V-8 Weight nolonger a viable argument
#276
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moorhead, MN
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What happend to this section? haha I check in and there is pages and pages of threads!
On the topic of weight, I would bet that my nearly stock 5.3 has better power to weight ratio than my old 12a had. I wish I could weight the complete longblock before I stick it back in soon.
On the topic of weight, I would bet that my nearly stock 5.3 has better power to weight ratio than my old 12a had. I wish I could weight the complete longblock before I stick it back in soon.
#277
RX 4BPT
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Huddersfield, England
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has any one ever corner weighted a standard FD, a single turbo FD and a v8 swapped FD? There is a v8 swapped FD for sale for £11.5k really tempted by it, just short of 500 HP and torque. It would cost much more than that for a single turbo setup for same power including buying a car.
#279
RX 4BPT
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Huddersfield, England
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm looks like it could weigh less at the back. What about the front? It could have been that high at the rear because of these so called boat anchors on the front? the v8 section has got to be the best at the moment for crazy builds!!
#281
RX 4BPT
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Huddersfield, England
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#282
In the Air
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a link to v8 fd vs. a rotary fd on curb weight scales, "suprisingly" the v8 fd actually had a better 50/50 distribution. Boom! Case closed! Ponycars.Net - RX7 with LS1 motor
#283
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (83)
Here is a link to v8 fd vs. a rotary fd on curb weight scales, "suprisingly" the v8 fd actually had a better 50/50 distribution. Boom! Case closed! Ponycars.Net - RX7 with LS1 motor
#284
In the Air
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ I see your point, but its still a difference of almost 60lbs lighter up front with the v8, which isnt that bad, and I've seen modified motor mounts that allowed the Ls motor to sit lower in the engine bay. I'm not a rotary hater, i enjoy it very much and i've still got one in my fd, my fd is completely stock so im seriously considering not doing anything to it and keeping it original, i am however going to get a second fd when i get home from deployment, and it will be getting a v8.
Last edited by NorthWest7; 10-11-12 at 02:22 AM.
#285
Senior Member
Yank rotary, drop in LSx, keeping p/s and a/c, you will add weight to the front.
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
#286
Rallye RX7
iTrader: (11)
Yank rotary, drop in LSx, keeping p/s and a/c, you will add weight to the front.
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post