V-8 Weight nolonger a viable argument

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-12, 11:03 PM
  #276  
Junior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
revvingGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moorhead, MN
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happend to this section? haha I check in and there is pages and pages of threads!
On the topic of weight, I would bet that my nearly stock 5.3 has better power to weight ratio than my old 12a had. I wish I could weight the complete longblock before I stick it back in soon.
Old 09-12-12, 12:52 AM
  #277  
RX 4BPT
 
Grant M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Huddersfield, England
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has any one ever corner weighted a standard FD, a single turbo FD and a v8 swapped FD? There is a v8 swapped FD for sale for £11.5k really tempted by it, just short of 500 HP and torque. It would cost much more than that for a single turbo setup for same power including buying a car.
Old 09-12-12, 03:09 AM
  #278  
I can't see my car **(

iTrader: (16)
 
Ruler_Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,600
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I had these coilovers on a mostly stock 93 rx7, same wheel/tire it was slightly tucking the tire... on my stripped 93 with ls3 it did this..

V-8 Weight nolonger a viable argument-6cgv0l.jpg
Old 09-12-12, 04:39 AM
  #279  
RX 4BPT
 
Grant M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Huddersfield, England
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm looks like it could weigh less at the back. What about the front? It could have been that high at the rear because of these so called boat anchors on the front? the v8 section has got to be the best at the moment for crazy builds!!
Old 09-12-12, 11:31 AM
  #280  
I can't see my car **(

iTrader: (16)
 
Ruler_Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,600
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
ignore my post, we did the a arms upside down LOL
Old 09-12-12, 12:05 PM
  #281  
RX 4BPT
 
Grant M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Huddersfield, England
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ruler_Mark
ignore my post, we did the a arms upside down LOL
Ha, yeh I saw on your thread don't worry, first time I stripped my subframe and put it back in I got them the wrong way around
Old 10-09-12, 05:55 PM
  #282  
In the Air
iTrader: (1)
 
NorthWest7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is a link to v8 fd vs. a rotary fd on curb weight scales, "suprisingly" the v8 fd actually had a better 50/50 distribution. Boom! Case closed! Ponycars.Net - RX7 with LS1 motor
Old 10-09-12, 10:26 PM
  #283  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by NorthWest7
Here is a link to v8 fd vs. a rotary fd on curb weight scales, "suprisingly" the v8 fd actually had a better 50/50 distribution. Boom! Case closed! Ponycars.Net - RX7 with LS1 motor
Not quite. It's not only about weight but of center of gravity. The majority of the weight on the rotary sits pretty damn low. Also, you're comparing apples to oranges. If you want to compare the two, do it with a rotary car that is modified, not one that is stock. The rotary car still has emissions and PS/AC.
Old 10-11-12, 02:14 AM
  #284  
In the Air
iTrader: (1)
 
NorthWest7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ I see your point, but its still a difference of almost 60lbs lighter up front with the v8, which isnt that bad, and I've seen modified motor mounts that allowed the Ls motor to sit lower in the engine bay. I'm not a rotary hater, i enjoy it very much and i've still got one in my fd, my fd is completely stock so im seriously considering not doing anything to it and keeping it original, i am however going to get a second fd when i get home from deployment, and it will be getting a v8.

Last edited by NorthWest7; 10-11-12 at 02:22 AM.
Old 10-18-12, 09:44 AM
  #285  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Yank rotary, drop in LSx, keeping p/s and a/c, you will add weight to the front.
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
Old 10-18-12, 11:53 AM
  #286  
Rallye RX7

iTrader: (11)
 
fidelity101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MI/CHI
Posts: 2,403
Received 92 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by ZDan
Yank rotary, drop in LSx, keeping p/s and a/c, you will add weight to the front.
Every magazine-measured weight for the FD I've ever seen had it at 50/50 empty, 48/52 with driver and fuel. My LS2 FD with ps/ac weighed in at 51/49 with half a tank, 50.0/50.0 with driver and half tank of fuel. 2% more weight on the front wheels vs. stock.
The linked figures giving 53/47 for the stock weight distribution (with a nearly full tank!) don't jibe with any measurements I've ever seen for a stock FD.
Here's an R&T article giving 48/52 f/r distribution (almost certainly with driver and fuel): Road & Track: Track Test: The Best-Handling Sports Cars in America (March 1992)
I like how the NX was compared to all those other cars in there, that wasn't very fair lol.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MILOS7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
05-09-16 06:39 AM



Quick Reply: V-8 Weight nolonger a viable argument



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.