Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

0-60 time est. 1/4??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 10:07 PM
  #1  
Camrann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Fort worth, TX
Exclamation 0-60 time est. 1/4??

I have a 91 n/a, streetported, headerback exhaust, airintake, powersteering removed ac removed. Any ideas what 0-60 time and 1/4 time would be?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 10:56 PM
  #2  
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Millville, NJ
Maybe 0-60 in 6.5 seconds..
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 10:59 PM
  #3  
neu's Avatar
neu
*** i love duct tape
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
6.5... jesus christ my n/a is a lot faster than that... and it's on stock ports
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 11:01 PM
  #4  
flamin-roids's Avatar
Lets rock.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Utah
Could be anywhere from 5 seconds to 13 seconds. 5 seconds being the car is stripped completely with higher gear ratios and a good driver. 8-9 seconds for a close to factory wieght, bad tuning and a mediocre driver. 13 seconds if the motor is nearly dead and you have an auto.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 11:04 PM
  #5  
flamin-roids's Avatar
Lets rock.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Utah
Originally Posted by neu
6.5... jesus christ my n/a is a lot faster than that... and it's on stock ports
So your N/A is faster than a TII on its stock ports? Please don't tell me you counted 1 mississippi 2 mississippi while watching the needle. And if its alot faster you're probably beating WRX's, S2000's, and 350z's.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 11:05 PM
  #6  
neu's Avatar
neu
*** i love duct tape
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
mines not stripped... has a little weight redux, stock ports, stock tranny, good driver, and im under 6.5... so wtf? on an s4 n/a
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 11:07 PM
  #7  
neu's Avatar
neu
*** i love duct tape
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
no, i didnt count, lol, had a friend with a stop watch, which isnt really that accurate... but it wasnt 6.5... only thing different with the drive train is a newer tranny, mazdatrix shifter, t2 rear end
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
A 6.5 0-60 is approximately 15.0 1/4 mile at sea level. On an N/A with stock port this IS possible depending on degree of weight reduction and mods. I hit 14.9 1/4 mile on stock port, but it took some work.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 11:12 PM
  #9  
neu's Avatar
neu
*** i love duct tape
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
all of my weight redux went to crap, because i had a friend in the car with me... it all started when i kept beating everyone in first and second... which is 0 - 60... so we had to test it out against a few cars, and eventually a few times with a stop watch
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 11:13 PM
  #10  
neu's Avatar
neu
*** i love duct tape
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
but that was with the old SE tranny and open differential.. so who knows what would be different know with the newer stock tranny and TII rear end?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #11  
Camrann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Fort worth, TX
oh yeah I forgot the engine, is just rebuilt, 8,000 miles on it, it got everything replaced and the transmission was just rebuilt as well. the gear ratios were a little changed I believe. Because I got up to 88 in 2nd at 8,000rpm and 110 in 3rd at 7000rpm and 8,000 is redline.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #12  
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
@ pipnorcali
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Grass valley, ca
i would say 14.2-14.8 if you can drive
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 12:56 PM
  #13  
Camrann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Fort worth, TX
Originally Posted by SDrotary-FC
i would say 14.2-14.8 if you can drive
any idea about a 0-60 time?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 01:02 PM
  #14  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
15.4. Sounds like whoever did your tranny killed your acceleration. Adding 20mph to second gear is pretty damn excessive.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #15  
gerbraldy's Avatar
wtf's a piston
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
From: Englewood, FL
I'd say 20mins 0-60
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 02:33 PM
  #16  
Camrann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Fort worth, TX
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
15.4. Sounds like whoever did your tranny killed your acceleration. Adding 20mph to second gear is pretty damn excessive.
actually it accelerates very quickly, it goes 110 at redline not 7,000rpm** my fault, and that is only adding about 10mph as far as im concerned. n/a goes faster top end, less compression.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #17  
gerbraldy's Avatar
wtf's a piston
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
From: Englewood, FL
just go get a g-tech, their like $199 and they show you everything you want to know
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:33 PM
  #18  
ajsuper7's Avatar
Nothin But a G Thang
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
with my old gtech i consistantly ran between 6.3 and 6.5 on several runs on a cool night with my 91 n/a (A options package), with a slipping clutch and bad throwout bearing. my car had a bonez racepipe, 2.5 inch catback with straight through mufflers, intake, msd ignition and no spare/jack and a few other needless items taken out. this was at sea level. it had a high milage engine but excellent compression. the car was in great mechanical condition and i would launch anywhere between 5.5 and 6.5k with good tires. although it was only a n/a it was pretty quick and could surprise quite a few ricers. died of pd failure/fire so until i finish rebuilding it im stuck with a 91 vert...auto
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 10:28 PM
  #19  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Doesn't matter how 'fast' it 'seems' to accelerate, by making 2nd hit 80 is going to slow it down from what it original was. Regardless, I still don't see much evidence that would get this car below 15's.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Tylerx7fb
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
39
May 27, 2019 12:45 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM
LMBTG
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Aug 15, 2015 01:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM.