Sizing 3 turbos for a 3 rotor
Sizing 3 turbos for a 3 rotor
Ok, I'm just thinking out of my *** here... trying to be original, insane, watever you want to call it.
I need to find 3 smaller turbos. I was thinking of T3/T4 hybrids... 60-1 HiFi front side and a T3 stage 3 exhaust wheel side with internal wastegate.
I'm not saying I'm doing this, but its a possibility, plus I thought it may start up some conversation in this section.
Also, would staggering the a/r on the exhaust side, say, a .48, .63 and a .82.... would that be a bad idea. the lower ar would run out on the top end, but the larger ones would be there to support top end. I'm just thinking that if you did this, you would always have 2 turbos in their power range. Or would it be better to just go wth 3 turbos with the same AR. This won't be a sequential system, but all turbos would be running at the same time... essentially, one turbo per housing.... and with an internal wastegate, the manifold would be easy (relatively)
What would the perfect turbo be for a 1 rotor application?
I don't want to boost more than 20 psi, and would like to stay at 15... shooting for 650 rwhp. Feedback?
I'll probably go with a single turbo, but a 3 turbo setup would just be so damn cool!
I need to find 3 smaller turbos. I was thinking of T3/T4 hybrids... 60-1 HiFi front side and a T3 stage 3 exhaust wheel side with internal wastegate.
I'm not saying I'm doing this, but its a possibility, plus I thought it may start up some conversation in this section.
Also, would staggering the a/r on the exhaust side, say, a .48, .63 and a .82.... would that be a bad idea. the lower ar would run out on the top end, but the larger ones would be there to support top end. I'm just thinking that if you did this, you would always have 2 turbos in their power range. Or would it be better to just go wth 3 turbos with the same AR. This won't be a sequential system, but all turbos would be running at the same time... essentially, one turbo per housing.... and with an internal wastegate, the manifold would be easy (relatively)
What would the perfect turbo be for a 1 rotor application?
I don't want to boost more than 20 psi, and would like to stay at 15... shooting for 650 rwhp. Feedback?
I'll probably go with a single turbo, but a 3 turbo setup would just be so damn cool!
Where can you find information on these Garret turbos? 1200 bones each, thats a bit too much dough.... but it would be badass.....
What about a set of 16g or 20g turbos... like the DSM guys use? Any thoughts on that?
And what about staggering the A/R like I described above?
What about a set of 16g or 20g turbos... like the DSM guys use? Any thoughts on that?
And what about staggering the A/R like I described above?
Originally posted by protlewski
Hey go out buy 3 grand national turbs for like a grand and have fun till they break. lol
Hey go out buy 3 grand national turbs for like a grand and have fun till they break. lol
Kind of just thinking out load... but wouldn't it be cool?
Trending Topics
Three spinning triangles
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Been all around this world and still call Texas home (Ft Worth)
Originally posted by protlewski
Hey go out buy 3 grand national turbs for like a grand and have fun till they break. lol
Hey go out buy 3 grand national turbs for like a grand and have fun till they break. lol
However they might be the exception not the rule to GNX's
Hyperex forwarded me this awesome 20B triple turbo setup. its not quite what I'm going for, but its freaking cool as all HELL, and it belongs in this thread 
I'm sure most of you have seen this, but its time to post some drool
material 

I'm sure most of you have seen this, but its time to post some drool
material 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
note the stock ignition, ignitor boxes over where the brake master would be if the car had one. they are either running stock ecu or motec, and no brakes (!)
mike
(!)
mike
(!)
Originally posted by j9fd3s
note the stock ignition, ignitor boxes over where the brake master would be if the car had one. they are either running stock ecu or motec, and no brakes (!)
note the stock ignition, ignitor boxes over where the brake master would be if the car had one. they are either running stock ecu or motec, and no brakes (!)
I am assuming here that pic is of a JC Cosmo engine bay due to its size, and it looks very similar (the pic is a bit dark to say the same as) to ours.
so, its right hand drive. There fore the brake booster is on the right (left in pic) behind the turbo out of sight I think (and if it is there, it would be tight). Igniters etc are on the left (right in pic)
so, its right hand drive. There fore the brake booster is on the right (left in pic) behind the turbo out of sight I think (and if it is there, it would be tight). Igniters etc are on the left (right in pic)
Originally posted by Bitchn7
I am assuming here that pic is of a JC Cosmo engine bay due to its size, and it looks very similar (the pic is a bit dark to say the same as) to ours.
so, its right hand drive. There fore the brake booster is on the right (left in pic) behind the turbo out of sight I think (and if it is there, it would be tight). Igniters etc are on the left (right in pic)
I am assuming here that pic is of a JC Cosmo engine bay due to its size, and it looks very similar (the pic is a bit dark to say the same as) to ours.
so, its right hand drive. There fore the brake booster is on the right (left in pic) behind the turbo out of sight I think (and if it is there, it would be tight). Igniters etc are on the left (right in pic)
Originally posted by RETed
A big hint is look at the shock towers.  If you don't know your own shocks towers by now, you should be shot.
-Ted
A big hint is look at the shock towers.  If you don't know your own shocks towers by now, you should be shot.

-Ted
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
LOL, I also may have to use a Tilton pedal assembly because it looks like the SPO rules require the roll cage to extend through the firewall where the master cylinder is. Hopefully I am reading too much into the rules, as I really like my power brakes.
LOL, I also may have to use a Tilton pedal assembly because it looks like the SPO rules require the roll cage to extend through the firewall where the master cylinder is. Hopefully I am reading too much into the rules, as I really like my power brakes.
mike
(*)
Duh, well actually now that I look, you can see the bloody headlight kit to show its an RX-7, my **** up.
Oh, and the radiator on an angle should have been a give away. The engine bay looks very long in the photo, never though the 7 bay was that long, duh
Oh, and the radiator on an angle should have been a give away. The engine bay looks very long in the photo, never though the 7 bay was that long, duh
Originally posted by 13BAce
That's the one annoying thing about FC's: You can't go too far from the motor with a turbo without hitting the strut towers.
That's the one annoying thing about FC's: You can't go too far from the motor with a turbo without hitting the strut towers.

In my experience 1st gens have the most space followed by 2nd gens with the 3rd gens having the least unless you've ever had to stuff a large single on a 13B in a Miata chassis!

crispeed
87 Rx-7 TII
9.204@150.47mph
2600lbs
un-tubbed
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM








