1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

1st gen Fully Adjustable Coilover Rear (minus camber)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #1  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
1st gen Fully Adjustable Coilover Rear (minus camber)

anywho, i've been working on this for awhile now that its pretty m uch 100% done, i figured i would post it up since i said i would back 6-8 months ago when i posted that i am doing it.

to start with I know that they setup is still, thats what i want, we'll see how it works in the spring















btw... that is a 8" Toyota rear end (axles are about twice the size of stock axles ) The coilovers are 6kg/mm (or 335lbs/in if you need the conversion) fully adjustable for height, and dampening (obviously not camber )

The front setup that im working on as of now for the front is 8kg/mm (450lbs/in) and fully camber, height, damping adjustable. the setup will consist of 84-85 rx7 front strut tubes mated to similar front coilover setup, an attached to it will be the great respeed big brake setup with a 5 lug setup

anywho, if you feel the need to ask a question on the setup, feel free.

~Nick
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #2  
Johnny Boost's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Loveland CO
Very nice!

I'll come up with some questions once I get home from work!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #3  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
Looks good. My only comment, from an engineering standpoint, would be to tie the top of the coilovers back down to the frame rails. Since you removed the strut tower, which is a major structural part, you will need to recreate it's properties. The long diagonal bar that the top is now tied to will have some minor flexural issues.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #4  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,857
Likes: 3,243
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by trochoid
Looks good. My only comment, from an engineering standpoint, would be to tie the top of the coilovers back down to the frame rails. Since you removed the strut tower, which is a major structural part, you will need to recreate it's properties. The long diagonal bar that the top is now tied to will have some minor flexural issues.
i agree, theres a helluva lot of load at the strut towers.

an example from real life

ground control camber plates, 1/8" aluminum, these fail by breaking. aluminum doesnt bend. what kind of force is there to break 1/8" aluminum? especially since its connected to the shock!

now this is in a racing environment, and its fairly rare, but thats the kind of force that the suspension encounters
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #5  
Jeezus's Avatar
Stu-Tron Get Yo Groove On
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 31
From: Huntsville AL
Sweet set-up!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Bryan, TX
Is that the stock watts link that I see? Have you thought about going to a panhard or 3-link setup since you changed over the rear end?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #7  
KansasCityREPU's Avatar
Out In the Barn
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,709
Likes: 1,252
From: KC
Originally Posted by trochoid
Looks good. My only comment, from an engineering standpoint, would be to tie the top of the coilovers back down to the frame rails. Since you removed the strut tower, which is a major structural part, you will need to recreate it's properties. The long diagonal bar that the top is now tied to will have some minor flexural issues.
Could it be as simple as tying the top of each coilover to the opposite framerail?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #8  
BlackWorksInc's Avatar
Wrkn Toyota, Rootn Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 1
From: "Haystack" Hayward, CA
Yeah I agree, I would have modified the stock strut tower to fit the Coil-Overs in, the car had them for a reason... Now the roll cage is both supporting the frame of the car and your suspension... I doubt it, but if you hit a very nasty turn or bump those mounts might warp or break.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #9  
FBsliderseven's Avatar
domokun!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
rear strut bar?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #10  
dbragg's Avatar
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
what did that toyota rearend come out of? did you do all the cutting to shorten it for the FB body?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #11  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
Looks good and great fab skills, but the question is why? With a solid axle rear end... Enlighten me
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #12  
MtotheIKEo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Lodi, Ca
Originally Posted by mikewoodkozar
Looks good and great fab skills, but the question is why? With a solid axle rear end... Enlighten me
what does having a solid axle have to do with it?

And as long as the welding was done right I really doubt those mounts will break, or even flex.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #13  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
well to be honest the setup is not 100% quite yet but structually its pretty much all there, i will be making a welded in strut brace that goes across the two NEW strut towers. the two bars that you see that hold the coilover up will be gusseted in to increase its strength, so added gussets and a solid strut bar, should by far be plenty strong for this light of a car.

DemonSpawn the rear strut tower setup was almost an inch too small in diameter so it would have needed to be cut nearly completely out anyways to make it work...

mikewoodkozar I used the solid because completely fabbing up a IRS setup would have taken alot more time, and would have been MUCH MUCH more difficult to figure out to work properly

aws140 Nope no cutting of the rear axle, that is what you see (besides the mounts) underneath a stock toyota mini truck (91-93 toyota pickup i believe?)

dantheman I stayed with the stock watts setup because mazda did alot of engineering, and the car can be made to handle VERY well with it, so why change something thats been proven time and time again?

