1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Watts Link: vague feeling. OEM vs Urethane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-13, 11:15 AM
  #1  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Watts Link: vague feeling. OEM vs Urethane?

Since my last track day in December I've been noticing that the rear end of my 85' has an oddly vague feeling about it in the turns around town. It's like it is about to step out while I'm going around a turn, but it can be felt at low speeds and only happens for a quick moment.

Today I gave the rear of my car a quick 'hip check' and I went wide eyes as the rear kept shaking side to side like a fish for a few seconds. I thought this motion was from the tire sidewalls, but it is accompanied by a soft clunking sound.

Bouncing up and down on the back won't produce this motion. So the shocks seem to be doing their job.

It's raining today, but after it dries out, I'm going to jack up the car and take a look around the watts linkage bushings.
They are original, so likely gone from the the track day abuse and may have been a factor in my 3 spinouts around the downhill off-camber turn.
(That and my inexperience)

Full RB suspension. But I didn't touch the watts bushings.

Tha Mazdatrix site recommends keeping OEM rubber bushings, but that means buying the entire link components and is very $$$$.
Urethane bushings are much cheaper than getting new links with the rubber pressed in.

Ride quality is not an issue for me since this is my track car in training.

Does anyone have an opinion between OEM vs Urethane bushings for Watts Linkage?
Old 03-08-13, 11:35 AM
  #2  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I don't have a shop press so what's the best way of removing rubber bushings at home?

Drill? Throw them in a fire? Take the links to a shop that has a press?
Old 03-08-13, 11:36 AM
  #3  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,800
Received 2,574 Likes on 1,830 Posts
i looked at the Watts in mine, and you need a soft bushing in there.

since the upper links are shorter than the lower links the pinion angle actually changes as the suspension moves up and down, IE the axle actually needs to pivot.

so the watts links actually need to rotate a little, or if you like its a multi axis pivot.

a firmer bushing is actually going to make it harder for things to pivot, so it'll make things worse.

back in the olden days, the Pro7 people used to buy new watts links, and then use a jamb nut so the links were as loose as possible.
Old 03-08-13, 12:20 PM
  #4  
its supposed to do that

 
flight_of_pain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Going to a tri-link and using urethane bushings in the watts makes an amazing difference. Even farther with a tri-link and panhard is also a noticeable improvement.

Isaac
Old 03-08-13, 02:36 PM
  #5  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Does anyone have a preferred source to get a tri-link or panhard bar?

I'm up for cutting and welding if need be.

I remember hearing talking in the past about how strange the watts link can be, even binding under track conditions. Maybe now is as good time as any to consider alternatives.
Old 03-08-13, 07:27 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
GySgtFrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Stafford, Ks.
Posts: 385
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
An adjustable panhard would be the way to go IMHO.

If set up correctly they shouldn't introduce any bind. The bar has to be parallel to the axle in both planes. Most use a Spherical or Heim joint to prevent any bind as the axle cycles through it's range of motion. You just have to make sure the joints don't hit and bind when the axle moves through it's arc of motion.

There is a slight amount of movement introduced when the axle moves up and down from the centered position, which is why a longer bar is better than a short bar (less movement).

I got my bar through G Force Engineering, unfortunately he retired and they're no longer available. Unless he still has some old stock on hand?

I haven't had any problems with mine, but I probably haven't pushed it as hard as it sounds like you have. They're not that hard to fabricate yourself if you have the patience to do lots of measuring and fitting.

The three link is strictly custom as far as I know, at least I didn't see anyone selling kits. I researched what guys are running on the track and planned mine accordingly. I'm using equal length arms to get rid of the pinion angle change, there are different schools of thought on arm lengths and angles.

3 Link Rear Suspension System

This is one of the links I was looking at when researching my mods. Also read up on 4 links, but they were a lot more complicated with very little advantage. The good part about 3 links in our cars is that we have no back seat, therefor losing rear seat room is not an issue. Just my thoughts.
Old 03-12-13, 11:47 PM
  #7  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I finally got the chance to put the car up into the air to check things out. Oh wow, I can actually pull bits of rubber out from the upper and lower links. It's amazing what a few track days will do to your car!

So I'm going to rebuild the entire rear suspension now.

It's about 5x's the price to go with rubber bushings vs polyurethane. So I'll give the urethane a try although it's not recommended. Urethane has been good in my other cars. I can always go back to rubber bushings in the future.

I like the idea of fabricating my own panhard bar.

I found lots of videos on youtube showing home made tricks for pressing out old bushings.
Old 03-13-13, 06:01 PM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (1)
 
elwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 1,540
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary-MG
Does anyone have a preferred source to get a tri-link or panhard bar?

I'm up for cutting and welding if need be.

I remember hearing talking in the past about how strange the watts link can be, even binding under track conditions. Maybe now is as good time as any to consider alternatives.
As was already mentioned, going to a tri-link or Panhard will probably require some design and fab work on your part. As for a place to buy suspension tubes and rod ends, I recommend PitStopUSA. They have good prices and good customer service.
Old 03-13-13, 09:55 PM
  #9  
Always Wanting to Learn

iTrader: (49)
 
DreamInRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge, Minnesota
Posts: 3,078
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
I've looked into going with a Panhard bar and at the tri-link setups. The best discussion I've seen so far can be found here: FB Rear suspension Geometry Problems/Options/Solutions
and here: Panhard bar setup

I'm working with a company to develop a readily available Panhard bar for the first gens here - hopefully it works out
Old 03-14-13, 11:02 AM
  #10  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,800
Received 2,574 Likes on 1,830 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary-MG
So I'll give the urethane a try although it's not recommended.
the whole problem with the rear suspension is that the upper arms are not parallel to each other, so when the axle has to move in roll, it is actually trying to twist things, on the eat coast cars the upper arms come out of the body.

so in the stock configuration the rubber being soft is kind of key, using a harder bushing makes it worse.
Old 03-14-13, 11:42 AM
  #11  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
the whole problem with the rear suspension is that the upper arms are not parallel to each other, so when the axle has to move in roll, it is actually trying to twist things, on the eat coast cars the upper arms come out of the body.

so in the stock configuration the rubber being soft is kind of key, using a harder bushing makes it worse.
I've been going through a lot of the old threads on this, and this is the first time someone has (or I finally caught on) actually pointed out that the upper arms at not parallel to one another. Most other comments point out that the top links are too short and the watts is off-centered, but not being in the same plane to one another just horrible. That would explain the need for some give. Very sloppy, un-Mazdalike engineering. Something accountants would push through a design meeting.

No one seems to make kits for the Tri-link mod anymore. So what few images I have found seem pretty straight forward. I like the idea of having a long top link attached to the top of the diff housing that runs straight through a hole in the cargo box area. I'll make it with adjustable rod ends so I can set the pinion angle. This would also mean getting rid of the watts since the new link will interfere with the watts. So Panhard bar it is.

I can then comfortably use the polyurethane bushings for the bottom links once the tri-link is in.

This will take a while for me to perform. But I'll document everything I do with pictures and try to post them in a new thread in a way that makes sense.
Old 03-14-13, 11:49 AM
  #12  
its supposed to do that

 
flight_of_pain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That is pretty much the exact same plan that I have. Rather than a curved tri-link that bolts into the driveline tunnel, a straight shot through the cargo area to tie into the cross-brace behind the seats.

Isaac
Old 03-14-13, 12:04 PM
  #13  
its supposed to do that

 
flight_of_pain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Something like so:
Name:  1523043579033406361S600x600Q85_zps0d76cca0.jpg
Views: 1076
Size:  25.8 KB

Name:  1523043404033406361S600x600Q85_zps8381c446.jpg
Views: 1104
Size:  45.9 KB

Name:  1523043212033406361S600x600Q85_zpsd119211f.jpg
Views: 1349
Size:  52.6 KB

Name:  1523043100033406361S600x600Q85_zpseb6d7b3e.jpg
Views: 1480
Size:  35.5 KB

I would personally add quite a bit more bracing on the bracket inside the car, perhaps triangulate it out to the bottom of the B pillar area, or to the top of the framerails where they start to go up the "hump" there.

Isaac
Old 03-14-13, 03:51 PM
  #14  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,800
Received 2,574 Likes on 1,830 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary-MG
I've been going through a lot of the old threads on this, and this is the first time someone has (or I finally caught on) actually pointed out that the upper arms at not parallel to one another. Most other comments point out that the top links are too short and the watts is off-centered, but not being in the same plane to one another just horrible. That would explain the need for some give. Very sloppy, un-Mazdalike engineering. Something accountants would push through a design meeting.

No one seems to make kits for the Tri-link mod anymore. So what few images I have found seem pretty straight forward. I like the idea of having a long top link attached to the top of the diff housing that runs straight through a hole in the cargo box area. I'll make it with adjustable rod ends so I can set the pinion angle. This would also mean getting rid of the watts since the new link will interfere with the watts. So Panhard bar it is.

I can then comfortably use the polyurethane bushings for the bottom links once the tri-link is in.

This will take a while for me to perform. But I'll document everything I do with pictures and try to post them in a new thread in a way that makes sense.

yes, the top links could be longer too, the competition catalog sells you longer upper links and an axle housing with different mounting points.

so if you go out to the car, and put a measuring device on the pinion flange, and just move the axle in roll, you'll find that the pinion actually moves in an arc.

this means that the upper links have to twist, and so does the watts.

so the trick to making the rear work is to make all the pivots softer, and not harder. its also why the panhard works so well, it gets rid of some binding.
Old 03-25-13, 12:41 AM
  #15  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Just thought I'd drop in an update.

Since I already had the polyurethane bushings ordered, I decided to go ahead and install all of them just to see how they would be. Everything in the rear is now poly including the swaybar, all 4 links and the watts linkage.

Removing the rubber from the linkages was a real bear. A drill press is a must since it helps to have both hands free. Am afraid that there is no easy method but to mutilate the rubber with a drill bit and then use a spinning wire brush (drill press again) to clean out the bores. The rubber is either glued of fused to the links. I tried burning one end, but that's just stupid, time consuming and lots of black smoke (did it at night). If I had a shop, I would not be offering this as a service.

The Energy Suspension polyurethane bushings installed without a problem.

There is a noticeable increase road noise and vibration being transmitted up through the harder bushings. But I like it! I have a much better feel for what the rear end is doing. The vagueness that I had from the rubber bushings is completely gone. That sudden snap to the left and right are gone as well.

I took my RX7 on a test run through some mountain roads and then along some nice tight up and down twisties through a nearby neighborhood of 5 million dollar homes. Many of the turns are bumpy and off camber. So I was going fairly aggressively trying to give the rear end a work out. Pedestrian free hour.

I didn't notice anything bad about the rear. No bind ups, nothing unusual to report. My car isn't very low. Perhaps my car rides high enough so binding isn't occurring. I'm using all RB springs and swaybars. My shocks are still OEM style. The car corners flat, much of the interior is stripped, but I need to get away from the stock 13" rims.

So far, for the street I think poly is great.
I'll have to see how things go out on the track.
I'll keep the idea of going 3-link + panhard in mind.
But until I spot any issues, I will keep riding on the poly.
Old 03-25-13, 07:18 AM
  #16  
3rd time's a charm!!
 
scottmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary-MG
Just thought I'd drop in an update.

Since I already had the polyurethane bushings ordered, I decided to go ahead and install all of them just to see how they would be. Everything in the rear is now poly including the swaybar, all 4 links and the watts linkage.

Removing the rubber from the linkages was a real bear. A drill press is a must since it helps to have both hands free. Am afraid that there is no easy method but to mutilate the rubber with a drill bit and then use a spinning wire brush (drill press again) to clean out the bores. The rubber is either glued of fused to the links. I tried burning one end, but that's just stupid, time consuming and lots of black smoke (did it at night). If I had a shop, I would not be offering this as a service.

The Energy Suspension polyurethane bushings installed without a problem.

There is a noticeable increase road noise and vibration being transmitted up through the harder bushings. But I like it! I have a much better feel for what the rear end is doing. The vagueness that I had from the rubber bushings is completely gone. That sudden snap to the left and right are gone as well.

I took my RX7 on a test run through some mountain roads and then along some nice tight up and down twisties through a nearby neighborhood of 5 million dollar homes. Many of the turns are bumpy and off camber. So I was going fairly aggressively trying to give the rear end a work out. Pedestrian free hour.

I didn't notice anything bad about the rear. No bind ups, nothing unusual to report. My car isn't very low. Perhaps my car rides high enough so binding isn't occurring. I'm using all RB springs and swaybars. My shocks are still OEM style. The car corners flat, much of the interior is stripped, but I need to get away from the stock 13" rims.

So far, for the street I think poly is great.
I'll have to see how things go out on the track.
I'll keep the idea of going 3-link + panhard in mind.
But until I spot any issues, I will keep riding on the poly.
I'm relieved to see some additional positive feedback regarding urethane bushings in the watts link. I posed this question last year before ordering the RB suspension kit and the Energy Suspension bushings for my 81 GX, but didn't get a whole lot of feedback. I read on Mazdatrix that they recommended sticking to rubber in the watts link. AaronCake had replied that he had gone all urethane in the past without any problems, so that was good enough for me. I went ahead and changed all rubber for urethane in the front and rear as well as the full RB kit, urethane end-links in the front and Tokico HP's all around. I'm still restoring it so I haven't had a chance to take it out on the road yet. I still have the stock 13's on mine as well. I like the look of these original rims. It's unfortunate that they are only 13".
Old 03-25-13, 11:31 AM
  #17  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I think that the only thing I'm going to change is swapping out the OEM nut and lock washer to nylon lock nuts.

When I was test fitting the new bushings I noticed that they seemed fatter than the rubber and when the nut was torqued down the bracket would pinch the bushing so that when you rotated the link, the bushing stayed in place with the body of the car and the rotation was along the link collar and the bushing rather than the bolt and metal sleeve running through the bushing. (run on sentence)

The nylon lock nuts will allow me to NOT over tighten the bolts so that the link can rotate along the metal sleeve as intended.

It can be my imagination, but I really do like the feedback I'm getting from the firmer rear links. I'll know more after I spin out a few times, LOL.
Old 03-25-13, 03:40 PM
  #18  
Waffles - hmmm good

iTrader: (1)
 
t_g_farrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Wylie, N.C.
Posts: 8,783
Received 282 Likes on 232 Posts
I did the full polys up front and the polys only on the watts linkage in the rear. I still have the old
original rubber in the 4 locating links. It feels very good for me. I do get lots more road noise and
rear end noise coming through the from the rear. I'm tempted to do the links as well and use
the nylon locks nuts to make sure the movement is freer.

Anyone know the specs for the nuts I would need to get?
Old 03-25-13, 06:49 PM
  #19  
GET OFF MY LAWN

iTrader: (1)
 
jgrewe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fla.
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
All that urethane is acting like a sway bar back there. The way things bind up when the car leans the upper links have to twist and shorten. Putting urethane in them I like putting on a stiffer bar. No rubber to flex.

The stock watts link is very well designed, it moves the rear pretty straight until it reaches the upper and lower limits. Its just too high.
Old 03-27-13, 10:12 AM
  #20  
√*(176400)

 
PETC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I second the reinforcement idea posted earlier regarding those photos of someone else's car. You're going to want much more transverse bracing on there, if it's aligned the way I think it was.
Old 03-27-13, 01:39 PM
  #21  
GET OFF MY LAWN

iTrader: (1)
 
jgrewe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fla.
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That upper link never has any side load from the rear end. Fore and aft, maybe up and down but side load isn't an issue.
Old 03-27-13, 01:47 PM
  #22  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,800
Received 2,574 Likes on 1,830 Posts
Originally Posted by PETC
I second the reinforcement idea posted earlier regarding those photos of someone else's car. You're going to want much more transverse bracing on there, if it's aligned the way I think it was.
its not, load is small on that...
Old 04-01-13, 09:02 PM
  #23  
Blood, Sweat and Rotors

iTrader: (1)
 
DriveFast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,742
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jgrewe
That upper link never has any side load from the rear end. Fore and aft, maybe up and down but side load isn't an issue.
Nice to see pics of my tri-link are still making the rounds. The panhard rod handles lateral location, it doesn't move much left to right. Heims in the 3rd link let it twist as needed. Haven't needed to add any more bracing but couldn't hurt. It's already stronger than Mazda's upper link brackets by a long shot.

Oh and with the heims it rattles like hell, would not recommend heims on the street. Use poly bushings instead.

Brad
Old 04-02-13, 11:59 AM
  #24  
the name is Stan

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by t_g_farrell
I did the full polys up front and the polys only on the watts linkage in the rear. I still have the old
original rubber in the 4 locating links. It feels very good for me. I do get lots more road noise and
rear end noise coming through the from the rear. I'm tempted to do the links as well and use
the nylon locks nuts to make sure the movement is freer.

Anyone know the specs for the nuts I would need to get?
I just ordered these lock nuts from McMasterCarr (awesome place for any hardware/tools).
I couldn't find these in the correct thread pitch any where in town. The quantities here are enough to take care of the 4-links and Watts. When I got under the car to remove to stock nuts to get a size, the center Watts nut had loosened itself, and I took it off with just my fingers. Doh!

Nylon Lock nuts:
M14x1.5 Qty 9 (one for the center Watts)
M12x1.5 Qty 4 (Watts link only)


Part# and order details:
94645A229 Zinc-Plated Steel Nylon-Insert Hex Locknut, Class 10, M12 Size, 1.5MM Pitch, 19MM Width, 12MM H, packs of 10 1 pack $6.27

90576A147 Metric Zinc-Plated Steel Nylon-Insert Locknut, Class 8, M14 Size, 1.5MM Pitch, 22MM W, 14MM H, packs of 10 1 pack $9.17

93475A300 Metric DIN 125 18-8 Stainless Steel Flat Washer, M14 Screw Size, 28MM OD, 2.3MM-2.7MM Thick, packs of 25 1 pack $7.13
Old 04-02-13, 03:46 PM
  #25  
Always Wanting to Learn

iTrader: (49)
 
DreamInRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge, Minnesota
Posts: 3,078
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
Thanks for the list! Now I can go on tonight and make a similar order.


Quick Reply: Watts Link: vague feeling. OEM vs Urethane?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.