V-8 Weight nolonger a viable argument

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 11:03 PM
  #276  
revvingGS's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 2
From: Moorhead, MN
What happend to this section? haha I check in and there is pages and pages of threads!
On the topic of weight, I would bet that my nearly stock 5.3 has better power to weight ratio than my old 12a had. I wish I could weight the complete longblock before I stick it back in soon.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 12:52 AM
  #277  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
Has any one ever corner weighted a standard FD, a single turbo FD and a v8 swapped FD? There is a v8 swapped FD for sale for £11.5k really tempted by it, just short of 500 HP and torque. It would cost much more than that for a single turbo setup for same power including buying a car.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 03:09 AM
  #278  
Ruler_Mark's Avatar
I can't see my car **(
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 8
From: Central FL
I had these coilovers on a mostly stock 93 rx7, same wheel/tire it was slightly tucking the tire... on my stripped 93 with ls3 it did this..

V-8 Weight nolonger a viable argument-6cgv0l.jpg
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 04:39 AM
  #279  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
Hmm looks like it could weigh less at the back. What about the front? It could have been that high at the rear because of these so called boat anchors on the front? the v8 section has got to be the best at the moment for crazy builds!!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 11:31 AM
  #280  
Ruler_Mark's Avatar
I can't see my car **(
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 8
From: Central FL
ignore my post, we did the a arms upside down LOL
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 12:05 PM
  #281  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
Originally Posted by Ruler_Mark
ignore my post, we did the a arms upside down LOL
Ha, yeh I saw on your thread don't worry, first time I stripped my subframe and put it back in I got them the wrong way around
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 05:55 PM
  #282  
NorthWest7's Avatar
In the Air
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Seattle WA
Here is a link to v8 fd vs. a rotary fd on curb weight scales, "suprisingly" the v8 fd actually had a better 50/50 distribution. Boom! Case closed! Ponycars.Net - RX7 with LS1 motor
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 10:26 PM
  #283  
Supernaut's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles CA
Originally Posted by NorthWest7
Here is a link to v8 fd vs. a rotary fd on curb weight scales, "suprisingly" the v8 fd actually had a better 50/50 distribution. Boom! Case closed! Ponycars.Net - RX7 with LS1 motor
Not quite. It's not only about weight but of center of gravity. The majority of the weight on the rotary sits pretty damn low. Also, you're comparing apples to oranges. If you want to compare the two, do it with a rotary car that is modified, not one that is stock. The rotary car still has emissions and PS/AC.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 02:14 AM
  #284  
NorthWest7's Avatar
In the Air
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Seattle WA
^ I see your point, but its still a difference of almost 60lbs lighter up front with the v8, which isnt that bad, and I've seen modified motor mounts that allowed the Ls motor to sit lower in the engine bay. I'm not a rotary hater, i enjoy it very much and i've still got one in my fd, my fd is completely stock so im seriously considering not doing anything to it and keeping it original, i am however going to get a second fd when i get home from deployment, and it will be getting a v8.

Last edited by NorthWest7; Oct 11, 2012 at 02:22 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2012 | 09:44 AM
  #285  
ZDan's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 682
Likes: 4
From: Pawtucket, RI
Yank rotary, drop in LSx, keeping p/s and a/c, you will add weight to the front.
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2012 | 11:53 AM
  #286  
fidelity101's Avatar
Rallye RX7
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 110
From: MI/CHI
Originally Posted by ZDan
Yank rotary, drop in LSx, keeping p/s and a/c, you will add weight to the front.
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
I like how the NX was compared to all those other cars in there, that wasn't very fair lol.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MILOS7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
May 9, 2016 06:39 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 PM.