Pics of the engine.
#28
Super Newbie
Originally posted by Directfreak
We sure will...
<-directfreak waving at the nice man in the V8
while blowing by him at the track.
We sure will...
<-directfreak waving at the nice man in the V8
while blowing by him at the track.
#30
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Acton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Hey I say it's your car, and if the V8 makes you happy, then more power to ya,
Personally, I'd never even begin to consider even thinking about the slightest possibilty of ever putting a boinger in my car, but that's me.
Well, I guess I'll get to see it first hand at the BIG meet in June?
Good luck to ya.
Personally, I'd never even begin to consider even thinking about the slightest possibilty of ever putting a boinger in my car, but that's me.
Well, I guess I'll get to see it first hand at the BIG meet in June?
Good luck to ya.
#31
I can has a Hemi? Yes...
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by Felix Wankel
Then when you detonate and pop the motor, he can wave right back.
Then when you detonate and pop the motor, he can wave right back.
I didn't expect this from you Felix.
Are you partial to v8's in rotaries now, or do you really think I will denonate and blow up?
I am curious, because my system will be very similar to AJC13B's, In other words Big time power with reliability.
Also as far as that "Stealth" factor WinnipegGSL states, I think a V8 rumble will take care of that.
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Winnipeg,Manitoba
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm using a t-5 tranny.
And the ebay issue. Rotor, you arent the only one that expressed inerest in the engine so I made the decision to put it on ebay.
Its not like I hate rotaries, I just want power and I like the look of the RX-7, trying to get 300HP and lots of torque from a rotary is too expensive for a 16 year old.
And the ebay issue. Rotor, you arent the only one that expressed inerest in the engine so I made the decision to put it on ebay.
Its not like I hate rotaries, I just want power and I like the look of the RX-7, trying to get 300HP and lots of torque from a rotary is too expensive for a 16 year old.
#33
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd bet on a 300hp rotor against the weight of the 8. Aluminium intake etc. would make it a bit lighter but it is still a heavy cast-iron block that would screw the 7's weight distribution standard being pretty close to 50/50....
#34
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BLASPHEMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why oh why?!?!? pistons aren't your friend.....
I'm glad you're at least working ona 7, BUT, a Triumph or MG with a rotory would be more welcome than a piston powered rx
sad sad sad......my friend has a 99 ws6 t/a and tries to tell me to drop a v8 in my 1st gen
" it's cheaper, faster,LS1's get good mileage;etc" but it just wouldn't be a 7; You get one BECAUSE of the rotary,not to get rid of it.
Why not go butcher a Z or 924 or something...
Just leave the wankle alone
why?!?!?!?!?
I'm glad you're at least working ona 7, BUT, a Triumph or MG with a rotory would be more welcome than a piston powered rx
sad sad sad......my friend has a 99 ws6 t/a and tries to tell me to drop a v8 in my 1st gen
" it's cheaper, faster,LS1's get good mileage;etc" but it just wouldn't be a 7; You get one BECAUSE of the rotary,not to get rid of it.
Why not go butcher a Z or 924 or something...
Just leave the wankle alone
why?!?!?!?!?
#35
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
btw....i'm in the process of a tii transplant for my 83;
180 stock
adding 3 1/2" dp and 3" exhaust,no cats, and a fmic
should be enough to keep most v8's @bay;
as far as cost;
$200 for 83 with bad clutch
$100 for 87 TII with bad clutch and lots of body damage
$300 for exhaust from local shop
$65 for really big volvo fmic
180 stock
adding 3 1/2" dp and 3" exhaust,no cats, and a fmic
should be enough to keep most v8's @bay;
as far as cost;
$200 for 83 with bad clutch
$100 for 87 TII with bad clutch and lots of body damage
$300 for exhaust from local shop
$65 for really big volvo fmic
#36
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes
on
36 Posts
Originally posted by Winnipeg85GSL
Ahem . . . no.
