Build Threads The place to discuss complete builds

RENESISFD's Robust Build: Powered by Pepperoni Pizza and Chikken Nuggets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 09:47 AM
  #326  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
Originally Posted by mannykiller
Some engineers would argue smaller pipe diameter is beneficial for air velocity/response.
Obviously a smaller pipe will increase air velocity and responce, but at some point there will be diminshing returns.It will choke at the top end. So since you are so worried aboput response are you going to use a straw for your piping . You can pick up flex straws at McDonalds for your bends, also definately scrap the intercooler because of all the air space that needs to be pressurized hurting your response.

One engineer could also argue that larger piping on the outlet side is beneficial because it allows the slowing down of air through the intercooler core allowing more time for the intake charge to cool.

It is all a compromise. You want maximum response well that is going to hurt your top end, you want top end well response is going to suffer.

Since we are on the topic of response; why did you choose the GTX compressor wheel, it is less efficent at lower pressure ratios which will hurt your response. Also, you stated that you do not want to run more than about 20PSI and that is the point where the billet wheel starts to be more efficient than the cast wheel. Just curious.


Originally Posted by TwinCharged RX7
Word, the 2.75" pipe sucks for using cool clamps. I had to make special adapters and that made my pipes look a little funny.

How are you guys mounting your AN fuel lines to the bottom of the car? I'm not having good luck making it look clean and secure.
Right now I am using the stock lines under the car. When I go E85 I will worry about the stock lines then. Are you talking braded lines?

I will be bending up stainless for that purpose.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 02:47 PM
  #327  
MOBEONER's Avatar
It's finally reliable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,514
Likes: 10
From: NEW YORK CITY
His Vmount pipeing is very short so it's alot faster to fill than front mount, I don't think his 3" IC pipes will make much of a difference when it come to spool. I actualy spoke to him a while about about pipe size and he already had it all figured out
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2012 | 01:20 PM
  #328  
mannykiller's Avatar
Garage Hero
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (93)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 19
From: Quartz Hill

hmmm well obviously you didn't see the guy's question asking you about why you chose the pipe diameter you did. I was simply offering my opinion on the diameter.. not critisizing your build.
Also... using larger piping on the outlet side of an IC core to cool the charge by allowing the air to slow down? come on.. that sounds like horrible compensation for poor I/C core size choice.
I chose the GTX3582r because it's 10-13% more efficient than the previous GT series turbo's. It's an all around better turbo. I would like to get used to lower power on the track before I turn up the boost. Why GTX? room to grow! I'm also trying to make as much power at as low PSI as possible. The billet wheel will aid that

Originally Posted by RENESISFD
Obviously a smaller pipe will increase air velocity and responce, but at some point there will be diminshing returns.It will choke at the top end. So since you are so worried aboput response are you going to use a straw for your piping . You can pick up flex straws at McDonalds for your bends, also definately scrap the intercooler because of all the air space that needs to be pressurized hurting your response.

One engineer could also argue that larger piping on the outlet side is beneficial because it allows the slowing down of air through the intercooler core allowing more time for the intake charge to cool.

It is all a compromise. You want maximum response well that is going to hurt your top end, you want top end well response is going to suffer.

Since we are on the topic of response; why did you choose the GTX compressor wheel, it is less efficent at lower pressure ratios which will hurt your response. Also, you stated that you do not want to run more than about 20PSI and that is the point where the billet wheel starts to be more efficient than the cast wheel. Just curious.




Right now I am using the stock lines under the car. When I go E85 I will worry about the stock lines then. Are you talking braded lines?

I will be bending up stainless for that purpose.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 01:03 PM
  #329  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Still on track for dyno tuning? Good luck!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 01:06 PM
  #330  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
^ Yea, I have the car running and have been driving it. I am just waiting for the tuner to be free so it can get done. Most likely will be Monday.

Thanks Elliott



John
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2012 | 01:28 PM
  #331  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
Originally Posted by mannykiller
*ugly pic of prince*
hmmm well obviously you didn't see the guy's question asking you about why you chose the pipe diameter you did. I was simply offering my opinion on the diameter.. not critisizing your build.
Also... using larger piping on the outlet side of an IC core to cool the charge by allowing the air to slow down? come on.. that sounds like horrible compensation for poor I/C core size choice.
I chose the GTX3582r because it's 10-13% more efficient than the previous GT series turbo's. It's an all around better turbo. I would like to get used to lower power on the track before I turn up the boost. Why GTX? room to grow! I'm also trying to make as much power at as low PSI as possible. The billet wheel will aid that
I am not mad. Sorry I came off a bit harsh. I asked a few people to read my reply and they said that it was a bit harsh. I did not mean for it to come off that way. I should have picked better wording. Most of what I typed was meant to be a joke.

The reason for the larger piping is not to make up for poor intercooler size selection, it allows me to run a smaller cooler so I have room for the CAI and for the battery in the front. I am going to make some ducting so the turbo is fed fresh air. It is my opinion that people who run a large intercooler and then feed their turbo hot air from the intercooler are doing it wrong. IMHO you are much better off having a smaller intercooler and having a CAI.

The problem with the GT35r turbos and the GTX35R turbo is thae restrictive exhaust turbine. Also, the problem that there is no true t4 housing available for either turbo. Inorder for you to take full advantage of the GTX wheel you need to run higher pressure ratios and increase flow out of the turbine side. You cant just look at the compressor side of the turbo, you also need to consider how well the exhaust flows through the turbo. So IMHO you will not make much more power using the GTX turbo because you still have the restrictive exhaust turbine. And when you turn up the power the engine will choke because you will be unable to get the exhaust gasses through the turbo efficently.




