0-60 time est. 1/4??
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort worth, TX
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0-60 time est. 1/4??
I have a 91 n/a, streetported, headerback exhaust, airintake, powersteering removed ac removed. Any ideas what 0-60 time and 1/4 time would be?
#4
Lets rock.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could be anywhere from 5 seconds to 13 seconds. 5 seconds being the car is stripped completely with higher gear ratios and a good driver. 8-9 seconds for a close to factory wieght, bad tuning and a mediocre driver. 13 seconds if the motor is nearly dead and you have an auto.
#5
Lets rock.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by neu
6.5... jesus christ my n/a is a lot faster than that... and it's on stock ports
#7
*** i love duct tape
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no, i didnt count, lol, had a friend with a stop watch, which isnt really that accurate... but it wasnt 6.5... only thing different with the drive train is a newer tranny, mazdatrix shifter, t2 rear end
Trending Topics
#8
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 6.5 0-60 is approximately 15.0 1/4 mile at sea level. On an N/A with stock port this IS possible depending on degree of weight reduction and mods. I hit 14.9 1/4 mile on stock port, but it took some work.
#9
*** i love duct tape
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all of my weight redux went to crap, because i had a friend in the car with me... it all started when i kept beating everyone in first and second... which is 0 - 60... so we had to test it out against a few cars, and eventually a few times with a stop watch
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort worth, TX
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh yeah I forgot the engine, is just rebuilt, 8,000 miles on it, it got everything replaced and the transmission was just rebuilt as well. the gear ratios were a little changed I believe. Because I got up to 88 in 2nd at 8,000rpm and 110 in 3rd at 7000rpm and 8,000 is redline.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort worth, TX
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
15.4. Sounds like whoever did your tranny killed your acceleration. Adding 20mph to second gear is pretty damn excessive.
#18
Nothin But a G Thang
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
with my old gtech i consistantly ran between 6.3 and 6.5 on several runs on a cool night with my 91 n/a (A options package), with a slipping clutch and bad throwout bearing. my car had a bonez racepipe, 2.5 inch catback with straight through mufflers, intake, msd ignition and no spare/jack and a few other needless items taken out. this was at sea level. it had a high milage engine but excellent compression. the car was in great mechanical condition and i would launch anywhere between 5.5 and 6.5k with good tires. although it was only a n/a it was pretty quick and could surprise quite a few ricers. died of pd failure/fire so until i finish rebuilding it im stuck with a 91 vert...auto
#19
Super Raterhater
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Doesn't matter how 'fast' it 'seems' to accelerate, by making 2nd hit 80 is going to slow it down from what it original was. Regardless, I still don't see much evidence that would get this car below 15's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM