2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

,96 A/R vs 1,00A/R?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-05, 04:47 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Faster Is Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
,96 A/R vs 1,00A/R?

setup 1: HKS cast manifold and to4B 60-1 with 0,96A/R turbine housing (undivided)

Setup2: Custom divided ss manifold and to4B 60-1 with 1,00A/R turbine housing (divided).

How much more hp setup 2 would make @15psi in mild ported S5 with all mods needed compared to setup 1.
And how much faster setup 2 would spool compared to setup 1?

Is the divided manifold worth of the extra money?
Old 04-01-05, 06:06 AM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
It depends on the divided manifold design...


-Ted
Old 04-01-05, 02:07 PM
  #3  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Faster Is Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manifold would be something like this..
Attached Images
File Type: bmp
manifo.bmp (87.9 KB, 98 views)
Old 04-01-05, 03:38 PM
  #4  
holley guy

 
mwatson184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: K.C. MO
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on how much money, you didn't post the prices.

Marques
Old 04-01-05, 05:25 PM
  #5  
I'll blow it up real good

iTrader: (1)
 
RX-Heven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Typically a divided manifold and turbine housing setup will make more power and spool faster. How much in both cases depends on manifold design like Ted stated. Some have claimed (crisspeed) as much as 30 hp or so but I have no first hand experience comparing the two with all else being equal.
Then again someone just made 520 rwhp on pump gas with a cast HKS log style manifold. Probably would have been even more with a divided design.

The manifold you have pictured; is that an "e-bay special" manifold? If so, I have seen one personally and I think it would cost you power and maybe even a turbo once some of the splatter and/or metal debris inside the p.o.s. works it way throught he turbine. Flanges are more crooked than my dick and the thing is bound to crack soon.

I can sauter something together in the dark and have it look better and be stronger than one of those.

General consensus agrees that a good manifold would have runners straight out of the ports for 2"-3" and be equal length with runner lengths of around 14".

Hope that helps

Last edited by RX-Heven; 04-01-05 at 05:28 PM.
Old 04-01-05, 06:00 PM
  #6  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
First point, don't waste your time with tube turbo exhaust manifolds unless you know what you are doing.
The cast manifold is stronger and more reliable.
Most tube turbo exhaust manifolds will fail due to extreme heat and weight of the turbo.

Second, most tube turbo exhuast manifolds are badly designed.
The pic you supplied has (one) bad wastegate paths - this makes for inefficient WG operation and will cause boost creep if the WG is too small.



-Ted
Old 04-02-05, 03:01 AM
  #7  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Faster Is Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the enlightening info. BTW the manifold in the picture is not mine(was going to buy something like that). I think it´s best for me to stick into the HKS cast and go with the ,96A/R turbine housing. I was hoping to get near 400rwhp@15psi but if I´m lucky I should see ~350rwhp@15psi with setup 1..right? but not much more than that..?

BTW I DON´T know what I doing.. That´s why I´m asking these "stupid" questions to learn more about these things. Lucky me I don´t have to built my car alone..

Last edited by Faster Is Faster; 04-02-05 at 03:10 AM.
Old 04-02-05, 05:44 AM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Faster Is Faster
I think it´s best for me to stick into the HKS cast and go with the ,96A/R turbine housing. I was hoping to get near 400rwhp@15psi but if I´m lucky I should see ~350rwhp@15psi with setup 1..right? but not much more than that..?
Depending on the turbo, those numbers are not unreasonable.


-Ted
Old 04-02-05, 05:46 AM
  #9  
Turbo Swamp Thing

iTrader: (2)
 
RXSevenSymphonies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: 195 Miles West of Bridgeport, WA
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uglier is uglier is your avatar...

There's a lot of learning to do about aftermarket turbo setups, keep asking questions and read tons.
Old 04-02-05, 02:11 PM
  #10  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Faster Is Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RXSevenSymphonies
Uglier is uglier is your avatar...

There's a lot of learning to do about aftermarket turbo setups, keep asking questions and read tons.
Hope this avatar pleases you more...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AXA
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
09-05-15 10:06 AM



Quick Reply: ,96 A/R vs 1,00A/R?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 PM.