Wrong, it would be an LSX-7. That actually sounds pretty good. Why don't all you LS1 numnuts take your RX-7 badges off because you don't have an rx-7 anymore and make some LSX-7 badges. hehe

 

Hehe, wrong, hehe. hehe

 

hehe





....hehe

 

Yo can I haz dat shiet for $30 shipped? Aight peace one luv WEST SIDE!!!

 

NIkka wats up with the WEST SIDE ****!! nikka you live in the east side son!

 

Man, the ebonics used in this thread " iz hella wackness shizzle n ish son.....yo".....shiiiieet.

 

Yeah, I heard that too.

I have to say one thing for the rotary engine... it sure makes the dumbshits easy to identify.

 

your a dumbshit with no rotary so thats a false statement.

 

Thanks for proving my point.

 

EDIT: Nevermind, irrelevant to this thread. Don't want to spoil the fun.

 

 

Ok then. Let me try and clarify Mr. Fuzzy's contention.

You're (reference to Jim Lab) a dumbshit with no rotary.

JimLab's response

Thank you for proving my point.

Did I get that right?

 

Correct!

 

+ Fuzzy =

 

Lmao!!!

 

= Ownage to all you lesser beings(aka rotorist)

 

I smelled a ton of bullshit and came in here and saw v8 7's... least I know my sense of smell is still in top shape

Seriously tho, here's how to break it down. Both are effecient in some way, one may be more unique then the other, but one can be more reliable then the other. The only thing that seperates them is:

V8 = Redneck

Rotory = Anything but Redneck

/discussion

edit to add: My N/A was going to be LS1 swapped. But the fun was in the TII

 

 

blah blah blah
i win
lol, and it would be an xr-7, hello!!! like the cougars japanese cuzin from another mother thrice removed

 

there you point well taken !!!!

 

V8 = Redneck? Is that honestly the best you could come up with? Like, oh my God. Oh noez!!1!!

Rotary = failure, from both a physics and a marketing standpoint. End of story.

Besides, most of you crybabies own rotary cars that are no more technologically advanced than a 1953 farm truck. And not much faster.

 

yeeeeeep.... Tell her!

 

Pretty good marketing/sales failure.....they made that FAILURE last well over 2 decades and more if you go back closer to your farm truck if you use NSU/ Stillmans
Maybe we should all get more of a K car looking vehicle like yours

 

Oh im sorry, you are

 

Big ******* deal. Chevrolet sold more Camaros in the first 3 years of production alone than Mazda sold RX-7s overall... and then went on to sell 4.3 Million more.

Ask Mazda which success story they'd rather have.

Total Mazda RX-7 production, worldwide = 812,152

1st Gen.
1978 - 72,692
1979 - 71,617
1980 - 56,317
1981 - 55,321
1982 - 59,686
1983 - 57,864
1984 - 63,959
1985 - 63,105
Total = 500,561

2nd Gen.
1986 - 72,760
1987 - 52,204
1988 - 34,592
1989 - 37,642
1990 - 29,411
1991 - 16,623
1992 - 500 (commemorative convertibles)
Total = 243,732

3rd Gen.
1992 - 26,899
1993 - 6,801
1994 - 5,962
1995 - 5,202
1996 - 4,762
1997 - 3,556
1998 - 1,423
1999 - 4,151
2000 - 2,611
2001 - 2,589
2002 - 3,903
Total = 67,859

Total Chevrolet Camaro production, worldwide = 5,143,788

1st Gen.
1967 - 285,748
1968 - 276,124
1969 - 280,858
Total = 842,730

2nd Gen.
1970 - 152,037
1971 - 133,034
1972 - 80,015
1973 - 112,884
1974 - 151,008
1975 - 152,770
1976 - 198,814
1977 - 235,879
1978 - 272,631
1979 - 282,571
1980 - 152,005
1981 - 126,139
Total = 2,049,787

3rd Gen.
1982 - 189,747
1983 - 154,381
1984 - 231,591
1985 - 201,195
1986 - 241,804
1987 - 138,260
1988 - 96,275
1989 - 110,850
1990 - 35,048
1991 - 101,316
1992 - 70,712
Total = 1,571,179

4th Gen.
1993 - 39,755
1994 - 119,934
1995 - 122,844
1996 - 63,827
1997 - 97,912
1998 - 77,198
1999 - 42,098
2000 - 45,417
2001 - 29,009
2002 - 42,098
Total = 680,092

Coming from someone with the cars listed in your signature, that's ******* hilarious.