Upper Strut Mount 1980
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Upper Strut Mount 1980
I just replaced the upper mounts on the front struts of my 80 and I can visually tell that camber is way off on one side. The Haynes manual says there should be marks but my mounts don't have any. I have noticed that the mounts do not fit centered in the hole. My question is, where should the wider gap be between the hole and the mount? I think that will fix my camber.
Thanks
Thanks
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mean take off the top nuts and drop the trut assembly down then rotate the mount?
I figured there would be a direction where the wide gap around the circle should be placed.
Thanks
I figured there would be a direction where the wide gap around the circle should be placed.
Thanks
#4
HeyHeyHey..Its the Goose
iTrader: (3)
You can adjust camber and caster with this plate. The idea is to get the same amount of camber and caster on both sides of the car. If you can't get the camber you want you can slot the cross member and fill it with a mig. If you need further caster adjustment you can change the tension struts around (I think; if not you can always force them to change).
If everything is out of whack and you can't get the car to pull strait. You might have body damage. Last I checked Maaco does body alignment for $50 in the door and the price goes up from there.
If everything is out of whack and you can't get the car to pull strait. You might have body damage. Last I checked Maaco does body alignment for $50 in the door and the price goes up from there.
#7
When I replaced my strut mounts I noticed there were no marks. I emailed the manufacturer (KYB I believe) and they told their mounts are symmetrical unlike the stock ones. No idea if that is right or not. My camber is visually different too.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
the stock/Mazda ones are visibly offset, so you don't really need the mark, or you could read the FSM and make your own
#11
84SE-EGI helpy-helperton
Agree with Qingdao - the reason why Mazda make these offset is to allow flexibility to adjust to differences in frame orientation and wheel/tire combinations. The OP will need to measure camber (or eyeball) and then try to get as close to even between both sides as possible. Given the manufacturing methods employed back in the early 1980's, this is not unusual to make mounts designed to fit a wide variation in tolerance.
In comparison, my brother has an Infiniti G35 coupe that has no adjustability in the front suspension arms or struts at all - because the car was built to such tight tolerances, when you replace an A-arm, it aligns to the frame perfectly (as long as the frame is straight).
Point being, you should adjust them to get as much neutral camber as possible on both sides.
In comparison, my brother has an Infiniti G35 coupe that has no adjustability in the front suspension arms or struts at all - because the car was built to such tight tolerances, when you replace an A-arm, it aligns to the frame perfectly (as long as the frame is straight).
Point being, you should adjust them to get as much neutral camber as possible on both sides.
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
most older cars have no adjustability, my MGB, Tr3, etc you can only do toe.
BMW's also, you can only do toe, and if a camber adjustment is needed, they have a factory tool, which is like a giant prybar to bend the struts
BMW's also, you can only do toe, and if a camber adjustment is needed, they have a factory tool, which is like a giant prybar to bend the struts
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks man. I'll look again tonight but I don't think I have anything like that on mine... I assume that arrow is pointing towards the outside of the engine bay and slightly back towards the windshield?
One of my problem is that I replaced all the bushings with ES polys so nothing is really going back the way it was since the old rubber bushings were in horrible shape.
One of my problem is that I replaced all the bushings with ES polys so nothing is really going back the way it was since the old rubber bushings were in horrible shape.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another quick question: The "tension rods" that go from the front bumper area to each of the A-arms.. They have two large rubber bushings on each side of the bracket.. How are they supposed to be adjusted? I installed the poly bushings and wondering if you just squish the bushing a bit and go on?
Thanks again
Thanks again
#16
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
you should look in the FSM, there's a measurement. page 13:8
http://foxed.ca/rx7manual/manuals/19...Suspension.pdf
failing that, you would adjust so that the control arm is centered in the subframe.
http://foxed.ca/rx7manual/manuals/19...Suspension.pdf
failing that, you would adjust so that the control arm is centered in the subframe.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So I played with them yesterday and moved the strut mount around and the front tire is still off. If I put a straight edge on it, the bottom is about 1 inch away from the straight edge. You guys think may be I just need to run the car and allow the suspension to settle? Both sides of the car show about the same camber. If I put lowering springs on it, would this change the camber enough? I do want to lower it some as it sits a bit high now...
Thanks
Thanks
#18
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
the stock camber spec is +1 degree of camber...
#19
1st-Class Engine Janitor
iTrader: (15)
It also would seem to depend on the bushings having a specific compressibility, which probably changes when you switch from OEM rubber to urethane.
#21
1st-Class Engine Janitor
iTrader: (15)
Are you letting the front suspension adequately settle/cycle after lowering back to the ground & before measuring? Takes a bit of rolling and bouncing to get things at operational height after jacking.
1* of camber amounts to around 0.4" across the 23" diameter of a 205/50-15 tire - exact measurement depends on tire outer diameter. Negative camber of course is "top in."
1* of camber amounts to around 0.4" across the 23" diameter of a 205/50-15 tire - exact measurement depends on tire outer diameter. Negative camber of course is "top in."
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you letting the front suspension adequately settle/cycle after lowering back to the ground & before measuring? Takes a bit of rolling and bouncing to get things at operational height after jacking.
1* of camber amounts to around 0.4" across the 23" diameter of a 205/50-15 tire - exact measurement depends on tire outer diameter. Negative camber of course is "top in."
1* of camber amounts to around 0.4" across the 23" diameter of a 205/50-15 tire - exact measurement depends on tire outer diameter. Negative camber of course is "top in."
Thanks
#23
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
try rolling it a few feet either way
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
08-11-15 03:47 PM