On a side note, I have an appointment for Tuesday to get the car tuned.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2012 | 11:36 PM
  #332  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
John I made you a painting this weekend to celebrate our friendship....

Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 09:03 AM
  #333  
Supernaut's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles CA
That's glorious Rich. You've got some real talent there.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 09:31 AM
  #334  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
So what are the numbers dude.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 09:45 AM
  #335  
silverTRD's Avatar
Time or Money, Pick one
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 169
From: Torrance, ca.
its getting tuned tomorrow he said...
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 09:49 AM
  #336  
Liborek's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Czech republic
Originally Posted by RENESISFD
why did you choose the GTX compressor wheel, it is less efficent at lower pressure ratios which will hurt your response.
I'm not really sure how did you figured this out

For example regular GT3582R at 2.0 PR and 60 lbs/min airflow is 60% efficient, GTX version is about 70% efficient. Basically any flow point at any pressure ratio is more efficient with largest gains being on the right side of the map, only thing which suffers slightly is that surge line is shifted slightly to the right.

Originally Posted by mannykiller
I chose the GTX3582r because it's 10-13% more efficient than the previous GT series turbo's.
Peak efficiency is pretty much the same. Difference is in the peak flow and efficiency at these higher flow rates.

Originally Posted by RENESISFD
The problem with the GT35r turbos and the GTX35R turbo is that restrictive exhaust turbine.
While this is true and ultimately limits power capability of this very high flow compressor, higher efficiency of compressor itself allows for lower backpressure at same flow and pressure ratio.

In the end, turbo itself is only one part of the system, "things" after turbo have huge impact on turbine inlet pressure
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2012 | 09:52 AM
  #337  
MOBEONER's Avatar
It's finally reliable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,514
Likes: 10
From: NEW YORK CITY
Rich get your own bitch- this one is already spoken for

Reply
Old Apr 21, 2012 | 05:43 PM
  #338  
Dhark00's Avatar
No Life.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Originally Posted by RENESISFD
I worked on making the hard lines for the wastegate coolant and turbo coolant. I need to order a different tee to finish the job on the coolant return side. I was just not happy with how it looked.

Start off with straight tubing. I used -6 .035 wall 316l stainless tubing and -4 .020 wall 316l stainless tubing

[...]

Great build, where did you get the tubing?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 09:49 AM
  #339  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
Update:

Car made the 1800 mile round trip to deals gap with the only issue being a stuck open secondary Injector on the jersey turnpike, thanks to Brian and lance for helping to quickly diagnose the problem.

Btw, the car made approxmately 395 whp at 15 psi on my original 65k mile engine.



John
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 07:57 PM
  #340  
shawnm565's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 889
Likes: 14
From: Minnesota
Good numbers! I am still hoping for 500hp on my car! 3 more weeks!
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 03:37 PM
  #341  
lane_change's Avatar
It has begun
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 17
From: Houston, TX
Did you get the Racepak installed? Curious to see pics of the installation of your IQ3.
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 05:53 PM
  #342  
Scrub's Avatar
bow leggin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by lane_change
Did you get the Racepak installed? Curious to see pics of the installation of your IQ3.
You're still around? haha I don't think I've seen you post in forever!
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 07:14 PM
  #343  
lane_change's Avatar
It has begun
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 17
From: Houston, TX
Yea, I got a build of my own going on and am also going with the IQ3. I bought a couple extra gauge face panels to see how I want to go about installing it flush into the stock face panel with some fiberglass work. Also, going to be molding in the start button, keeping the headlight pop up switch, but rigging it to be my light switch for my sleek mounts, and then trying to add an aftermarket fuel gauge into the stock fuel gauge pod....but who knows, maybe someone did something better or something else that I need to think about doing before I start spending money making the mounts and stuff.

I just got back into an FD a few months back....trying to get my groove back after leaving the community for a few years. This build and others definitely gave me the itch to start another FD project.
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 07:36 PM
  #344  
Scrub's Avatar
bow leggin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
Yeah man there are definitely some incredible builds going on right now. It's nice to see people putting so much detail into their builds....Especially this guy John lol, he's very particular.
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 08:09 PM
  #345  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
Originally Posted by lane_change
Did you get the Racepak installed? Curious to see pics of the installation of your IQ3.
It is nothing fancy. I just bought this mount http://949racing.com/racepak-iq3-mount.aspx and used screws to mount it to the steering column cover. It is temporary until this winter when I hope to make some type of fiberglass panel to replace the stock gauges.


Dan: Thanks for the backwards compliment.
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #346  
MOBEONER's Avatar
It's finally reliable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,514
Likes: 10
From: NEW YORK CITY
Word on the street is that John is selling is FD to get a twin turbo vette cuz mazdas are slow .. Thats what I heard!!!!
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 08:22 PM
  #347  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
^ Have you been drinking again? Cuz that is the only way you could believe some stupid **** like that.
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 11:07 PM
  #348  
lane_change's Avatar
It has begun
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 17
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by RENESISFD
It is nothing fancy. I just bought this mount http://949racing.com/racepak-iq3-mount.aspx and used screws to mount it to the steering column cover. It is temporary until this winter when I hope to make some type of fiberglass panel to replace the stock gauges.


Dan: Thanks for the backwards compliment.
Got any pics? How close to the steering wheel does it sit?
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 08:20 AM
  #349  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
I will try to get some up today or tomorrow
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #350  
ssonsk's Avatar
Don't worry, Be happy
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: where the fish fly and the birds swim, (Ga)
There is no try

Only Do
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.