1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Side Draft Question...What Is This?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #1  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Side Draft Question...What Is This?

Ok, I have seen these on all the side drafts (down drafts too)...Usually in different lengths. Some long, som short, some in between. Are these the "velocity stacks" Ive heard of? Why are they different sizes? Most Racing Beat Dellortos that Ive seen have fairly short ones, yet this is a reacing beat intake manifold, but it has long ones...Is this not a "true" Racing Beat carb? Or can you tune these like you would the jets? Someone wanna help me out? Thanks guys .

~T.J.


Last edited by RotorMotorDriver; Jan 11, 2003 at 05:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 05:03 PM
  #2  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Yes they are velocity stacks.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 05:59 PM
  #3  
metalliman's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Bay City, MI
Yup again, they are velocity stacks. Generally speaking, longer one produce more low end torque, shorter ones produce more high end horsepower, much the same with intake manifolds. And they're usually parbolically shaped, to create the least amount of turbulence for incoming air.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 06:16 PM
  #4  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
So...The Racing Beat carbs came with little short ones, which should result in high end power according to that logic. Racing beat claims 53.6% increase in power on a stock port 12A with their Dellorto intake and single pipe exhaust (header, pre-silencer, muffler). This means roughly 150 HP. Now, hes using the longer ones, and he was dynoed at 147 HP. Shouldnt there be a bigger difference in HP than that? I mean, if its only a 3 HP loss yet hes got better low end, Im all about that. Someone wanna help me understand more?

~T.J.

Last edited by RotorMotorDriver; Jan 11, 2003 at 06:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #5  
85RX7GS's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 1
From: NJ
What's with all these tiny velocity stacks?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 07:04 PM
  #6  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Thats what Im trying to figure out...

~T.J.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #7  
85RX7GS's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 1
From: NJ
I've seen a pair on a BBC and each is about as big as a melon.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 07:25 PM
  #8  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Haha, cool. Thats some serious air flow .

You know, now that I think aobut it, 3 HP is a lot of difference for just changing such a little thing ya know? Maybe thats about right...150 with the shorter ones, 147 with the longer ones...I dont know...Someone help? Please?

~T.J.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 07:52 PM
  #9  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Remember though, its not peak hp numbers that count. It hp through the range that you operate the engine. An engine that makes ungodly top end hp is no good if you need power in the middle range rpms.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #10  
851stgen12a's Avatar
Off riding sportbikes!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Wa
Yea I think where the power is, is ultimately more important than peak horsepower. I would like more Mid range power for the street but when I am at the auto-x or on a road course I would definetly prefer killer top end....
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 11:27 PM
  #11  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Originally posted by Rx7carl
Remember though, its not peak hp numbers that count. It hp through the range that you operate the engine. An engine that makes ungodly top end hp is no good if you need power in the middle range rpms.
I couldnt agree more Carl. I wouldnt care if someone had a 300 HP car that had a huge turbo that took all day to spool. By the time they hit 60, I would be gone.

I was just trying to get to the bottom of these velocity stacks .

~T.J.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Aug 18, 2015 03:09 PM
tsmith94FD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Aug 16, 2015 05:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.