1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

4 Port 13B

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #26  
timedrapery's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by trochoid
I've been writing a reply for the last 2 days, hang in there.

The Tweak-It TBs are close, but you need 4 runners to do it right.

dj55b is running them or was going to switch over to them.
I can't wait to see the reply! Hahaha, you've got me checking the forum in my free time.

Also, what gearbox would you (or anyone else reading this) run behind a 1/2 bridge 4 port 13B? I'm thinking Turbo II but i know the ratios would probably not be "the best" for the powerband. Would a rebuilt S5 N/A box hold up fine with the amount of power?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 12:02 PM
  #27  
flight_of_pain's Avatar
its supposed to do that
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 2
From: PNW
Originally Posted by trochoid
I've been writing a reply for the last 2 days, hang in there.

The Tweak-It TBs are close, but you need 4 runners to do it right.

dj55b is running them or was going to switch over to them.

I have been gathering pats for quite a while to do something similar, but since my budget is small I scour the scrapyards. I picked up a pair of throttle bodies for some N/A 300zx(z32), Gloria's, and the 6cyl maxima. These are twin 40mm setups, and having two of them gives me 2 sets of 2 throttle butterflies, each pair is linked and has a TPS. My plan is a semi PP with the primaries one one set, and a small PP on the other. If you really want to be fun, get three sets of two and run primaries, secondaries and a PP. with a hellacious amount of manifold fab, they could be staged progressively.

Isaac
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #28  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
Originally Posted by orion84gsl
dj55b is using Fuji Racing ITB's.
My bad. At one point I thought he was looking at the Tweak-It TBs.


Originally Posted by timedrapery
I can't wait to see the reply! Hahaha, you've got me checking the forum in my free time.

Also, what gearbox would you (or anyone else reading this) run behind a 1/2 bridge 4 port 13B? I'm thinking Turbo II but i know the ratios would probably not be "the best" for the powerband. Would a rebuilt S5 N/A box hold up fine with the amount of power?
Have patience, it may not be done til Sunday eve or Monday. A TII tranny wouldn't hurt but the gear ratios and high rpm powerband for 1/2 bridge may not be the most desirable combo. Which ever you choose, have it rebuilt


Originally Posted by flight_of_pain
I have been gathering pats for quite a while to do something similar, but since my budget is small I scour the scrapyards. I picked up a pair of throttle bodies for some N/A 300zx(z32), Gloria's, and the 6cyl maxima. These are twin 40mm setups, and having two of them gives me 2 sets of 2 throttle butterflies, each pair is linked and has a TPS. My plan is a semi PP with the primaries one one set, and a small PP on the other. If you really want to be fun, get three sets of two and run primaries, secondaries and a PP. with a hellacious amount of manifold fab, they could be staged progressively.

Isaac
The Z32 throttle bodies sound interesting. I have an extra '87 Z31 but it's a single TB. Post some pics of the Z32s. Never have seen them. If you can set them up progressively you might be able to use the single Z31 TB for the primaries. The NA FCs have a large single butterfly for the primaries and a pair of smaller ones for the secondaries/auxiliary ports.

If I read this correctly, you're looking at running one pair of 40 mm TBs for the primaries, a second pair for the peri-port and not even using the secondary or aux ports? Now that could be very very interesting. Time to all Howard and have him get out the timing wheel.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #29  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 571
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by timedrapery
So you daily drive yours with a 1/2 bridge and an N/A intake manifold/injectors?
Yes, as long as the roads aren't salted.

