Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

Stock Time for FD???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 04:03 PM
  #1  
fd3s_rx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
From: Sac., CA
Stock Time for FD???

I was just wandering what is the stock 1/4 mile time for

a bone stock 1993 RX7 twin turbo, Touring Package.???

Any ideas? I was thinking high 13s to low 14s..

But just want specific time for it? Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #2  
EKTwin93's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 434
Likes: 2
From: Kansas City, MO
I've seen a lot of different times. (Everything from 13.5-14.0 ) Basically they run a solid 13.8 or faster. Key there is "or faster" 13.5 seems a little too fast but I wouldnt' doubt it with some incredible driver that has owned and driven the car for a few years. Just go to the track and found out... Evan
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 10:23 PM
  #3  
911GT2's Avatar
The Power of 1.3
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
I've seen stock times a little slower than that. 13.9-14.1 seem to be about the norm. Thats with a decent driver and a healthy car.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 12:52 AM
  #4  
beast's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: united kingdom
i would have though they would do sub 13's ok as my fwd car does 14.6 as std and has really bad traction!!!
managed to get that down to 13.795 with coilovers,k&n and a boost controller and would have been a bit quicker but had a knacked ***** and it was a really hot day!!i have a fiat coupe 20v turbo by the way!


beast
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 05:10 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
I think that it is about both the driver and the car.... I dont care who it is there is the human factor in every ride as long as we still are in cars and they are controlled by humans. I do think that driver improvements while harder should be addressed first and it is cheaper
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #6  
marix1521's Avatar
Turn on Tune in Drop out
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Right near da beach! OOOOEEEE!!!
I've heard as fast at 13.0 sec for the 1320 (1/4 mile) and and 5.0 sec 0-60. That's what Mazda rated them from the factory and Import Tuner also has claimed to have made those times. I wouldnt go as far as to say that if you buy a completely stock RX-7 right now it will do that, because 99% chance is that it wont. Age, mileage, condition and a lot of other things are going to make those times a bit slower. I wouldnt expect 1/4 mile anywhere past 14.9-15.5 sec for a completely stock car in good condition as of now. Just a guess though...
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 07:51 PM
  #7  
diablone's Avatar
.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 26
From: -
Originally posted by marix1521
I've heard as fast at 13.0 sec for the 1320 (1/4 mile) and and 5.0 sec 0-60. That's what Mazda rated them from the factory and Import Tuner also has claimed to have made those times. I wouldnt go as far as to say that if you buy a completely stock RX-7 right now it will do that, because 99% chance is that it wont. Age, mileage, condition and a lot of other things are going to make those times a bit slower. I wouldnt expect 1/4 mile anywhere past 14.9-15.5 sec for a completely stock car in good condition as of now. Just a guess though...
Didn't Import Tuner also claim FD's have full alluminium bodies? Shows how knowledgable a magazine like that is.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 11:04 PM
  #8  
academytim's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 638
Likes: 1
From: Pace, FL
Mazda rated the 1/4 mile at 13.5 seconds for an R1 model. All the magazine articles I have seen from 92 and 93 where testing was done show times of 14.0 to 14.2 on a stock 5spd touring. All I have are a downpipe and an intake, my car has 90,000 miles on the original engine and turbos, and I just ran a 13.8 my first time at the track. No way a stock 3rd gen is touching a 13.0...but a healthy running car is not going to be in the 15s either. I was trying a few different launching techniques to try to get the best time and bogged pretty bad once. It still ran mid 14s.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #9  
technonovice's Avatar
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
RX-7 Tests

Car & Driver February 1992 R1 tested
0-60 mph 1/4 mi Skidpad 5-60 mph
5.0 sec 13.7 sec .97g 6.0 sec

Motor Trend April 1992 R1 Tested
0-60 mph 1/4 mi Skidpad
5.2 sec 13.8 sec .98g

Road & Track April 1992 Touring Tested
0-60 mph 1/4 mi Skidpad
5.5 sec 14.0 sec .94g

