1st Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 1st Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

Now THIS is a Wide Body! (pics)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:30 AM
  #51  
TheRX7Project's Avatar
Daily Beaten
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 592
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee
LOL a 5-year-old thread... roborn!
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:10 AM
  #52  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Reminds me a little of the GTO kit which I thought about getting for mine. Although, as someone mentioned (5 years ago, lol), I would need to have the motor to back it up.

http://www.mariahmotorsports.com/ext...ngbodypkgs.htm

~T.J.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:42 AM
  #53  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Originally Posted by FirebirdSlayer666
That vacuum pocket under the rear is what would keep the rear in on the ground instead of a wing. I dig it alot. Oh and HOLY THREAD RESSURECTION MR. WAYNE
So, you're saying the back end is SUPPOSED to suck that hard?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #54  
OnlyOnThurs's Avatar
TACOCAT
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 2
From: Milky Way
+1! this thread is OLD!!! lol...it looks like that rx7 can fly lol
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #55  
FirebirdSlayer666's Avatar
Famous Taillights
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown, MD
Originally Posted by DivinDriver
So, you're saying the back end is SUPPOSED to suck that hard?
It creates enough vacuum underneath to keep the rear stable.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #56  
PercentSevenC's Avatar
I need a new user title
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 1
From: Yaizu, Japan
Originally Posted by DivinDriver
So, you're saying the back end is SUPPOSED to suck that hard?
It's easy to see why it's that way if you have a basic understanding of aerodynamics.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #57  
Paul Loatman's Avatar
The Chartist
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Some people were saying this is supposed to have a rear spoiler, but i just found this model of a `81 LeMans car.

http://www.diecastcars.tv/product_in...oducts_id=6781

No wing.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #58  
Paul Loatman's Avatar
The Chartist
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Originally Posted by DivinDriver
No WONDER my Bondo stock went through the roof recently.

...Maybe the wing unfolds from under the hatch?...

No, wait: the hatch IS the wing! It pops up like a speed brake!
The idea of the hatch being a wing isn't so far fetched, the original Abarth Fiat 500 used the rear hatch (which was essentially where the engine was) as an aerodynamic component of the car. Not only was it used as most spoilers are, but it was also used for running air from the front of the car through the car and out the open hatch, keeping the air flowing through the car and not around it and keeping the engine cool at the same time.

http://bp3.blogger.com/_L-XlgbsEZfg/...500_Abarth.jpg
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #59  
Jimbo II's Avatar
Rotating
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 605
Likes: 7
From: New Zealand
Thats bad as. Love it. Yeh that rear end, if it had a smooth under side to help suck air smoothly under the body and up at the end would provide mega downforce, its a HUGE diffuser and guessing that its based on a race car makes perfect sense. Downforce with less drag than a wing.

Rear mounted 13bt, 20b? haha!
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 08:30 PM
  #60  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Originally Posted by PercentSevenC
It's easy to see why it's that way if you have a basic understanding of aerodynamics.
I do, thank you..., including the concepts of both lift AND drag.

((V^2)/2)+(gh)+(P/p)=constant

And of double entendres... though I may be alone in that?

To create downforce without creating rearward drag, the underside of the long back deck should be either an invert airfoil shape, tapering upward, or a more abrupt but still solid rear chop - - think of the back end of the newer Vettes.

As it is, it's creating INward vacuum along the sides and rearward vacuum from the sudden undirected pressure decrease behind the recessed tail, as well as non-laminar drag along the inside and outside surfaces of the verticals.

Frankly, looking at the rear, it looks like an unfinished project.

Last edited by DivinDriver; Aug 5, 2008 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Completing thought
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 08:42 AM
  #61  
slayerx7's Avatar
The nonspatial continuum
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Does ayone know wha hatch that is? Or where to find one? The only other custom hatch Ive seen is the Mariah, which this one clearly is not.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 05:06 AM
  #62  
slayerx7's Avatar
The nonspatial continuum
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
*bump
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
Feb 28, 2018 11:27 AM
whizzybang
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
21
Feb 10, 2017 12:08 PM
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Aug 23, 2015 09:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.