Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes Archive  
Sponsored by:

The Official FC Wheel Fitment Thread

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-04, 12:13 AM
  #76  
Full Member

 
anobii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: va
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure (correct me if im wrong, please) but just from what I've seen around the shop here is when the aspect ratio decreases (say 60 to a 40) the tire width increases. Like for example I have a set of 225-60-16's that are 7 inches wide from tread edge to edge and a set of 215-40-17's that are 7.5 inches from edge to edge. At least with these two sets of tires there are two main benifits with useing the 17, 1: wider tire, more contact patch 2: lower profile tire (less camber, decreased tire roll) and 3: (could be good or bad) smaller diameter tire IE: less weight, shorter final drive gearing, and the ability to go lower with the suspension, but the speedo will be off.

On a side note the 225-60-16's on my car have rubbed 1/4" deep grooves on the inside of the tires on the front due to hard cornering, they didn't touch when the car was sitting still, so if your wheels/tire are really really close, remember that things change when everything is in motion.

E
anobii is offline  
Old 02-08-04, 12:26 AM
  #77  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i've thought about the possibility of my tires actually rubbing when cornering and such but don't remember seeing any evidence that there was contact. i never really looked for it but i think i'll take a gander tomorrow.
fstrnyou is offline  
Old 02-08-04, 09:56 AM
  #78  
Send me your BMX parts

 
raising arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Quartz Hill CA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Cheers: Pictures of what? 215's on 17? sorry can't help ya there.... I was just trying to help the others. If there into 215's up front its not my place or anyones place to tell them different.

You already have pictures of my car.
raising arizona is offline  
Old 02-08-04, 03:27 PM
  #79  
Send me your BMX parts

 
raising arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Quartz Hill CA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
disregard above reply. Two part reply's confuse me today
raising arizona is offline  
Old 02-08-04, 08:58 PM
  #80  
Full Member

 
dave90rx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: winterhaven,fl
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey guys need info....... Im mounting stock fd (16x8) with 225/50/16 toyo proxes on my fc they say i in need spacers in the front...... anyone know what size spacers i need any info would be helpful thanks again....
dave90rx is offline  
Old 02-08-04, 11:08 PM
  #81  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
http://fc3spro.com/TECH/FAQ/fdfit.html


-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 02-08-04, 11:28 PM
  #82  
S5 TII

iTrader: (1)
 
RyoFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know what kind of wheels these are? I dont like the car I found them on, but I do like the wheels. I looked for about 2 hours non stop and came up unsuccessful.



PS: I'm probably getting Falken Azenis(sp) 225/45's. Those fit, im pretty sure.
RyoFC3S is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 02:33 AM
  #83  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Rookie84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seoul, Republic of Korea
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Can't really tell from this angle, but looks like Regamaster Evos.

Ted, do you know where I can get spacers that are smaller than 5mm? Thanks a lot
Rookie84 is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 06:12 AM
  #84  
Senior Member

 
crickifur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ill stick with the 17" x 9" rear and 17" by 7.5 in the front. Its quite a difference but seems to work real well...
crickifur is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 10:05 AM
  #85  
Currently Winning

 
$150FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by anobii
I'm pretty sure (correct me if im wrong, please) but just from what I've seen around the shop here is when the aspect ratio decreases (say 60 to a 40) the tire width increases. Like for example I have a set of 225-60-16's that are 7 inches wide from tread edge to edge and a set of 215-40-17's that are 7.5 inches from edge to edge.

E
A 225/60/16 tire should be 225mm wide with a 135mm sidewall, and a 215/40/17 should be 215mm wide, with an 86mm sidewall. Are you sure you're reading the tires right? A 225 should always be wider than a 215, regardless of aspect ratio.
$150FC is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 08:31 PM
  #86  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Yeah, Regamaster EVO's to me too.

Summit Racing has them down to 5.5mm.
http://fc3spro.com/TECH/MODS/RT/rims.htm

You want something thinner than 5mm?


-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 10:20 PM
  #87  
S5 TII

iTrader: (1)
 
RyoFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


That great. The only problem is they're over $300, each.

A little above my budget. Any other ideas?

Thanks


Andrew
RyoFC3S is offline  
Old 02-09-04, 10:27 PM
  #88  
NA Powah, Every Hour!

 
RarestRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA, U S of A
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yo,


Hey, what's the center bore for our hubs? The adapters I just got say 59mm.

Is that right?

Kevin
1989 GTUs "Lazy!"
RarestRX is offline  
Old 02-10-04, 10:21 AM
  #89  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Rookie84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seoul, Republic of Korea
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally posted by RETed
Yeah, Regamaster EVO's to me too.

Summit Racing has them down to 5.5mm.
http://fc3spro.com/TECH/MODS/RT/rims.htm

You want something thinner than 5mm?


