2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

86-88 have less hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #1  
böst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
86-88 have less hp?

Why do the earlier turbo II's have less hp?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 07:58 PM
  #2  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Less compression ratio - 8.6(?) versus 9.0
Less boost - 5.5psi versus 7.5psi
Crappy turbo/manifold design



-Ted
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
böst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
Wouldn't you want lower compression if you're going to boost the bejesus out of it? Or is that not the case with rotaries?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 08:19 PM
  #4  
Node's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 3
From: Stinson Beach, Ca
stock boost does not qualify as bajesus
its more of a safety measures, higher compression still makes more hp, just isn't good for boost.
But Series 4 (86-88, actually Turbo 2s were only 87+) were lighter, and actually have a better lbs/hp ratio
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maxim
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Feb 5, 2002 10:01 AM
Agent_D
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Feb 2, 2002 11:44 PM
Canibus
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Dec 13, 2001 04:43 PM
vaughnc
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Dec 12, 2001 11:01 AM
Canibus
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Dec 9, 2001 09:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.