin.com Founder
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: East Charlotte, NC
Mine definatly feels like it gets more then 110 to the wheels I would believe 120 to 130 on a strong motor. I drove some cars and dynod them at school that put 110 to the wheels and I'm sure my stock 87 would smoke them.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #9  
Alex6969's Avatar
The Silver Bullet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City/Springfield, MO
these cars do suck at hp, but it doesn't feel like it after 5k
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
Akaviri
Introduce yourself
6
Sep 9, 2015 03:56 PM
immanuel__7
Canadian Forum
5
Sep 2, 2015 08:26 AM
NJ-JDM
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
43
Aug 23, 2015 11:02 PM
Clacor
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 14, 2015 09:17 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.