1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

8.8 rear end ride quality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2019 | 09:11 PM
  #1  
Hugehuman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
8.8 rear end ride quality

So I just bought a 8.8 and I know the biggest downfall is the unsprung mass of the unit. Can anyone shed some light on how bad the ride quality for a street car is going to be? And is there any way to combat the poor ride if it's really that bad?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2019 | 10:45 AM
  #2  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,869
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I didn't notice a difference when I went to the 9". On the other hand, my brakes are a lot lighter than the GSL-SE setup that I used to have, so the "polar moment" of the axle may be lower. Rearend weighs roughly 20-25% more than the GSL-SE stuff I took out thanks to a lot of lightweighting.

That said, the 8.8 is a remarkably light rearend for its size, especially if you get one out of a Mustang instead of a truck, since the trucks have much thicker tubes.

Last edited by peejay; Nov 10, 2019 at 10:47 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2019 | 01:17 PM
  #3  
Hugehuman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Ahhhhhh well I did get the one out of the explorer because I wanted the 31 spline. What kind of weight reduction did you perform on your 9 inch??
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2019 | 02:26 PM
  #4  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,869
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Aluminum centersection and pinion support, lightweight gears, light NASCAR type locker (think it's a Gforce, not sure), solid 10" rotors, aluminum calipers. I had GSL-SE pattern axles made but they didn't offer gun-drilling on flanged axles, otherwise I would have done that too. Rearend is something like 190lb.

I kind of wanted a floater rear, but I (erroneously) thought it would be more expensive, and it would have added weight. Maybe next time.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2019 | 03:35 PM
  #5  
WANKfactor's Avatar
Instrument Of G0D.
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 997
From: omnipresent
^ how did you go with clearnce around that big pumkin? Its a rally car right? Im guessing keeping full articulation may have required some massaging?

Just to add my input, went to a toyota hilux 8" diff. About 35kg more than the gslse diff with guru torsen, and ride quality was not affected noticeably to my suprise. If anything the weight seemed to aid turn in and forward traction.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2019 | 06:01 AM
  #6  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,869
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by WANKfactor
^ how did you go with clearnce around that big pumkin? Its a rally car right? Im guessing keeping full articulation may have required some massaging?

It was made more "interesting" by the fact that I also wanted to move the Watts pivot down to axle centerline instead of 40mm above. I also insisted on being able to drop the centersection out without having to remove any suspension components. I have the pinion offset a half inch to the left instead of 16mm to the right like Mazda did, so that also helped a bit. I ended up extending the upper part of the Watts something like 155mm, and extending the chassis side Watts bracket on the right side down by 60mm to keep the short link fairly level. I also shaved the top of the centersection and had to redo my 3rd link a bit for clearance.








Huge thread detailing general build and other stuff is here: https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/fo.../136340/page1/
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2019 | 02:23 PM
  #7  
Hugehuman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
there is days of reading in that thread. What made you stay with the watts link instead of a panhard bar for your tri link setup?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2019 | 04:31 PM
  #8  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,869
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
No room for a Panhard if I want a decent sized (read:streetable) muffler.

Plus, I have had issues with breaking Panhard brackets off, so I decided to keep it simple and just relocate the Watts to the height where I'd have put the Panhard.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
driftorx7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
Oct 26, 2006 01:02 AM
Michael_Rudy
Race Car Tech
12
Feb 27, 2005 10:21 AM
Kenku
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Jan 27, 2004 11:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 PM.