Is the rotary engine doomed to be just a memory?
Thread Starter
Apprentice Guru
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: Cloud Nine and Peak of God
Is the rotary engine doomed to be just a memory?
At its peak in 1972 Mazda sold 1.6 million rotary engined cars.
Since then there been a steady decline, other than a temporary plateau when the SA/FB was sold. The RX-8 has been a marketing and financial disaster, more a fiasco then a flagship.
There is a strong possibility the RX-8 will be dropped in the next two years as sales are further declining. In all honesty, the rotary engine is not a selling point. While it is light and compact, the rotary is inefficient in terms of fuel consumption which is becoming an ever important consideration. The small capacity of the 13B of 1.3 litres is a Mazda myth, in Japan its rated as 2 litre, in Europe 2.6 litres while some engineers say 3.9 litres. As conventional engines have improved, there is little need to use the more expensive rotary to generate the same power.
We would all like to see the gen 1 brought back as a light weight cheap 'sports car'. The problem is gen 1s can be bought for $500, and even a mint low mileage one can be bought for $6,000. How many on the forum would go out and spend $20,000 plus on a new hot hatch just because it has a rotary? There are some 45,000 gen 1s still in existence, not much of a market when Mazda would need to sell far more than that a year to justify introducing a new FB.
So is the rotary engine doomed, and will the SA/FB be the last of the lightweight rotary powered affordable sports cars?
Since then there been a steady decline, other than a temporary plateau when the SA/FB was sold. The RX-8 has been a marketing and financial disaster, more a fiasco then a flagship.
There is a strong possibility the RX-8 will be dropped in the next two years as sales are further declining. In all honesty, the rotary engine is not a selling point. While it is light and compact, the rotary is inefficient in terms of fuel consumption which is becoming an ever important consideration. The small capacity of the 13B of 1.3 litres is a Mazda myth, in Japan its rated as 2 litre, in Europe 2.6 litres while some engineers say 3.9 litres. As conventional engines have improved, there is little need to use the more expensive rotary to generate the same power.
We would all like to see the gen 1 brought back as a light weight cheap 'sports car'. The problem is gen 1s can be bought for $500, and even a mint low mileage one can be bought for $6,000. How many on the forum would go out and spend $20,000 plus on a new hot hatch just because it has a rotary? There are some 45,000 gen 1s still in existence, not much of a market when Mazda would need to sell far more than that a year to justify introducing a new FB.
So is the rotary engine doomed, and will the SA/FB be the last of the lightweight rotary powered affordable sports cars?
ive been wondering the same thing. It would be great if mazda could bring back something that was rotary and not ugly. I think that if the car was cheap and well powered people would not have a problem dropping some money on it.
With me, it may not happen since I have enough parts to build say five to seven 4-port 13-B motors.
Originally Posted by PaulFitzwarryne
At its peak in 1972 Mazda sold 1.6 million rotary engined cars.
Since then there been a steady decline, other than a temporary plateau when the SA/FB was sold. The RX-8 has been a marketing and financial disaster, more a fiasco then a flagship.
There is a strong possibility the RX-8 will be dropped in the next two years as sales are further declining. In all honesty, the rotary engine is not a selling point. While it is light and compact, the rotary is inefficient in terms of fuel consumption which is becoming an ever important consideration. The small capacity of the 13B of 1.3 litres is a Mazda myth, in Japan its rated as 2 litre, in Europe 2.6 litres while some engineers say 3.9 litres. As conventional engines have improved, there is little need to use the more expensive rotary to generate the same power.
We would all like to see the gen 1 brought back as a light weight cheap 'sports car'. The problem is gen 1s can be bought for $500, and even a mint low mileage one can be bought for $6,000. How many on the forum would go out and spend $20,000 plus on a new hot hatch just because it has a rotary? There are some 45,000 gen 1s still in existence, not much of a market when Mazda would need to sell far more than that a year to justify introducing a new FB.
So is the rotary engine doomed, and will the SA/FB be the last of the lightweight rotary powered affordable sports cars?
Since then there been a steady decline, other than a temporary plateau when the SA/FB was sold. The RX-8 has been a marketing and financial disaster, more a fiasco then a flagship.
There is a strong possibility the RX-8 will be dropped in the next two years as sales are further declining. In all honesty, the rotary engine is not a selling point. While it is light and compact, the rotary is inefficient in terms of fuel consumption which is becoming an ever important consideration. The small capacity of the 13B of 1.3 litres is a Mazda myth, in Japan its rated as 2 litre, in Europe 2.6 litres while some engineers say 3.9 litres. As conventional engines have improved, there is little need to use the more expensive rotary to generate the same power.
We would all like to see the gen 1 brought back as a light weight cheap 'sports car'. The problem is gen 1s can be bought for $500, and even a mint low mileage one can be bought for $6,000. How many on the forum would go out and spend $20,000 plus on a new hot hatch just because it has a rotary? There are some 45,000 gen 1s still in existence, not much of a market when Mazda would need to sell far more than that a year to justify introducing a new FB.
So is the rotary engine doomed, and will the SA/FB be the last of the lightweight rotary powered affordable sports cars?
Any gas engine can be converted to run on hydrogen, the problem is readily available fuel stations.
Originally Posted by Juiceh
Well, since mazda has created a 13b powered rx8 that runs of some other fuel(i think it was hydrogen) I think it might have more of a future than you may think.
you ask a valid question. the answer is: who knows?
on one hand, it's survived this long and the foundation of those that are true enthusiasts is pretty strong. on the other hand, people in this country are fickle. obviously i can't speak for the rest of the world, but i believe all it would take is a few whispers in a Wall Street boardroom or maybe a retarded movie or music video that makes an Rx-7 or Rx-8 it's centerpoint and it would spark a bovine "follow-the-others" response that could actually breathe life back into it.
i know. i know. not likely to happen, but possible. i'm old enough to remember when Rx-3s and Rx-7s ruled the local races back home and if there was an Internet and an Rx7Club back then and someone said "man, Honda Civics are going to rule!" who would have given credence to that notion?
as for this ... if Mazda built a car that could be contemporary, but still capture the spirit of the original Rx-7s, then i'd spend $20K, $30K and more to have it. i love them that much. again, not likely to happen in an age where cold leather seats in the winter are enough to dissuade someone from buying a car - so i've resigned myself to building my own.
on one hand, it's survived this long and the foundation of those that are true enthusiasts is pretty strong. on the other hand, people in this country are fickle. obviously i can't speak for the rest of the world, but i believe all it would take is a few whispers in a Wall Street boardroom or maybe a retarded movie or music video that makes an Rx-7 or Rx-8 it's centerpoint and it would spark a bovine "follow-the-others" response that could actually breathe life back into it.
i know. i know. not likely to happen, but possible. i'm old enough to remember when Rx-3s and Rx-7s ruled the local races back home and if there was an Internet and an Rx7Club back then and someone said "man, Honda Civics are going to rule!" who would have given credence to that notion?
Originally Posted by PaulFitzwarryne
How many on the forum would go out and spend $20,000 plus on a new hot hatch just because it has a rotary?
Trending Topics
Where did you get the idea that the RX-8 was a "distaster"? It got excellent reviews from almost every publication, car of the year/engine of the year/etc, and sold quite well. I could see someone saying the 3rd gen RX-7 was a "fiasco", but the RX-8? Hardly.
Don't forget the popular and growing Formula Mazda series, all powered by Renesis motors. Mazda is doing great on the track and the sales floor right now, so cheer up.
Don't forget the popular and growing Formula Mazda series, all powered by Renesis motors. Mazda is doing great on the track and the sales floor right now, so cheer up.
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2
From: Allentown, PA - Paterson, NJ
Originally Posted by RE Matsuda
Where did you get the idea that the RX-8 was a "distaster"? It got excellent reviews from almost every publication, car of the year/engine of the year/etc, and sold quite well. I could see someone saying the 3rd gen RX-7 was a "fiasco", but the RX-8? Hardly.
Don't forget the popular and growing Formula Mazda series, all powered by Renesis motors. Mazda is doing great on the track and the sales floor right now, so cheer up.
Don't forget the popular and growing Formula Mazda series, all powered by Renesis motors. Mazda is doing great on the track and the sales floor right now, so cheer up.
Well, not to get a big stink started over the RX8, but didn't the plant building the 8s burn down? This was the info I was given not too long ago. I piont blank asked a local Mazda dealer, and they said it was true. Any confirmations on that people? As far as the decline of the rotory, I think most people don't understand it, so they don't give it a chance. Anyone checked out the Quasiturbine engine? Very intruiging.
Thread Starter
Apprentice Guru
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: Cloud Nine and Peak of God
Originally Posted by RE Matsuda
Where did you get the idea that the RX-8 was a "distaster"? It got excellent reviews from almost every publication, car of the year/engine of the year/etc, and sold quite well. I could see someone saying the 3rd gen RX-7 was a "fiasco", but the RX-8? Hardly.