Is it a pain in the *** and you just deal with it or have you gotten it smoothed out so it's "reasonable"?
Honestly, the only difficulty is cruising below about 30mph or accelerating gently from a stop. The main drivability issues i have are related to not having the warmup cycle properly tuned (this is the most time consuming thing to get right, and my laptop died before I could do it) and not having any kind of idle control. Basically, problems that happen on any engine.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #30  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by flight_of_pain
My plan is a semi PP
Isaac
i'd skip it and go full PP. mine is carbed, and its still in the tuning phase, but drivability is surprisingly good. i can putt around @10mph if i want to. its like PJ's car, but the PP doesn't seem as bad

i don't see what the semi PP would gain you, the full PP has more power @1000rpms than the stock 12A does....

the downside is NOISE, it comes from everywhere, particularly the intake
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #31  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 571
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
A thought - what kind of flywheel do you have? I'm running this SR aluminum unit and maybe it's light enough that at city cruise it doesn't damp out the engine's natural bucking as much as an iron one will, when the engine is at basically zero load.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #32  
WAS:12A's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 1
From: Perth, Western Australia
I don't know of anyone who uses Tweak It gear over here.

But ALOT of guys over here use EFI Hardware stuff.

LINK: http://www.efihardware.com/products/...ttle-Body-Kits

I converted my daily to a bridgeport, efi 50mm ida throttle body with 550cc injectors, microtech m4 fuel only computer....unfortunately I only drove it for about 20 miles before selling the car and going efi turbo! :O(

It was very smooth power delivery from what I remember.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:06 PM
  #33  
flight_of_pain's Avatar
its supposed to do that
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 2
From: PNW
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i'd skip it and go full PP. mine is carbed, and its still in the tuning phase, but drivability is surprisingly good. i can putt around @10mph if i want to. its like PJ's car, but the PP doesn't seem as bad

i don't see what the semi PP would gain you, the full PP has more power @1000rpms than the stock 12A does....

the downside is NOISE, it comes from everywhere, particularly the intake
A full PP has crossed my mind several times, but even putting around at 10mph, a full PP is using a ton of fuel (from what I have read/heard). With a progressive setup low load/low rpm would be fed through slightly massaged stock ports. While this would make less HP at low load/low rpm than a full PP it would also be capable of stock-like MPG, sort of a have your cake and eat it too .
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #34  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
Why don't you guys just build a proper 6-Port - with Bridged Secondaries?

You'll have good idle, good mileage, more torque than any PP, and still have plenty of power in the upper RPMs.

Not to mention...super availability of parts.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:46 PM
  #35  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by peejay
A thought - what kind of flywheel do you have? I'm running this SR aluminum unit and maybe it's light enough that at city cruise it doesn't damp out the engine's natural bucking as much as an iron one will, when the engine is at basically zero load.
i think you're right, i heavier flywheel would help. i have an RB aluminum one.

the PP will buck and snort, if its rich. it also helped a LOT to reduce intake manifold vacuum. two .025" holes made a HUGE difference in drivability
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #36  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by flight_of_pain
A full PP has crossed my mind several times, but even putting around at 10mph, a full PP is using a ton of fuel (from what I have read/heard). With a progressive setup low load/low rpm would be fed through slightly massaged stock ports. While this would make less HP at low load/low rpm than a full PP it would also be capable of stock-like MPG, sort of a have your cake and eat it too .
i don't know about the mileage yet. no license plates (its a race car), so i haven't gone far with it.

my next trip is the grocery store, its 3 blocks, but much internet bragging rights
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 12:44 AM
  #37  
rxtasy3's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,579
Likes: 290
From: Spartanburg, SC
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
it also helped a LOT to reduce intake manifold vacuum. two .025" holes made a HUGE difference in drivability
please elaborate more, u added these holes where?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 01:38 AM
  #38  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by rxtasy3
please elaborate more, u added these holes where?
throttle plates. part of an experiment to try and get the engine to idle on the carb's idle circuit.

that part didn't really work. and the holes only work in a range of sizes, too small, didn't do anything and too big and it didn't run anymore. currently its at .025" and i might go slightly larger, but i wanna work on the mains...
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 04:59 AM
  #39  
timedrapery's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by trochoid
My bad. At one point I thought he was looking at the Tweak-It TBs.




