2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Alcohol injection, water injection, octane, and your FC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 01:45 AM
  #151  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
Ah, here we go. Knew I saw it somewhere around here.

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/anybody-use-aquamist-121326/

Originally Posted by Rice Racing
I use a Spraying Systems USA air/water atomising nozzle (modified to my specs) it will completley atomize water at low pressures of 5 psi, it mixes air from the turbo with water from the tank, there is no blade errosion when using a high tech low pressure nozzle such as this.

My system costs about $500 Aus, for a Al tank, and all parts needed to complete the system.

And yes like aquamist I recomend best results are achieved when injecting before the turbo, there are no droping out issues."
Ah, Rice Racing once again. But then again, it's just one guy. But then again, he's been daily driving and circuit racing with 500rwhp on the same block for 5 years. Or something like that...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 01:52 AM
  #152  
rarson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally Posted by J-Rat
Googled it, and from the responses, it seems that injection before the compressor damages blades..
The problem is, the people who have done it before haven't done it right. Check out this thread for more information.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 01:55 AM
  #153  
rarson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally Posted by RETed
Aquamist?


-Ted
Aquamist's nozzles are not up to the task for optimal atomization. You can ask Larry himself about it if you'd like, he's on the WI forum linked to in my last post.

Last edited by rarson; Jul 24, 2005 at 01:57 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 01:56 AM
  #154  
sleeperfc's Avatar
MP T-70 = Fun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte and WCU
some people are running high $$ turbos.... why risk it. inject just after the IC if you can... if not then just before the TB is where lots put it.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #155  
ronbros3's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX.
HEY guys have you looked at turbobuicks.com on alky injection , also turbo mustang, like snow perfomance .com pretty impressive stuff, I have run alky /water/ Klotz for almost 3 yrs , afraid to go over 15 psi with out it, may change to just alky/Klotz in future. RON check out highly modified 420 hpin this same site how I did the nozzle install pics
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #156  
rarson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally Posted by sleeperfc
some people are running high $$ turbos.... why risk it. inject just after the IC if you can... if not then just before the TB is where lots put it.
The people interested in pre-turbo injection are likely to consider the compressor wheel as a wear item. I know I typically don't keep the same turbo on my car for very long (mileage-wise). I think it's silly to say that someone will spend the coin for an expensive turbo and not want to maximize the setup at the expense of a small cost increase.

Besides, as I think I mentioned before, the benefits are the greatest for someone who is already running their compressor off the map. In this case, it's usually a small or stock turbo that either will be upgraded soon or is on it's way out. In my case, I'm planning on trying it because I've otherwise reached the max of the turbo.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #157  
ronbros3's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX.
BOY you guys really lit the fire on this thread, anyway I think none of the available systems come close to what is needed like 500-1000 PSI injection presseures, to atomize the additional what ever you want to inject, so as to make it mix better in the chamber to control burn rate at more precise speed, also the injectors should be closer to the chamber , I know ! then you lose the cooling effect in the manifold conduits. but the best of all would be injectors directly into the chamber, but none of us are ready for that. just thinking ahead. RON
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 04:26 AM
  #158  
rarson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally Posted by ronbros3
BOY you guys really lit the fire on this thread, anyway I think none of the available systems come close to what is needed like 500-1000 PSI injection presseures, to atomize the additional what ever you want to inject, so as to make it mix better in the chamber to control burn rate at more precise speed, also the injectors should be closer to the chamber , I know ! then you lose the cooling effect in the manifold conduits. but the best of all would be injectors directly into the chamber, but none of us are ready for that. just thinking ahead. RON
No, the best water injection system would be a combination of nozzles at various points of the system. Mine would include one nozzle pre-turbo and either another nozzle pre-throttle body or individual port injection nozzles. I actually had an idea for using fuel injectors, but for a water/meth setup, the system and injectors would have to be designed for alcohol use.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #159  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
Idea. What about N2O injection? You need special insulated braided lines about 12$ a foot a nosel that wont frees at -380F and a container such as foam or anything n20 compliant easily found and a -380 aqua water pump found for 120$

N20 wont have the absorption property’s as water but will basically freeze everything so the air would be at least a 0F temp and the aluminum intake would be chilled and I wouldn’t doubt lower fuel temps.

