Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

track/autox suspension setup...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 09:22 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
track/autox suspension setup...

setting up a track fd over the winter and now i am pretty confused on a suspension setup. this will be my first season so i want something that will be slightly inexpensive but still handle well. i was originally looking into coilovers but after searching and reading some of howard colemans post i think i may go with a shock/spring setup. i am thinking of either bilsteins or koni yellows, and tien s tech springs ( f rate 426 r rate 324 ). i know most track cars run close to 500 front and 450 rear spring rates. also looking possibly at the ground control coilovers. as for tires i am planning on running nitto nt-01's based on the price and they are well compared to the ra-1's. also i was reading that removing the rear sway bar may be better in track events. but needed for autox to slightly oversteer more. any imput on what i should do is greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 09:23 AM
  #2  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
btw this will pretty much be a track only car.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #3  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
My suggestion:

* Koni shocks
* Ground Control coilovers (you can later get a few springs to adjust for various events) Tein S-Tech springs are a good starting point if you don't want to shell out the extra cash for the GC's just yet.
* Widefoot Billet Swaybar mounts

As far as swaybars, I would leave them stock for now. As you get more seat time, the Tri-point adjustable sway bars would be a good upgrade.

Nitto NT-01 is a good tire. If they have your sizes, that's a good pick.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
thanks mahjik, on the tires note i am looking at a set of 5zigen 17x9 all around. issue is that they are +37. so on the front it will be tight. i plan on rolling the fenders. btw tire size is 255 40 17.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #5  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by smg944
thanks mahjik, on the tires note i am looking at a set of 5zigen 17x9 all around. issue is that they are +37. so on the front it will be tight. i plan on rolling the fenders. btw tire size is 255 40 17.
If that's what you plan to run, I would encourage going the Ground Control route. You'll want and need that extra adjustability with those tire sizes and rim offset.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 11:24 AM
  #6  
Eggie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: 15143
Talk with Rishie about the Enkei RPF1s in 17x9 +45. The only drawback is that they are too tight for some big brakes.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
how is the staggered offset? handling wise vs. the all around. i know that it will reduce oversteer, but every car is different. i was looking on the nitto website and they make a 275 40 17. just want some opinion...
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #8  
NeoTuri's Avatar
The shy megalomaniac
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 881
Likes: 79
From: Atlanta, GA
275/40 is a tall tire...

I have GC + Koni yellows, and the spring rates (700fr/500rr) allow me to set the ride height pretty close to 25".
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #9  
apex_7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Sorry for the hijack, but could someone point me in the direction of why to use the spring/strut setup over a full coilover? I just really don't understand the benefit. Thanks,

-Tony
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #10  
Bunchies's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by apex_7
Sorry for the hijack, but could someone point me in the direction of why to use the spring/strut setup over a full coilover? I just really don't understand the benefit. Thanks,

-Tony
It's cheaper, you have more control over the spring rates, and you can usually get better dampers that you don't get in a full coilover setup. This is assuming you are using the "JDM YO" coilovers. For instance, I'd rather run Bilsteins with some springs rather than JIC coilovers.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 08:02 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
i looked into the enkei's and they seem like a good choice. i will keep the 17x9 all around with a 255 40 17 tire.

neo, 700f 500r spring rate seems pretty high or is that normal for a track setup?

Last edited by smg944; Oct 23, 2007 at 08:10 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #12  
Eggie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: 15143
Originally Posted by smg944
neo, 700f 500r spring rate seems pretty high or is that normal for a track setup?
That's more of an autocross setup, since the stiff springs allow the car to react more quickly. This will be difficult to handle for drivers with less experience! Some people build track cars with very stiff springs, but this is probably better for cars with real downforce (e.g. Brad Barber's old FD).

Because softer springs increase grip, you'll need to find a compromise between ride-height and stiffness. The springs need to be stiff enough to keep the car from bottoming too often. Any stiffer is too much or should be used to lower your ride height.

But you're building a lapping-day car, not a racing car, right? Start with proven, conservative pieces. Use springs around 400-500F/300-400R, and set corner weights with ride height around 25.5". Once you get familiar with that setup and know how you'd like to change the handling, people will be able to suggest particular parts to get there.

Final point: on a limited budget, a stock suspension will get you farther than a stock radiator, brake pads or swaybar mounts. Spend wisely.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
yes for now i am building a lap day car. maybe in the future i will go for racing events. i would like to get seat time and get a good feel for everything. thanks to all for the imput.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #14  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by smg944
yes for now i am building a lap day car. maybe in the future i will go for racing events. i would like to get seat time and get a good feel for everything.
If you go with the Enkei's and a decent offset, you can use the Tein S-Tech's matched with Koni's. That would give you a good setup which will last you for a while. I'm currently tracking on Tokicos with Tein S-Techs. Granted, I only had a few sessions before I blew my motor, but they felt really good. Koni is a better shock so your setup should be real nice if you go that direction.

Wait until you can out-drive the suspension before upgrading. Too many people try to get a top of the line setup before their driving skills are at the same level. While it sounds like a good idea to have something to "grow into", it can actually be a bad thing. The closer you put the car to that edge, the less feedback you get from the car to let you know how close to that edge you are getting.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
yea thats what i am thinking mahjik. i may even go with bilsteins for now just to save a few $$. when it comes time i will upgrade to the koni/ ground control setup. from doing more seaching the koni/gc setup seems to be best and a more advanced setup.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #16  
Eggie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: 15143
I'd spend the extra for Konis now. The GC upgrade will be a lot cheaper next year.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Postman09
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.