Now THIS is a Wide Body! (pics)
Reminds me a little of the GTO kit which I thought about getting for mine. Although, as someone mentioned (5 years ago, lol), I would need to have the motor to back it up.
http://www.mariahmotorsports.com/ext...ngbodypkgs.htm
~T.J.
http://www.mariahmotorsports.com/ext...ngbodypkgs.htm
~T.J.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Some people were saying this is supposed to have a rear spoiler, but i just found this model of a `81 LeMans car.
http://www.diecastcars.tv/product_in...oducts_id=6781
No wing.
http://www.diecastcars.tv/product_in...oducts_id=6781
No wing.
http://bp3.blogger.com/_L-XlgbsEZfg/...500_Abarth.jpg
Thats bad as. Love it. Yeh that rear end, if it had a smooth under side to help suck air smoothly under the body and up at the end would provide mega downforce, its a HUGE diffuser and guessing that its based on a race car makes perfect sense. Downforce with less drag than a wing.
Rear mounted 13bt, 20b? haha!
Rear mounted 13bt, 20b? haha!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
((V^2)/2)+(gh)+(P/p)=constant
And of double entendres... though I may be alone in that?

To create downforce without creating rearward drag, the underside of the long back deck should be either an invert airfoil shape, tapering upward, or a more abrupt but still solid rear chop - - think of the back end of the newer Vettes.
As it is, it's creating INward vacuum along the sides and rearward vacuum from the sudden undirected pressure decrease behind the recessed tail, as well as non-laminar drag along the inside and outside surfaces of the verticals.
Frankly, looking at the rear, it looks like an unfinished project.
Last edited by DivinDriver; Aug 5, 2008 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Completing thought
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whizzybang
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
21
Feb 10, 2017 12:08 PM
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Aug 23, 2015 09:28 AM



So, you're saying the back end is SUPPOSED to suck that hard?