Have patience, it may not be done til Sunday eve or Monday. A TII tranny wouldn't hurt but the gear ratios and high rpm powerband for 1/2 bridge may not be the most desirable combo. Which ever you choose, have it rebuilt




The Z32 throttle bodies sound interesting. I have an extra '87 Z31 but it's a single TB. Post some pics of the Z32s. Never have seen them. If you can set them up progressively you might be able to use the single Z31 TB for the primaries. The NA FCs have a large single butterfly for the primaries and a pair of smaller ones for the secondaries/auxiliary ports.

If I read this correctly, you're looking at running one pair of 40 mm TBs for the primaries, a second pair for the peri-port and not even using the secondary or aux ports? Now that could be very very interesting. Time to all Howard and have him get out the timing wheel.
Bump to see if Trochoid is ready to spill those proverbial beans.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 08:24 PM
  #40  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 571
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I missed this...

Originally Posted by trochoid
A TII tranny wouldn't hurt but the gear ratios and high rpm powerband for 1/2 bridge may not be the most desirable combo.
Um.



Nice "high RPM powerband" there. More torque at 3200 than the same engine before the bridge did at peak.

This, BTW, was with total timing at only 18 degrees. And ignition breakup issues, thanks to some crappy plugs I was using.

Sadly, I have to go back to 6-port now, the rear end housing is FUBAR and I have no more TII stuff.

The trick to drivability, I found, is make it idle on the secondaries as much as possible. That way, there's minimal vacuum at the bridge, so it pulls less exhaust gases up. You still want to get your main driving airflow through the primary throttle, but minimizing vacuum at the secondaries is key to getting good drivability.

You do lose the brap, though.

I didn't realize how quiet my exhaust is until I shut the car off on the highway in gear and went WOT (trying to clear oil out of the intake manifold - long story) and the intake noise was almost as loud as when cruising at 65mph. That also does say something for how loud the intake is... and I'm not running a Weber or Holley style intake/throttle setup, just stock S4 N/A with a cone filter stuck out near the radiator.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 09:44 PM
  #41  
tweaked's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 948
Likes: 1
From: Memphis, TN
I've been doing lots of reading up on motors lately. I'm over due for a rebuild and want more n/a power.
I am looking in s5 rotors in REW with S4 front plate, Bridge secondary on s4 w/ s5 rotors, or a TII long block this S5 rotors.
I haven't found much info or feed back from people who did similar. Defined auto works said if I source the REW and front plate that it would cost around $2500 for the build with a street port. Said it has a broad torque curve.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 09:04 AM
  #42  
timedrapery's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by tweaked
I've been doing lots of reading up on motors lately. I'm over due for a rebuild and want more n/a power.
I am looking in s5 rotors in REW with S4 front plate, Bridge secondary on s4 w/ s5 rotors, or a TII long block this S5 rotors.
I haven't found much info or feed back from people who did similar. Defined auto works said if I source the REW and front plate that it would cost around $2500 for the build with a street port. Said it has a broad torque curve.
Bump for Trochoid and my fellow knowledge seeker right above me.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #43  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by peejay
and I have no more TII stuff.

The trick to drivability, I found, is make it idle on the secondaries as much as possible. That way, there's minimal vacuum at the bridge, so it pulls less exhaust gases up. You still want to get your main driving airflow through the primary throttle, but minimizing vacuum at the secondaries is key to getting good drivability.

You do lose the brap, though.
nobody had anymore t2 stuff, and the stuff they do have is all used and worse than yours! mazda has new parts but, you know.....

i found much the same with the P port, less intake vacuum = less brap = better manners.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 07:59 AM
  #44  
timedrapery's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by trochoid
Have patience, it may not be done til Sunday eve or Monday. A TII tranny wouldn't hurt but the gear ratios and high rpm powerband for 1/2 bridge may not be the most desirable combo. Which ever you choose, have it rebuilt.
Any news, brother man?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
Oct 14, 2015 12:31 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.