1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Pics of the engine.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-02, 01:20 AM
  #27  
Hunting Skylines

 
REVHED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't care what it weighs. It's still a boat anchor.
Old 04-25-02, 01:26 AM
  #28  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Directfreak


We sure will...

<-directfreak waving at the nice man in the V8
while blowing by him at the track.
Then when you detonate and pop the motor, he can wave right back.
Old 04-25-02, 01:37 AM
  #29  
Senior Member

 
NanaimoRx-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
Posts: 723
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a sad day in Canada.... whatever, it's just another project and to each his own. You going to the big Canadian meet with that?
Old 04-25-02, 04:38 AM
  #30  
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad

 
smnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Acton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Hey I say it's your car, and if the V8 makes you happy, then more power to ya,

Personally, I'd never even begin to consider even thinking about the slightest possibilty of ever putting a boinger in my car, but that's me.

Well, I guess I'll get to see it first hand at the BIG meet in June?

Good luck to ya.
Old 04-25-02, 08:04 AM
  #31  
I can has a Hemi? Yes...

iTrader: (2)
 
Directfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 3OH5
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Felix Wankel


Then when you detonate and pop the motor, he can wave right back.
Et Tu, Caesar?

I didn't expect this from you Felix.

Are you partial to v8's in rotaries now, or do you really think I will denonate and blow up?

I am curious, because my system will be very similar to AJC13B's, In other words Big time power with reliability.

Also as far as that "Stealth" factor WinnipegGSL states, I think a V8 rumble will take care of that.
Old 04-25-02, 08:36 AM
  #32  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Winnipeg85GSL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Winnipeg,Manitoba
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm using a t-5 tranny.

And the ebay issue. Rotor, you arent the only one that expressed inerest in the engine so I made the decision to put it on ebay.

Its not like I hate rotaries, I just want power and I like the look of the RX-7, trying to get 300HP and lots of torque from a rotary is too expensive for a 16 year old.
Old 04-25-02, 08:39 AM
  #33  
Junior Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd bet on a 300hp rotor against the weight of the 8. Aluminium intake etc. would make it a bit lighter but it is still a heavy cast-iron block that would screw the 7's weight distribution standard being pretty close to 50/50....
Old 04-25-02, 08:40 AM
  #34  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
87turbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BLASPHEMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why oh why?!?!? pistons aren't your friend.....
I'm glad you're at least working ona 7, BUT, a Triumph or MG with a rotory would be more welcome than a piston powered rx
sad sad sad......my friend has a 99 ws6 t/a and tries to tell me to drop a v8 in my 1st gen
" it's cheaper, faster,LS1's get good mileage;etc" but it just wouldn't be a 7; You get one BECAUSE of the rotary,not to get rid of it.
Why not go butcher a Z or 924 or something...
Just leave the wankle alone
why?!?!?!?!?
Old 04-25-02, 08:45 AM
  #35  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
87turbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
btw....i'm in the process of a tii transplant for my 83;
180 stock
adding 3 1/2" dp and 3" exhaust,no cats, and a fmic
should be enough to keep most v8's @bay;
as far as cost;
$200 for 83 with bad clutch
$100 for 87 TII with bad clutch and lots of body damage
$300 for exhaust from local shop
$65 for really big volvo fmic
Old 04-25-02, 08:53 AM
  #36  
Administrator

iTrader: (8)
 
mar3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally posted by Winnipeg85GSL


Ahem . . . no.
Aluminum intake 28 lbs lighter , removal of some engine bay items, 10 lbs, relocation of battery. In the end maybe 50 lbs lighter in the front. I realize that it is positioned differently but it isnt going to be as much of a boat as everyone thinks, ask Kerry. The reason I did this was mainly speed. This car is gonna go like no body's business. For me to get a fast rotary would cost me alot more. I'm doing it right and I think half the fun will be the sleeper aspect of it. No regrets.

50 lbs. lighter in the front means you're still 170 lbs. too heavy up front. It would be just like having a buddy ride on your hood strapped down like a deer. Think you're gonna be quickest on the track or even the street when it comes to the twisties? NOT!! Keep it on a drag race track where a hybrid like this belongs and start posting anything else on this abomination in a Ford Forum where they'll appreciate what you're doing. It should be obvious it isn't here....
Old 04-25-02, 09:19 AM
  #37  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
79+80_rx-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Da Barrio!!!(Irving, Texas)
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by mar3



50 lbs. lighter in the front means you're still 170 lbs. too heavy up front. It would be just like having a buddy ride on your hood strapped down like a deer. Think you're gonna be quickest on the track or even the street when it comes to the twisties? NOT!! Keep it on a drag race track where a hybrid like this belongs and start posting anything else on this abomination in a Ford Forum where they'll appreciate what you're doing. It should be obvious it isn't here....