Aluminum intake 28 lbs lighter , removal of some engine bay items, 10 lbs, relocation of battery. In the end maybe 50 lbs lighter in the front. I realize that it is positioned differently but it isnt going to be as much of a boat as everyone thinks, ask Kerry. The reason I did this was mainly speed. This car is gonna go like no body's business. For me to get a fast rotary would cost me alot more. I'm doing it right and I think half the fun will be the sleeper aspect of it. No regrets.
Ahem . . . no.
Aluminum intake 28 lbs lighter , removal of some engine bay items, 10 lbs, relocation of battery. In the end maybe 50 lbs lighter in the front. I realize that it is positioned differently but it isnt going to be as much of a boat as everyone thinks, ask Kerry. The reason I did this was mainly speed. This car is gonna go like no body's business. For me to get a fast rotary would cost me alot more. I'm doing it right and I think half the fun will be the sleeper aspect of it. No regrets.
50 lbs. lighter in the front means you're still 170 lbs. too heavy up front. It would be just like having a buddy ride on your hood strapped down like a deer. Think you're gonna be quickest on the track or even the street when it comes to the twisties? NOT!! Keep it on a drag race track where a hybrid like this belongs and start posting anything else on this abomination in a Ford Forum where they'll appreciate what you're doing. It should be obvious it isn't here....
#37
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Da Barrio!!!(Irving, Texas)
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by mar3
50 lbs. lighter in the front means you're still 170 lbs. too heavy up front. It would be just like having a buddy ride on your hood strapped down like a deer. Think you're gonna be quickest on the track or even the street when it comes to the twisties? NOT!! Keep it on a drag race track where a hybrid like this belongs and start posting anything else on this abomination in a Ford Forum where they'll appreciate what you're doing. It should be obvious it isn't here....
50 lbs. lighter in the front means you're still 170 lbs. too heavy up front. It would be just like having a buddy ride on your hood strapped down like a deer. Think you're gonna be quickest on the track or even the street when it comes to the twisties? NOT!! Keep it on a drag race track where a hybrid like this belongs and start posting anything else on this abomination in a Ford Forum where they'll appreciate what you're doing. It should be obvious it isn't here....
I wanna see your bird put shame on him..... I wanna catch it on tape tooo...............
#38
Driven a turbo FB lately?
iTrader: (1)
Originally posted by Winnipeg85GSL
Ahem . . . no.
Aluminum intake 28 lbs lighter , removal of some engine bay items, 10 lbs, relocation of battery. In the end maybe 50 lbs lighter in the front. I realize that it is positioned differently but it isnt going to be as much of a boat as everyone thinks, ask Kerry. The reason I did this was mainly speed. This car is gonna go like no body's business. For me to get a fast rotary would cost me alot more. I'm doing it right and I think half the fun will be the sleeper aspect of it. No regrets.
Ahem . . . no.
Aluminum intake 28 lbs lighter , removal of some engine bay items, 10 lbs, relocation of battery. In the end maybe 50 lbs lighter in the front. I realize that it is positioned differently but it isnt going to be as much of a boat as everyone thinks, ask Kerry. The reason I did this was mainly speed. This car is gonna go like no body's business. For me to get a fast rotary would cost me alot more. I'm doing it right and I think half the fun will be the sleeper aspect of it. No regrets.
The car in the end was only about 62 pounds heavier than the orginal car.
#41
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to make it even worse check the link:
www.thewrongmotor.com
tsk tsk, when good 7's go bad
If there are any children present they may want to turn away
www.thewrongmotor.com
tsk tsk, when good 7's go bad
If there are any children present they may want to turn away
#43
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes
on
36 Posts
Originally posted by MIKE-P-28
Ok first im gonna say that will never NOT be a rotary in anything I drive. I like them But with a AL intake and AL heads. Hes right it isnt much heavier... I got a picture of a chevy in a 88 vert and it was weighed by Derek Biven's Chassis Designs (he builds race car frames and has a digital scale)
The car in the end was only about 62 pounds heavier than the orginal car.
Ok first im gonna say that will never NOT be a rotary in anything I drive. I like them But with a AL intake and AL heads. Hes right it isnt much heavier... I got a picture of a chevy in a 88 vert and it was weighed by Derek Biven's Chassis Designs (he builds race car frames and has a digital scale)
The car in the end was only about 62 pounds heavier than the orginal car.
#45
Old [Sch|F]ool
Aww jeez...
Okay. The 302 is about the same weight as the 12A. Want proof? The front ride height will be the same after the swap. The front springs are only 100lb/in or so, so every additional 100lb would make the front end 1/2 inch lower. Too bad I didn't know about this sooner or I'd have asked ya to measure the ride height before and after
The weight distribution will still be a hell of a lot better than a GSL-SE (55/45) and TONS better than anything that engine could be found in stock. And, nothing else that engine could otherwise be found in has the looks and handling of an RX-7...
Believe it or not, putting a 302 in a 1st-gen isn't that difficult, so I'm told. Swap the crossmember around 180 degrees, make motor mount adapters, and you're 75% there. The EFI manifold will fit under the hood, the stock headers will clear everything... it actually fits the RX-7 better than it does in any Ford.
There is a lot of disinformation out there based on assumptions... assuming the rotary is light (it's not), assuming the V8 is heavy (it's not, especially a SBF), assuming the V8 is larger externally (it's not, when you factor in the manifolds and stuff).
Okay. The 302 is about the same weight as the 12A. Want proof? The front ride height will be the same after the swap. The front springs are only 100lb/in or so, so every additional 100lb would make the front end 1/2 inch lower. Too bad I didn't know about this sooner or I'd have asked ya to measure the ride height before and after
The weight distribution will still be a hell of a lot better than a GSL-SE (55/45) and TONS better than anything that engine could be found in stock. And, nothing else that engine could otherwise be found in has the looks and handling of an RX-7...
Believe it or not, putting a 302 in a 1st-gen isn't that difficult, so I'm told. Swap the crossmember around 180 degrees, make motor mount adapters, and you're 75% there. The EFI manifold will fit under the hood, the stock headers will clear everything... it actually fits the RX-7 better than it does in any Ford.
There is a lot of disinformation out there based on assumptions... assuming the rotary is light (it's not), assuming the V8 is heavy (it's not, especially a SBF), assuming the V8 is larger externally (it's not, when you factor in the manifolds and stuff).
#46
Old [Sch|F]ool
Originally posted by mar3
Apples and oranges, Mike. The 13B is way heavier than a 12A. I believe the Ford is heavier than a mouse. You're still talking at least 100 lbs. up front even after full aluminum optimization of the 302 unless he goes aluminum block.
Apples and oranges, Mike. The 13B is way heavier than a 12A. I believe the Ford is heavier than a mouse. You're still talking at least 100 lbs. up front even after full aluminum optimization of the 302 unless he goes aluminum block.
You may not believe it, but that 302 probably weighs the same as the 12A that came out!
#47
Super Newbie
I'm putting my FB in storage, and when it comes out it will have a GN 3.8L in it. I drove it the other day and realized what a colossal waste of money my carb and exhaust were.
#48
Super Newbie
Originally posted by Directfreak
Et Tu, Caesar?
I didn't expect this from you Felix.
Are you partial to v8's in rotaries now, or do you really think I will denonate and blow up?
I am curious, because my system will be very similar to AJC13B's, In other words Big time power with reliability.
Also as far as that "Stealth" factor WinnipegGSL states, I think a V8 rumble will take care of that.
Et Tu, Caesar?
I didn't expect this from you Felix.
Are you partial to v8's in rotaries now, or do you really think I will denonate and blow up?
I am curious, because my system will be very similar to AJC13B's, In other words Big time power with reliability.
Also as far as that "Stealth" factor WinnipegGSL states, I think a V8 rumble will take care of that.
I'm a car person, not a rotary or V8 person.