Also on another note, this car Is being designed to be VERY versatile from AutoX, Drift, to drag. This car is being built for it all. will it be the fastest drag car...no. will it be the best drift or autox car...no. But i guarauntee it will be faster that 90% of the cars that do those things though, and that in all is enough to say i've succeeded in building a car that can compete in anything and be successful.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #14  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
btw...thanks everyone for your comments and questions, im just here to try something different, and hopefully learn and have everyone else learn stuff that is possible, but not thought of for our cars.

also thanks trochoid you always have something useful to say, and me and you are thinking along the same lines, i also agree that the car is yet stable enough to throw on the road quite yet without some more tweaking of its mounts. we'll also find out how it holds up in the long run as going from autoX (with R-comp tires) to the drags with the 8.5x26 et slicks, will certainly put my fab work to the test.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:36 PM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Bryan, TX
awsome! Glad to see someone doing something different back there. I look forward to seeing this project finished.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #16  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
it's always nice to see someone changing the rear suspesion design!

no offense but the 1st gen watts link is one of the worst I've ever seen. it's been proven to be bad geometry. waaaaayyyy too high and offset to one side. the center pivot bends and breaks. has everything wrong with it. mazda went with a quick solution for that.

and the upper trailing links are short and angled, those are bad too. doing a real 4 link with more adjustability would be in your best interest, especially for drag so you can crank up the anti-squat. for auto-x I think you're bumped all the way up to MOD class due to the rear coilovers which also moved the upper suspension pickup point.

the mounting for the coilover tops isn't the best, it needs some work. i'd also box in the lower brackets for the coilovers.

best of luck, keep us updated. and above all have FUN.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:34 AM
  #17  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Originally Posted by DriveFast7
it's always nice to see someone changing the rear suspesion design!

no offense but the 1st gen watts link is one of the worst I've ever seen. it's been proven to be bad geometry. waaaaayyyy too high and offset to one side. the center pivot bends and breaks. has everything wrong with it. mazda went with a quick solution for that.

and the upper trailing links are short and angled, those are bad too. doing a real 4 link with more adjustability would be in your best interest, especially for drag so you can crank up the anti-squat. for auto-x I think you're bumped all the way up to MOD class due to the rear coilovers which also moved the upper suspension pickup point.

the mounting for the coilover tops isn't the best, it needs some work. i'd also box in the lower brackets for the coilovers.

best of luck, keep us updated. and above all have FUN.
thanks for the info. Didnt realize that watts setup had so many issues. reason also for not doing a 4 link is im trying to do this somewhat on a budget with cheaper parts (also makes it more attainable for someone else to do this also).

btw i love your REPU and your 7 looks pretty damn nice also good job!

P.S, i only have around 950 bucks into the rear suspension which i think is pretty good for how tough it should be. especially with the dampening and height adjustablity.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:35 AM
  #18  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
oh...and yes i will be in mod class, we'll see how it performs once i get the front setup done, and get the full poly setup and new RB swap bars in should be basically like a rock, which i suppose is good and bad...
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #19  
FBsliderseven's Avatar
domokun!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
i wanna see this thing drifting!
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 01:01 AM
  #20  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
lol me too
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #21  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Bryan, TX
A custom 3 link setup won't be that expensive since you can weld and don't mind holes in your floor.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #22  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
If you look under the rear of almost any racing RX7, you will find a 3link/panhard setup. I recently purchased one myself, but haven't installed it yet. The overall design looks pretty simple, and I've heard of people fabbing their own. With what I've seen of your skills so far, it shouldn't be much of a job for you. Nice work so far.

I do have one question though. You could have achieved adjustable dampening with Illumina shocks, adjustable ride height with adjustable collars (which I just installed and love), and had about 700 bucks left over for the 3link/panhard setup (which only runs about 300 if I remember right). Were you not aware of this, or did you just want to do your own thing? I just ask, because with the setup I just mentioned you could have run in Street Prepared rather than mod....
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #23  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
^^^ yes i did know of this option, however since this car WILL be in every type of racing i needed the suspension to be as interchangeable as possible, the 3rd member on this can easily swap out gears ect, and is alot more solid than the 1st gen setups. imagine this kinda as a grannys rear end swap but without the stock spring and strut setup. (which grannys rear swaps cost about as much as mine in the long run). Since The rear setup is (240sx coilovers) i can also substitute stock 240 spring/strut combo for a really soft rear suspension for drag racing. Like i said this setup is setup to be versatile.

~Nick

btw, thanks for the comments on the work Kentetsu
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #24  
legokcen's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 841
Likes: 2
From: Albany, GA
Will the lower suspension connection on the rear axle support the rear weight? I'm just asking, I've heard it may not be strong enough.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #25  
driftking777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
to be honest the shop that all this work is being done at does rock crawlers (I.E. constant drops from 5-15ft, roll overs, constand load and preloading, ect) and there mounts have never broken. so i would feel safe to say my will hold up
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.