What tranny and differential do you use.
08-15-02, 12:13 PM
#1
#1 F0RUM TROLL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What tranny and differential do you use.
What type of tranny and differential do you use on your turbo 20 B motors? T2? FD? Other? Custom? Pleas elist HP you make.
08-15-02, 02:21 PM
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,905
Received 2,648 Likes
on
1,874 Posts
i'm running stock t2 stuff right now, it should be fine until about 450lbsft or so.
mike
mike
08-15-02, 11:55 PM
#5
earning these was better
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Richardson TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by now
stock cosmo 20b trani here
tII diff.
hp should be at about 325 but hope to be at 450 soon.
matt
stock cosmo 20b trani here
tII diff.
hp should be at about 325 but hope to be at 450 soon.
matt
08-16-02, 09:46 AM
#7
Originally posted by MaTT_FoULk
Wouldn't that be an automatic? Yuck....
Wouldn't that be an automatic? Yuck....
the cosmo auto handles the power great and goes
like mad, it shifts at the red line and will spin the wheels
when it goes for 2nd.
I bet you cant change gears and keep the boost up
I can hold the brake and gas at the same time to build
good boost off the line, launching as good if not better
than a manual trani. It's truly better than I thought it would be
matt
Trending Topics
08-16-02, 02:35 PM
#11
Safety Guy
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apple Valley area in MN
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anyone considered using a 'vette gearbox? I believe there is one above the LT-1? called something like a "SW8" ? apparently it's a 6-sp but when you disconnect the sensors to it, it has no protection against going into reverse (if you're concerned about that).
08-16-02, 03:17 PM
#12
Old [Sch|F]ool
???
LT-1 was an engine from 1970, unless you want a Muncie 4-speed (not a bad idea, really) then it's not a good plan.
The LT1 from more recently is also an engine, not a transmission. In the Corvette it had a bulky, expensive ZF transmission, and in the Camabird it had a Borg-Warner T56.
LT-1 was an engine from 1970, unless you want a Muncie 4-speed (not a bad idea, really) then it's not a good plan.
The LT1 from more recently is also an engine, not a transmission. In the Corvette it had a bulky, expensive ZF transmission, and in the Camabird it had a Borg-Warner T56.
08-16-02, 05:34 PM
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,905
Received 2,648 Likes
on
1,874 Posts
Originally posted by peejay
In the Corvette it had a bulky, expensive ZF transmission, and in the Camabird it had a Borg-Warner T56.
In the Corvette it had a bulky, expensive ZF transmission, and in the Camabird it had a Borg-Warner T56.
mike
08-17-02, 12:53 PM
#14
Old [Sch|F]ool
Hell then just go for a Muncie M-22... straight cut gears, 2.2:1 First, 1:1 Fourth, and they could handle big-block torque and the synchros could handle 7000rpm shifts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post