Motor Trend July 1993 R1 Tested
0-60 mph 1/4 mi Skidpad
5.3 sec 13.9 sec .97g
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 10:38 PM
  #10  
BlackRX7Turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: NJ
I can't remember the magazine -- probably like import tuner or something...

the article said something about the guy doing a 13.5 in a bone stock RX-7...
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #11  
Sil's Avatar
Sil
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: North Olmsted, Ohio
I think that was in Turbo magazine. If I remember right they said it ran a 13.3 and it was Kevin Wymm's car. Then they took off the stock exhaust including the cats and ran a 12.8 w/o any kind of boost control, ecu reflash, or anything else. It was one of the first articles that got me to consider modding my 7.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2004 | 10:55 AM
  #12  
RX7UP's Avatar
BOYCOTT EXXON MOBIL!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,050
Likes: 0
From: USA
My stock 93 Touring has 24,000 miles and does 13.9... Absolutely no mods. Not even K&N.... I know, I know what am I waiting for........
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #13  
JoeRoa's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Chile - South America
13.6 seconds or 13.8s stock
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #14  
BIG J MIXALOT's Avatar
SHSHSHA POCKET SAND
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Monroe Wa
thats fast
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #15  
machinis's Avatar
Boricua
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Fernandina Beach, FL
My mechanic had one bone stock and ran a 13.7 @ ??? mph. Take in fact that he is a very good driver (has a full race FC running 7.8) and also the shitty weather down here.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #16  
fd3s_rx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
From: Sac., CA
okay,
just went to the track for the first time.

and I pulled 1/4 mile 13.817 at 104.008 mph.

My reaction was .949
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #17  
racerfoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Southwest Missouri
exhaust + non-seq @ 8-9lbs and i ran a 13.0 @ 106 with a 2.1 60ft.

oh, and i had a shiney intake hard pipe
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #18  
machinis's Avatar
Boricua
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Fernandina Beach, FL
Originally posted by racerfoo
exhaust + non-seq @ 8-9lbs and i ran a 13.0 @ 106 with a 2.1 60ft.

oh, and i had a shiney intake hard pipe
Are you serious? That's about all the mods I have on mine(+koyo Radiator and AVC-R), but i haven't taken it to the track yet. Hm...
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #19  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
From a japanese magazine, circa 91 (just before the sale debut of the FD). Note: weight of the 91 type I was 1250kg:

0-400m/0-100km/h
FD: 13.5/5.1
FC: 14.6/6.5
Soarer (v8): 15.2/7.4
NSX: 13.8/5.7
300zx: 14.4/6.3
GTO (3000GT): 13.3/5.1
R32 GTR: 13.8/5.6
911 carrera2: 13.7/5.6
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #20  
turborotarypower's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: south jersey
http://207.44.246.196/595/4/upload/p713.jpg

bone stock FD with issues and 8 psi of boost.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #21  
racerfoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Southwest Missouri
Originally posted by machinis
Are you serious? That's about all the mods I have on mine(+koyo Radiator and AVC-R), but i haven't taken it to the track yet. Hm...
when i say exhaust, i mean full exhaust. hks downpipe, hollow main cat, 3" catback.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: sugar land
ive read when some ppl run the 1/4 they sometimes end up blowing the engine or something goes wrong. If i push my stock touring fd will this happen and how can i prevent it?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Bone Stock i ran a 13.8 at 101mph but it only happened once i have been to the track since
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2004 | 03:53 AM
  #24  
cruiser's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
I really cant see a stock FD going sub 14secs with average driver. I was at drag competition yesterday and now have a better understanding what it means to run sub 14secs in an FD (ran 13.4 @ 106mph but at 13psi)
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:11 AM
  #25  
fdfanatic's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: coosbay, oregon
race exhaust(no cats) ,downpipe ,non-seq turbos,apexi intake, 100.00 ebay intercooler.


ran a 13.2 @ 104mph@ stock boost
r/t' .086
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.