Mercedes has a nice design where they run there fuel lines through the AC unit to cool the fuel.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 01:22 PM
  #160  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
Originally Posted by rarson
No, the best water injection system would be a combination of nozzles at various points of the system. Mine would include one nozzle pre-turbo and either another nozzle pre-throttle body or individual port injection nozzles. I actually had an idea for using fuel injectors, but for a water/meth setup, the system and injectors would have to be designed for alcohol use.
wouldnt you want the water to be injected before the IAT sensor? that way ANY change that the water has on the intake charge is read by the ecu? makes sense to me. . . thats why mine is in the stock position and the injectors are to be in the throttlebody elbow. . . on my FD.

the fuel injectors are a good idea. . . but itd be a little hard to find the correct size for all of those. . . PLUS you have to make them work via some ecu. . . totally custom IMO.

paul
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #161  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by iceblue
Idea. What about N2O injection? You need special insulated braided lines about 12$ a foot a nosel that wont frees at -380F and a container such as foam or anything n20 compliant easily found and a -380 aqua water pump found for 120$

N20 wont have the absorption property’s as water but will basically freeze everything so the air would be at least a 0F temp and the aluminum intake would be chilled and I wouldn’t doubt lower fuel temps.
NOS injected into the intake to cool the intake charge down???
You mean just like a regular NOS "dry" set-up?
You got other things to worry about than just cooling the intake charge down!


-Ted
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:16 PM
  #162  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
lol RETed you have a 1 track minde. GO FAST! I was refering to liquid nitrogen.

N02 I think it is I posted it backwords :-D
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:18 PM
  #163  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
liquid nitrogen (N2). Ah, iceblue, you crack me up.

edit: Oh, and your air wouldn't be 0F. I would be -321F. Your air would also be liquid at that state.

Last edited by gingenhagen; Jul 27, 2005 at 11:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #164  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
There's always LOx
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:28 PM
  #165  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
i like watching the guys laugh in unison
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #166  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
There's always LOx
And it's even a 5X better oxidizer than regular air. Though we should probably replace ordinary gasoline with liquid hydrogen for maximum power efficiency.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #167  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
Well I am not sure how fast it will cure the air but I promise it won’t be liquid. Or one of my computers would have been a solid brick last year. The nozzle would vaporize the N02 and the intake would be chilled with the slow steam of the nozzle vaporizing the N02. This is the exact opposite of water and more along the lines of a reveres pelter plate. N02 would also evaporate rapidly causing it not to effect combustion flame.

I could build the system for probably 350$ or so.

SonicRat what is LOx?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:39 PM
  #168  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
Originally Posted by iceblue
Well I am not sure how fast it will cure the air but I promise it won’t be liquid. Or one of my computers would have been a solid brick last year. The nozzle would vaporize the N02 and the intake would be chilled with the slow steam of the nozzle vaporizing the N02. This is the exact opposite of water and more along the lines of a reveres pelter plate. N02 would also evaporate rapidly causing it not to effect combustion flame.

I could build the system for probably 350$ or so.

SonicRat what is LOx?
Then that woiuldn't be liquid nitrogen. And LOx is liquid oxygen.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:43 PM
  #169  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by gingenhagen
And it's even a 5X better oxidizer than regular air. Though we should probably replace ordinary gasoline with liquid hydrogen for maximum power efficiency.
I always thought it was a bit higher than that. But you have a point, LH2 would go quite well.... (Unless you mean CGH2?)

I'd hate to be rear-ended though!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:44 PM
  #170  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
^ Sigh. Maybe I will pull out the equations again and how liquid nitrogen actually works, seeing as you do not seem to know.

Lox sounds interesting.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:44 PM
  #171  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
I always thought it was a bit higher than that. But you have a point, LH2 would go quite well....

I'd hate to be rear-ended though!
Well, I'm just going on there's 5 times as much oxygen in pure oxygen as in air. Haha.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:45 PM
  #172  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
ERRRRR CRASH and the rat goes boom!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #173  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
Originally Posted by iceblue
^ Sigh. Maybe I will pull out the equations again and how liquid nitrogen actually works, seeing as you do not seem to know.

Lox sounds interesting.
iceblue, I would love to see what kind of equations you're going to use to show me how liquid nitrogen works.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:49 PM
  #174  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
It would be long ones. But I have had a good bit of exsperiance using liquid nitrogen.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 11:52 PM
  #175  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
Originally Posted by iceblue
It would be long ones. But I have had a good bit of exsperiance using liquid nitrogen.
Go ahead.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.