I wanna see your bird put shame on him..... I wanna catch it on tape tooo...............
Old 04-25-02, 09:25 AM
  #38  
Driven a turbo FB lately?

iTrader: (1)
 
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Winnipeg85GSL


Ahem . . . no.
Aluminum intake 28 lbs lighter , removal of some engine bay items, 10 lbs, relocation of battery. In the end maybe 50 lbs lighter in the front. I realize that it is positioned differently but it isnt going to be as much of a boat as everyone thinks, ask Kerry. The reason I did this was mainly speed. This car is gonna go like no body's business. For me to get a fast rotary would cost me alot more. I'm doing it right and I think half the fun will be the sleeper aspect of it. No regrets.
Ok first im gonna say that will never NOT be a rotary in anything I drive. I like them But with a AL intake and AL heads. Hes right it isnt much heavier... I got a picture of a chevy in a 88 vert and it was weighed by Derek Biven's Chassis Designs (he builds race car frames and has a digital scale)

The car in the end was only about 62 pounds heavier than the orginal car.
Old 04-25-02, 09:29 AM
  #39  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
79+80_rx-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Da Barrio!!!(Irving, Texas)
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, but looks like theres ALOT more wieght sitting more forward.. and thats bad.
Old 04-25-02, 09:30 AM
  #40  
Driven a turbo FB lately?

iTrader: (1)
 
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by peejay


No it doesn't.
It means Rotary eXport Attempt number whatever ? Right?
Old 04-25-02, 10:53 AM
  #41  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
87turbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to make it even worse check the link:
www.thewrongmotor.com
tsk tsk, when good 7's go bad
If there are any children present they may want to turn away
Old 04-25-02, 11:43 AM
  #42  
Driven a turbo FB lately?

iTrader: (1)
 
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if im wrong but that looks to be somewhat of a MAJOR bitch!
Old 04-25-02, 01:30 PM
  #43  
Administrator

iTrader: (8)
 
mar3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally posted by MIKE-P-28


Ok first im gonna say that will never NOT be a rotary in anything I drive. I like them But with a AL intake and AL heads. Hes right it isnt much heavier... I got a picture of a chevy in a 88 vert and it was weighed by Derek Biven's Chassis Designs (he builds race car frames and has a digital scale)

The car in the end was only about 62 pounds heavier than the orginal car.
Apples and oranges, Mike. The 13B is way heavier than a 12A. I believe the Ford is heavier than a mouse. You're still talking at least 100 lbs. up front even after full aluminum optimization of the 302 unless he goes aluminum block. That is the definition of an anchor. A Catalina 28' sailboat anchor weighs in the neighborhood of 50 lbs, so the Ford is technically correct in being characterized as an anchor in that poor, poor RX-7 that has been bastardized...
Old 04-25-02, 01:51 PM
  #44  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: valdosta,ga
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Im going to that kind of is just sickening



why , God help him see the error of his ways



pistons


V-8
Old 04-25-02, 02:15 PM
  #45  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,510
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Aww jeez...

Okay. The 302 is about the same weight as the 12A. Want proof? The front ride height will be the same after the swap. The front springs are only 100lb/in or so, so every additional 100lb would make the front end 1/2 inch lower. Too bad I didn't know about this sooner or I'd have asked ya to measure the ride height before and after

The weight distribution will still be a hell of a lot better than a GSL-SE (55/45) and TONS better than anything that engine could be found in stock. And, nothing else that engine could otherwise be found in has the looks and handling of an RX-7...

Believe it or not, putting a 302 in a 1st-gen isn't that difficult, so I'm told. Swap the crossmember around 180 degrees, make motor mount adapters, and you're 75% there. The EFI manifold will fit under the hood, the stock headers will clear everything... it actually fits the RX-7 better than it does in any Ford.

There is a lot of disinformation out there based on assumptions... assuming the rotary is light (it's not), assuming the V8 is heavy (it's not, especially a SBF), assuming the V8 is larger externally (it's not, when you factor in the manifolds and stuff).
Old 04-25-02, 02:22 PM
  #46  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,510
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally posted by mar3


Apples and oranges, Mike. The 13B is way heavier than a 12A. I believe the Ford is heavier than a mouse. You're still talking at least 100 lbs. up front even after full aluminum optimization of the 302 unless he goes aluminum block.
A 302 is MUCH lighter than the SBC. We're talking roughly an inch less deck height - that's a lot less mass. Also, Chevys are made out of very cheap iron, and they have a lot of wall thickness to make up for the weakness. (That's why so many SBCs have 4 bolt mains, you need that when you're threading into Play-Doh) Meanwhile, Ford uses much higher nickel content in their iron and they have much less metal in their castings, and they're still very strong. A stock 2-bolt main 302 block is good to about 600hp before the main webs start cracking.

You may not believe it, but that 302 probably weighs the same as the 12A that came out!
Old 04-25-02, 02:23 PM
  #47  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm putting my FB in storage, and when it comes out it will have a GN 3.8L in it. I drove it the other day and realized what a colossal waste of money my carb and exhaust were.
Old 04-25-02, 02:26 PM
  #48  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Directfreak


Et Tu, Caesar?

I didn't expect this from you Felix.

Are you partial to v8's in rotaries now, or do you really think I will denonate and blow up?

I am curious, because my system will be very similar to AJC13B's, In other words Big time power with reliability.

Also as far as that "Stealth" factor WinnipegGSL states, I think a V8 rumble will take care of that.
Well, I meant to say if, not when.

I'm a car person, not a rotary or V8 person.
Old 04-25-02, 02:31 PM
  #49  
Never Follow

iTrader: (18)
 
82transam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 8,309
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 51 Posts
Hey peejay, is mike right? rx is rotary export not rotary experimental like i said?
Old 04-25-02, 02:33 PM
  #50  
Your Opinion is Wrong

 
Dyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of California
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its rotary experiment....
Why would they call it Rotary eXport in Japan?


Quick Reply: Pics of the engine.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.