1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Upgrading stock carb vs Aftermarket

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-10, 10:55 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
85RotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 203
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Upgrading stock carb vs Aftermarket

OK guys i keep having a debate with my brother. He says that by porting out the stock carb, allowing for larger primaries and what not, it will do the same job as lets say a dual webber, or any other reputable aftermarket carbs. Now since i have never dealt with carbs in my life, i can’t really say why he is wrong, other than knowing he must be, because evry first gen i see with Serious mods, all ditch the stock carb, and have an upgraded one put on.

Basically, why is a aftermarket webber or any other brand better than a stock carb ported / larger primaries, and what not. What are the limits to the stock carb, even if you modded it to the fullest extent, and why can it never be better than a good aftermarket carb?

HE has a 260HP first gen, 13B, no turbos, and i keep telling him, ditch the stock carb (modded mind you)and put in a nice aftermarket one, as im sure it will help him with HP, or at least attribute to a more responsive motor.

thanks.
85RotaryRocket is offline  
Old 02-15-10, 11:41 PM
  #2  
I need a new user title

 
PercentSevenC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Yaizu, Japan
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't heard of anyone getting more flow out of the stock Nikki than Sterling while maintaining good drivability. Sterling's carbs are rated at 465 CFM at 1.5" Hg. A Weber 48 IDA is over 600 depending on how it's configured, and there are plenty of even bigger carbs around, especially of the square-bore 4bbl variety. In terms of airflow capability, a Nikki will never be able to compete with these.

Do you need more than what a Sterling carb can provide? Depends. If you're running a stockport 12A, maybe not. A bridgeport 13B, on the other hand, wants more than even a 48 IDA according to Racing Beat's dyno testing.

There's also the problem of the stock intake manifold, which is apparently quite restrictive (but I haven't seen any actual flow numbers on it).
PercentSevenC is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 05:43 AM
  #3  
RX for fun

iTrader: (13)
 
Siraniko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Socal
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by 85RotaryRocket
O

HE has a 260HP first gen, 13B, no turbos, and i keep telling him, ditch the stock carb (modded mind you)and put in a nice aftermarket one, as im sure it will help him with HP, or at least attribute to a more responsive motor.

I need to see this
Siraniko is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:43 AM
  #4  
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
rxtasy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 9,315
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 237 Posts
there's no way he's getting that kinda power from a normally aspirated 13b, especially with the stock carb.
rxtasy3 is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 09:22 AM
  #5  
Waffles - hmmm good

iTrader: (1)
 
t_g_farrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Wylie, N.C.
Posts: 8,783
Received 282 Likes on 232 Posts
I call BS on the HP numbers also. Maybe 160 more likely.
t_g_farrell is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 02:20 PM
  #6  
searching...

iTrader: (8)
 
Jibaro 12A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That just made my day! 260HP on a N/A 13B? Whats he smoking?
Jibaro 12A is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:06 PM
  #7  
o.O

iTrader: (3)
 
Crispin38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 64865
Posts: 871
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have no experience with the stock carb, except before i switched to my weber. ( i have a IDF, not IDA not much difference)
I didnt like it of course, until after it was rebuilt. The driveablity was great. Loved it.
But then i dropped a Big Street port in my car and my weber, etc.
Of course the 'steetability' of my car has gone way down. I have to set my idle once the weather changes slighty. Sometimes change jets, of course you really mess with jetting once you first get the carb or swap motors.. (those are the down sides.)
Up sides are great power up high, the airflow capabilities of the weber are second to none.. Which i love this. But i hate all the tuning i need to do sometimes, and the poor driveablity.

That's my two cents.
Crispin38 is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:58 PM
  #8  
I need a new user title

 
PercentSevenC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Yaizu, Japan
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Weber DCOE drives as well as a stock carb except for the lack of a choke and the bog if you try to floor it from idle (you'll have the same problem with a 4bbl with mechanical secondaries). It just has more power and it's easier to tune.

Maybe he means 260 HP at the flywheel? That's around 220 to the wheels, which is quite believable if he's got a big port and a good exhaust and intake setup. With a stock carb, though? Not so much.
PercentSevenC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
03-17-22 02:46 PM
Clacor
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
08-14-15 09:17 AM



Quick Reply: Upgrading stock carb vs Aftermarket



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.