IRS swap
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mooresville, Indiana
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IRS swap
Wondering if anyone has successfully swapped in an IRS into their first gen. Im toying with the idea for now, looking specifically into a miata rear end or a ford 8.8 IRS.
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
several have tried, none have succeeded. to put IRS into a 1st gen requires basically back halving the whole car, which is a huge job. everyone also seems to think the FC suspension is an upgrade, and it isn't, at least the miata is ok.
#4
Old [Sch|F]ool
I want to go the other way, put a solid axle in a Miata. The Miata rear suspension does some funky things with toe that make the handling unpredictable if you have enough power to make the suspension squat heavily. Unless you stiffen the suspension to the point where it might as well be bolted solidly to the tub.
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
I want to go the other way, put a solid axle in a Miata. The Miata rear suspension does some funky things with toe that make the handling unpredictable if you have enough power to make the suspension squat heavily. Unless you stiffen the suspension to the point where it might as well be bolted solidly to the tub.
*for reasons unclear to me, the miata, Rx8 and newer Mazda's have 2-3" of bump travel and like a foot of droop/jounce/rebound travel. anyone who has tried to jack up an Rx8 knows what i mean, the car needs to be way high up, before a wheel comes off the ground, but put two people in the back and its on the bumpstops. miata is not as extreme, but its got more droop travel than bump travel.
of course the NC miata is backwards, the rear shocks top out, and it causes some really weird behavior
#6
Old [Sch|F]ool
When my friend got a GoPro courtesy of the SCCA, he stuck it on his Miata and went autocrossing.
The toe curve looks like a hockey stick... under droop it stays neutralish but under bump it toes in massively.
The toe curve looks like a hockey stick... under droop it stays neutralish but under bump it toes in massively.
Last edited by peejay; 11-19-15 at 04:45 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
actually the rear from the factory is usually setup for max grip, with lots of camber and toe gain, and then the front is setup with less camber gain, so the car understeers. if you look at any car, you'll see that the rear has negative camber, and the front doesn't.
#9
Old [Sch|F]ool
VW practically invented suspension kinematics for this... the twist beam rear suspensions they have traditionally used will have toe out under side load, which is sketchy at best and makes your Porsche spin out easily at worst, so VW realized that if they designed the suspension bushings with engineered in compliance and little ramps, they can cause toe IN under side loads.
And then there's Mazda's FC rear suspension design which took kinematics to the extreme, with toe-out and toe-in under side load depending on how MUCH load there was.
But all that usually only works right when the bushings are new, so it is more popular to do it with geometry. Downside with that is when some doofus lowers the suspension and puts it into the "cornering" regime...
#10
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
don't forget the british! their cars didn't roll over like the VW's, but they still contributed to the kinematics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rick_FullThrottle_Performance
V-8 Powered RX-7's
8
12-16-15 01:44 AM
sandy_RE
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
11-18-15 04:24 PM