Don't forget the popular and growing Formula Mazda series, all powered by Renesis motors. Mazda is doing great on the track and the sales floor right now, so cheer up.
Don't forget the popular and growing Formula Mazda series, all powered by Renesis motors. Mazda is doing great on the track and the sales floor right now, so cheer up.
The cost of tooling up for a new model is staggering, and is a major component of unit cost. If your sales prediction is significantly out, even with built in contingencies, losses mount geometrically. The reason Mazda were so successful with the Miata was the platform was based on the 323, and the sales figures later justified major development. It was a case of the egg coming before the chicken!
While the Formula Mazda series is successful, the number of cars involved is only a fraction of a day's production. So directly it has minimal impact on sales. At present it has apparently not indirectly impacted on sales, possibly because the average person buying a RX-8 is not interested in the sport.
Last edited by PaulFitzwarryne; Mar 14, 2006 at 06:17 PM.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
Subject to disclaimers.
were all gonna be buying RX-8's in the future.
just think. when I hit 40
im 16 now
I Can restore a RX-8 wahoooo
Subject to disclaimers.
were all gonna be buying RX-8's in the future.
just think. when I hit 40
im 16 now
I Can restore a RX-8 wahoooo
engine thermo coatings
The coating of engine parts has come a long way in recent years.
It seems to me that the Wnkel could benefit from some of these coatings even more than piston engines do.
Ceramic coated rotors with moly impregnated sides could improve thermal efficiency improving fuel mileage and reducing heat load on the oiling system. Maybe chrome housings and moly edges on the apex seals could help as well.
Has anyone tried coatings in a rotary?
Dennis L. Cote
It seems to me that the Wnkel could benefit from some of these coatings even more than piston engines do.
Ceramic coated rotors with moly impregnated sides could improve thermal efficiency improving fuel mileage and reducing heat load on the oiling system. Maybe chrome housings and moly edges on the apex seals could help as well.
Has anyone tried coatings in a rotary?
Dennis L. Cote
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 136
From: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
http://www.jhbperformance.com/products/ that What you are talkin about?..and by the way..GOOD Cars Never DIE!!...look at how many People Like us keep Resurrecting Them!
Originally Posted by PaulFitzwarryne
The reason Mazda were so successful with the Miata was the platform was based on the 323, and the sales figures later justified major development. It was a case of the egg coming before the chicken!
No. The BF/BG Chassis (323, Protege, MX3, Escort) and the Miata's NB chassis are complete polar opposites. The only thing shared between the 323 and the Miata are the rear drive system found in the AWD 323s... and the hardware used throughout the car. Nothing else is the same.
Thread Starter
Apprentice Guru
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: Cloud Nine and Peak of God
Originally Posted by B6T
The BF/BG Chassis (323, Protege, MX3, Escort) and the Miata's NB chassis are complete polar opposites. The only thing shared between the 323 and the Miata are the rear drive system found in the AWD 323s... and the hardware used throughout the car.
Originally Posted by B6T
No. The BF/BG Chassis (323, Protege, MX3, Escort) and the Miata's NB chassis are complete polar opposites. The only thing shared between the 323 and the Miata are the rear drive system found in the AWD 323s... and the hardware used throughout the car. Nothing else is the same.
hi, and thanks..
oh and the seven will never die!!
vw beetle is a good example
Originally Posted by PaulFitzwarryne
Out of interest where did the soft top Ford Capri fit in?
paul check your pm's.....
as far as capri fitting in....... what about festiva? same motor, not turbo like the capri gt models tho.. thats the capri gt your speaking of, right
The Festiva engine was only from the same family of engines as the Capri.
As far as how the Capri fits in, I believe it shared the same drivetrain and running gear as the FWD BF chassis cars (1986-89), but the chassis was significantly different because it was a convertible. I'm not too sure though because they never sold them in Canada, where I live.
As far as how the Capri fits in, I believe it shared the same drivetrain and running gear as the FWD BF chassis cars (1986-89), but the chassis was significantly different because it was a convertible. I'm not too sure though because they never sold them in Canada, where I live.
Thread Starter
Apprentice Guru
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: Cloud Nine and Peak of God
Originally Posted by B6T
The only thing shared between the 323 and the Miata are the rear drive system found in the AWD 323s... and the hardware used throughout the car. Nothing else is the same.





