1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

HITMAN finally got the 3 rotor in!

Old Oct 7, 2003 | 10:23 PM
  #51  
AdrenalifeRX7's Avatar
Are you gonna shift?!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally posted by RRTEC
All i have to say is that in my expereince with the first gen rx-7's is that every 1 mph you are traveling feels like 10mph faster then you really are traveling. These cars are ***** to the wall and anything over 130mph in this car would make me crap my pants.
So true.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:37 AM
  #52  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Originally posted by mmasid
Yes, we are talking about estimated top speeds. When I made my original post on this thread it was about hitmans estimated top speed of 330kph. I never said it was impossible. I never said that nobody has ever been able or will be able to do it. I stated my theory of cost versus speed and haven't yet heard any other theories. My whole point is that the faster you want to go the more $ your going to need.
That's exactly the point... you're wrong about what it takes to achieve these sort of speeds in an Rx-7. The car in that graph has no body mods whatsoever, stock steering and modified suspension based on "bolt in" components. In fact, I bet half the people on this forum have something similar in the steering and suspension departments. The driveline is nothing too out of the ordinary either. Simply a 13BT making great power, TII gearbox and a Series 2 diff with factory race LSD and tall gearing.

Don't bother disputing these FACTS unless you have something to add that's based on REAL experience and not just conjecture.

Sorry guys, I just couldn't resist any longer but some of these kids have a little to learn about the need for speed.
Comments like that won't make you any friends here. You're the one that came on here with an utterly stupid remark about it costing $5000 to gain 1mph and persisting with it while many people showed you to be wrong.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 03:42 AM
  #53  
rotary emotions's Avatar
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
From: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Aren't we mixing up a few facts here?
Some said you'll need more then "just" 800hp to get 200mph. Like suspension etc. Well, isn't the car we are talking about modified in any possible way?
And isn't it a bit stupid to claim the steering isn't up to the task if we are all driving 18-25 year old steering systems, often never overhauled? It seems very logic for me that you start with a car that's in perfect condition, not with an old wreck.
I'm more then convinced that a "new" first gen, or one that has been fully rebuild to as new condition, is very well able to run a straight line at higher speeds. As a matter of fact, my car never becomes unstable, and has done 130mph+ often enough. Ok, that's still not 200mph, but my car isn't halfway as modified as hitmans is.
As for the body: to reach higher speeds you'd need as less drag as possible, so you'll not gonna bolt on any useless wings. The racing beat record car was only lowered, and it didn't fly off the road, did it?
It's not the bodydesign that makes your cars handle bad, it's what's underneath. Keep in mind nothing lasts forever, and start rebuilding that suspension/steering/etc and then get everything alligned. You'll wonder how good a first gen handles, at speed!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 03:36 PM
  #54  
fatboy7's Avatar
Got Boost?
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 1
From: Watertown, MA
As for the body: to reach higher speeds you'd need as less drag as possible, so you'll not gonna bolt on any useless wings.
There are wings that not only lower the lift, but decrease the drag. The angle the rear glass is too steep on 1st gens, roughly 30* below the horizontal. Research has shown that to minimize the drag the rear window should slope down only 15* below horizontal. Adding a duck tail spoiler can make the effective angle very close to 15*, actually decreasing drag. That's what several SAE articles say. That fact is backed up by Mazda's own factory option spoiler. The addition of rear spoiler and front air dam is supposed to drop the coefficent of drag from .32 to .29.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2003 | 06:14 PM
  #55  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor, WA
that is totally awesome
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2003 | 06:23 PM
  #56  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor, WA
can you imagine taking a first gen to 200 wow....I think my old first gen would vibrate at 120 pretty crazy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
9
May 11, 2020 10:04 AM
SakeBomb Garage
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
8
Oct 9, 2015 10:05 PM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.