-Ted
Yeah, if I can get something thinner than 5mm, then that would be great. Thanks for the help, Ted

-Yohan
Rookie84 is offline  
Old 02-10-04, 04:19 PM
  #90  
Rotary Powered Since 1995

iTrader: (4)
 
daviddeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Potomac, MD
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Regarding hub center bore, my hubcentric adapter rings say 59.60 mm and they fit perfectly.
daviddeep is offline  
Old 02-11-04, 12:22 AM
  #91  
Full Member

 
anobii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: va
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay, I've dug a little and wish to share about tire sizeing. I was wrong about the width increasing as the aspect ratio decreases. I was using two different tire performance types to compare (all season vs ultra high performance). From what I have read, it is very possable to have a 215 wider than a 225, 235, and even as much as a 245 in extreme cases as far as tread width is concerned. Lets take a 225/50/16 for example. 225= the sectional width in mm, not tread width. 50= percentage of sectional with, or 225 x .50. and 16 is, well, you know what it is. Sectional width is the width of the tire from sidewall to sidewall at its widest point on a given rim. A friend a yokahama told me that there is NO standard for what rim size is used when calculating sectional width. Most manufacturers spec a 195-225 tire on a 6" wide rim, but that also changes with performance type. In other words if a 225 tire that was spec'd on a 6" rim was put on a 7" rim would yeild a sectional width of 235 and 245 on an 8" rim (10mm per inch) . But the tread width would not change. So in other words a 215 tire spec'd on a 6" rim and a 225 spec'd on a 7" rim could indeed have the same tread width, and pretty much in essence be the exact same tire size. Sidewall thickness is also an important point, as a thicker sidewall would not bulge as much, and in turn, make the tread width wider. Like a 225-40-16 bridgestone SO2 pole posistion would have a greater tread width than a 225-70-16 bridgestone turanza. So hey, maybe treadwidth can increase as the aspect ratio decreases, since the sidewall is stiffer on lower series tires. Anyway I now concider myself to be informed. I guess "wider" isn't always better.

-E
anobii is offline  
Old 02-11-04, 11:05 AM
  #92  
ISeeWhatYou'reDoingThere

 
autopilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my house.
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wondering. . .

I have an 86 base, 4 lug, and I'm looking at some 16x7 +40's. Anybody have this setup and what size tires would work to look good and have a safe clearance? They don't stick out any, do they? Or does somebody have a better setup? The 14's I have on there now are definitely too small, but 17's look abit too big to me.
autopilot is offline  
Old 02-11-04, 11:13 AM
  #93  
Ihre Papieren, Bitte?

iTrader: (1)
 
Wanked_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Communist IL
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
16x7 +40 is the stock rim size of the Turbo II. You can fit 205/55/16, and sometimes 225/50/16 depending on the tire.
Wanked_FC is offline  
Old 02-11-04, 03:48 PM
  #94  
Senior Member

 
S13 Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RETed

As a side note, I checked out a guy who was running some R32 Skyline GT-R rims which are like 16" x 8" +27 (offset I think), but he's running a 195 wide tire on those things!  I just kinda shook my head...



-Ted
32 gtr's are 16x8+30

just curious as to why you disapprove of streaching tires?
S13 Slide is offline  
Old 02-11-04, 07:39 PM
  #95  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Erie,pa 16503
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GOOD THREAD !
I Was Wondering , I have 4 new 215 x 50 x 17" tires ,(Feebees)
I Thought that id Replace the mint stock 15" & buy some 17" x 7" 5 x 114.3 , (offset ??) wheels to put on my stock 1990 FC GXL .. Any fit Issues with these tires or wheels ??
Thank's in advance ...
ZoomZoom2ndGen is offline  
Old 02-11-04, 10:35 PM
  #96  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Rookie84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seoul, Republic of Korea
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
17X7" +40 will work perfectly with 215s.
Rookie84 is offline  
Old 02-12-04, 12:46 AM
  #97  
Full Member

 
anobii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: va
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, I second that.

-E
anobii is offline  
Old 02-12-04, 07:17 AM
  #98  
Send me your BMX parts

 
raising arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Quartz Hill CA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by RETed

As a side note, I checked out a guy who was running some R32 Skyline GT-R rims which are like 16" x 8" +27 (offset I think), but he's running a 195 wide tire on those things! I just kinda shook my head...



-Ted




Ya, I don't understand that either. I would much rather stretch a tire on a wider wheel. It handles really great.

I had a 255 on a 17 x 9.5 (now) 275-40 on the back...It was great
raising arizona is offline  
Old 02-12-04, 07:53 AM
  #99  
Senior Member

 
Grimlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
got my rims...

they are adr kasai (silver)

18x8 +32 (225/35/18)

18x9 +35 (265/35/18)

just want to thank you guys for you help w/offsets. as soon as i get them mounted i will get some pics for you guys. im hoping it looks tight =)
Grimlock is offline  
Old 02-12-04, 12:23 PM
  #100  
Send me your BMX parts

 
raising arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Quartz Hill CA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Those will look real nice!
raising arizona is offline  


Quick Reply: The Official FC Wheel Fitment Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 PM.