any ill effects of takin off pulsation dampener?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: san francisco,Ca
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
any ill effects of takin off pulsation dampener?
will anything happen if i take that thing off? i have an aftermarket fpr and the stock fpr is gone
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: san francisco,Ca
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cymfc3s said no and reted said it's ok and amemiya confused me. let me rephrase the question "has anyone tried running their car without a pulsation dampener and did it/does it run ok?" thanks for the replies guys.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tried asking this same question a couple of weeks ago and couldn't get a straight answer either. I am in the parts gathering phase and am about to try it out. I am taking my PD off and replacing it with a 12mm x 1.25 banjo bolt with crush seals (ultimately ordered it from Earl's Performance direct, called them up and asked for a 12mm x 1.25 banjo bolt only without fittings).
My thinking is that if a car idles okay with a leaking PD which had a screw loose, then it probably will idle okay without a pd.
How much damping can a leaking pulsation damper damp with a broken diaphragm and loose screw?
Say that ten times fast.
Good luck on your quest for answers, I can't give you an answer today, but hopefully soon.
-john
My thinking is that if a car idles okay with a leaking PD which had a screw loose, then it probably will idle okay without a pd.
How much damping can a leaking pulsation damper damp with a broken diaphragm and loose screw?
Say that ten times fast.
Good luck on your quest for answers, I can't give you an answer today, but hopefully soon.
-john
#10
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
I can't give you a definite yes or no, but consider this: most fuel injected cars I've seen made in the last 20 years have had one. If it wasn't required, manufacturers wouldn't put it in.
To make an educated guess, if you have tiny consistent pressure fluctuations in the fuel rails, each injector pulse will inject a different amount of fuel, some a bit lean, some a bit rich, some OK. This will reduce the efficiency of the motor. The FPR will have no effect on all of this.
Just replace it with a stock one, they don't cost much. Remember the first one lasted 15 years...
To make an educated guess, if you have tiny consistent pressure fluctuations in the fuel rails, each injector pulse will inject a different amount of fuel, some a bit lean, some a bit rich, some OK. This will reduce the efficiency of the motor. The FPR will have no effect on all of this.
Just replace it with a stock one, they don't cost much. Remember the first one lasted 15 years...
Last edited by NZConvertible; 02-06-02 at 03:06 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: olympia,wash
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont really know about this....but,wont the long term effects of not running a pd negative on the injectors?i mean,could be a total non-issue,but would it not bombard them with a bunch of pressure waves[maybe not 'couse its a looped system],you know,like the water hammer syndrome in plumming when you apruptly shut a faucet off.[which is why,idealy,you should t off a short capped section of pipe,facing up,so it creates a air pocket wich will absorb the force].i dunno.personnaly,i'm going with a mpv pd.why mess with it when its so easy to still have the sytem work the way it was intended.and,like nzconvertible mentioned,if nothing else,i could see it messing with the mixture a li'll bit.
david
david
#13
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Node
true, but look at all of the unneeded extras mazdxa tossed on the RX-7, ya never know.
true, but look at all of the unneeded extras mazdxa tossed on the RX-7, ya never know.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Havre de Grace, MD
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe you and Node each have good points here. First of all, Mazda did see that all of those pieces were necessary. thing is, does your car have a PD (read Catalytic convertor)? If you removed the PD (again, catalytic convertor) and put a straight connection between, would the car run ok?
Back to the original question though, I think most of the pulsations would be taken care of by the head loss in the small fuel lines, but if you were building the car for someone else, would you or would you not want to cover your ***? I'd say the car should run alright without the pulsation damper, but I haven't altered mine.
Back to the original question though, I think most of the pulsations would be taken care of by the head loss in the small fuel lines, but if you were building the car for someone else, would you or would you not want to cover your ***? I'd say the car should run alright without the pulsation damper, but I haven't altered mine.
#15
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by RestoTII
I believe you and Node each have good points here. First of all, Mazda did see that all of those pieces were necessary. thing is, does your car have a PD (read Catalytic convertor)? If you removed the PD (again, catalytic convertor) and put a straight connection between, would the car run ok?
I believe you and Node each have good points here. First of all, Mazda did see that all of those pieces were necessary. thing is, does your car have a PD (read Catalytic convertor)? If you removed the PD (again, catalytic convertor) and put a straight connection between, would the car run ok?
The pulsations are very small in amplitude, so are unlikly to be affected by the lines, but the injector pulse is so small (a few milliseconds) that the small pressure difference would have an effect, admittedly a small one.
#16
AKA Poindexter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX; JABLAM!, WA; Iraq
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by fLyiNgOuFeR
cymfc3s said no and reted said it's ok and amemiya confused me. let me rephrase the question "has anyone tried running their car without a pulsation dampener and did it/does it run ok?" thanks for the replies guys.
cymfc3s said no and reted said it's ok and amemiya confused me. let me rephrase the question "has anyone tried running their car without a pulsation dampener and did it/does it run ok?" thanks for the replies guys.
#17
Lives on the Forum
The damper is designed to get rid of or minimize pulsations due to having only two fuel injectors per fuel rail.  In theory it's a good design - it's purely there to keep fuel flow consistent when the fuel injectors are firing.
In actuality, removing the PD does not affect fuel delivery - that's all that matters.  With a fuel pressure gauge, you'll see the fuel rail pulsations (if you've got the FP gauge sensor installed on one of the rails) increase, but this still doesn't affect fuel delivery.
This is based on my experience tuning an FC on the dyno with an A'PEXi S-AFC before&after PD removal - the fuel requirements were still the same before&after, which in my book means nothing harmful was done with the PD removal.
Now, what does this means?  It could be that the stock fuel rails are large enough to handle the added pulsations from the PD removal.  It could also be the stock rubber fuel hose is also helping dampen the pulsations.  Bottom line, PD removal doesn't affect fuel delivery - which is what we were after.
-Ted
In actuality, removing the PD does not affect fuel delivery - that's all that matters.  With a fuel pressure gauge, you'll see the fuel rail pulsations (if you've got the FP gauge sensor installed on one of the rails) increase, but this still doesn't affect fuel delivery.
This is based on my experience tuning an FC on the dyno with an A'PEXi S-AFC before&after PD removal - the fuel requirements were still the same before&after, which in my book means nothing harmful was done with the PD removal.
Now, what does this means?  It could be that the stock fuel rails are large enough to handle the added pulsations from the PD removal.  It could also be the stock rubber fuel hose is also helping dampen the pulsations.  Bottom line, PD removal doesn't affect fuel delivery - which is what we were after.
-Ted
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: san francisco,Ca
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thak you for clearing that up everyone. in conclusion i think that i'll take mine off. as long as it wont starv certain injectors it's a go for me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
10-01-15 07:58 PM