Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs
Sponsored by:

0-60 time est. 1/4??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-05, 10:07 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Camrann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort worth, TX
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation 0-60 time est. 1/4??

I have a 91 n/a, streetported, headerback exhaust, airintake, powersteering removed ac removed. Any ideas what 0-60 time and 1/4 time would be?
Old 03-12-05, 10:56 PM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Millville, NJ
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe 0-60 in 6.5 seconds..
Old 03-12-05, 10:59 PM
  #3  
neu
*** i love duct tape

 
neu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.5... jesus christ my n/a is a lot faster than that... and it's on stock ports
Old 03-12-05, 11:01 PM
  #4  
Lets rock.

 
flamin-roids's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could be anywhere from 5 seconds to 13 seconds. 5 seconds being the car is stripped completely with higher gear ratios and a good driver. 8-9 seconds for a close to factory wieght, bad tuning and a mediocre driver. 13 seconds if the motor is nearly dead and you have an auto.
Old 03-12-05, 11:04 PM
  #5  
Lets rock.

 
flamin-roids's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by neu
6.5... jesus christ my n/a is a lot faster than that... and it's on stock ports
So your N/A is faster than a TII on its stock ports? Please don't tell me you counted 1 mississippi 2 mississippi while watching the needle. And if its alot faster you're probably beating WRX's, S2000's, and 350z's.
Old 03-12-05, 11:05 PM
  #6  
neu
*** i love duct tape

 
neu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mines not stripped... has a little weight redux, stock ports, stock tranny, good driver, and im under 6.5... so wtf? on an s4 n/a
Old 03-12-05, 11:07 PM
  #7  
neu
*** i love duct tape

 
neu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no, i didnt count, lol, had a friend with a stop watch, which isnt really that accurate... but it wasnt 6.5... only thing different with the drive train is a newer tranny, mazdatrix shifter, t2 rear end
Old 03-12-05, 11:09 PM
  #8  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 6.5 0-60 is approximately 15.0 1/4 mile at sea level. On an N/A with stock port this IS possible depending on degree of weight reduction and mods. I hit 14.9 1/4 mile on stock port, but it took some work.
Old 03-12-05, 11:12 PM
  #9  
neu
*** i love duct tape

 
neu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all of my weight redux went to crap, because i had a friend in the car with me... it all started when i kept beating everyone in first and second... which is 0 - 60... so we had to test it out against a few cars, and eventually a few times with a stop watch
Old 03-12-05, 11:13 PM
  #10  
neu
*** i love duct tape

 
neu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but that was with the old SE tranny and open differential.. so who knows what would be different know with the newer stock tranny and TII rear end?
Old 03-15-05, 12:30 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Camrann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort worth, TX
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh yeah I forgot the engine, is just rebuilt, 8,000 miles on it, it got everything replaced and the transmission was just rebuilt as well. the gear ratios were a little changed I believe. Because I got up to 88 in 2nd at 8,000rpm and 110 in 3rd at 7000rpm and 8,000 is redline.
Old 03-15-05, 12:34 PM
  #12  
@ pipnorcali

 
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grass valley, ca
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i would say 14.2-14.8 if you can drive
Old 03-15-05, 12:56 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Camrann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort worth, TX
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SDrotary-FC
i would say 14.2-14.8 if you can drive
any idea about a 0-60 time?
Old 03-15-05, 01:02 PM
  #14  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
15.4. Sounds like whoever did your tranny killed your acceleration. Adding 20mph to second gear is pretty damn excessive.
Old 03-15-05, 01:31 PM
  #15  
wtf's a piston

 
gerbraldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd say 20mins 0-60
Old 03-15-05, 02:33 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Camrann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort worth, TX
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
15.4. Sounds like whoever did your tranny killed your acceleration. Adding 20mph to second gear is pretty damn excessive.
actually it accelerates very quickly, it goes 110 at redline not 7,000rpm** my fault, and that is only adding about 10mph as far as im concerned. n/a goes faster top end, less compression.
Old 03-15-05, 02:41 PM
  #17  
wtf's a piston

 
gerbraldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just go get a g-tech, their like $199 and they show you everything you want to know
Old 03-15-05, 05:33 PM
  #18  
Nothin But a G Thang

 
ajsuper7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with my old gtech i consistantly ran between 6.3 and 6.5 on several runs on a cool night with my 91 n/a (A options package), with a slipping clutch and bad throwout bearing. my car had a bonez racepipe, 2.5 inch catback with straight through mufflers, intake, msd ignition and no spare/jack and a few other needless items taken out. this was at sea level. it had a high milage engine but excellent compression. the car was in great mechanical condition and i would launch anywhere between 5.5 and 6.5k with good tires. although it was only a n/a it was pretty quick and could surprise quite a few ricers. died of pd failure/fire so until i finish rebuilding it im stuck with a 91 vert...auto
Old 03-15-05, 10:28 PM
  #19  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Doesn't matter how 'fast' it 'seems' to accelerate, by making 2nd hit 80 is going to slow it down from what it original was. Regardless, I still don't see much evidence that would get this car below 15's.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Tylerx7fb
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
39
05-27-19 12:45 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
04-23-16 06:37 PM
LMBTG
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
08-15-15 01:43 PM



Quick Reply: 0-60 time est. 1/4??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.