Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

Please explain to me the differences in offsets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-02, 01:37 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please explain to me the differences in offsets

OK....when people talk about rims, the word "offsets" always there. So what is the differences in the 38...40....44...50 ... +....-.....all that . What changes in the wheels when the "offsets" change. Is it refer to how deep the lip of the rim??
Max, or sleepyR1 please explain to me.
Please don't tell me to search cause I did.
Thanks
Mike
Old 10-25-02, 01:41 AM
  #2  
1993 RX7 R1

 
Mr. Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
go read Steve Ciriani's website
Lightning in a world of thunder
Explains all
Old 10-25-02, 03:28 AM
  #3  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
You know how they make wheel spacers that you can mount between the wheel and the hub? Those are for adjusting what I guess you'd call the "effective" offset. Wheels themselves have different amounts of offset built in. A wheel with zero offset would have that mouting surface in the exact center of the wheel. It would be in the middle of the tread if you were looking down on the wheel from the top. Moving that surface toward the outside of the wheel moves you into positive offset, moving toward the inside would be negative offset. Wheels that have an offset that isn't positive enough (e.g. you have a +20 wheel, but a +50 would fit better) will tend to stick out of the fenders.

Offset is not a measure of the depth of the lip because that isn't a very useful thing to measure precisely -- it is an aesthetic concern rather than an engineering/fitment concern. But, having a less positive offset would tend to increase the depth of the lip. For instance, if you have two of the same wheel except that one is +50 and the other is +25, the +25 wheel is likely to have a deeper lip.

There is a wheel fitment form on http://www.fikse.com/ that shows a bunch of useful wheel dimensions, including offset.

-Max
Old 10-25-02, 03:30 AM
  #4  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Also, be careful in converting between backspacing and offset. It is a pretty straightforward calculation, but wheels are always larger than their nominal bead width. For instance, a 10" wide wheel is really anywhere from 10.5" - 11.25" wide. Backspacing is relative to the real width of the wheel.

-Max
Old 10-25-02, 07:01 AM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Max...

Excellent description Max!
Old 10-25-02, 08:07 AM
  #6  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
Originally posted by maxcooper
Also, be careful in converting between backspacing and offset. It is a pretty straightforward calculation, but wheels are always larger than their nominal bead width. For instance, a 10" wide wheel is really anywhere from 10.5" - 11.25" wide. Backspacing is relative to the real width of the wheel.

-Max
THIS is the really valuable info here. It took a bit for me to catch on to this. It really is a shame there isn't some sort of standardization, so that a 9" wheel is 9" and there'd be no doubt as to how it would fit.

Its almost as silly as the tire size numbers!
Old 10-25-02, 06:52 PM
  #7  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Max, for a detailed answer
Old 10-25-02, 08:33 PM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally posted by ptrhahn
THIS is the really valuable info here. It took a bit for me to catch on to this. It really is a shame there isn't some sort of standardization, so that a 9" wheel is 9" and there'd be no doubt as to how it would fit.
Actually, the dimensions are fixed and unchanging.&nbsp Most of the "metric world" uses "offset", which the U.S. still likes to use "backspacing" (especially in NASCAR/circle track/dirt track racing).&nbsp I do have a quick graphic representation on my website:&nbsp http://fc3s-pro.com/TECH/MODS/RT/rims.htm


Its almost as silly as the tire size numbers!
Actually, it's the inconsistent tire sizes that screw everything up.&nbsp Rim sizes and specs are unchanging, no matter what part of the world you're in; offset and backspacing are easily converted with simple math.&nbsp Due to difference in tire contruction, you get varying answers to rim/tire combos...



-Ted
Old 10-25-02, 09:10 PM
  #9  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Ted,

I think he was talking about actual rim width versus bead width. 8.5" wheels are never really 8.5" wide, so it complicates the conversion between backspacing and offset. The thing is that they are standard -- 8.5" wheels have a bead width that is 8.5" wide. That is what matters for mounting tires. Avoiding contact with springs and suspension components is a separate issue. Perhaps the bead width and actual width should both be specified.

Cool diagram. All of the dimensions are very clear on there except PCD. PCD might be a little confusing for patterns with odd numbers of bolts. Measuring between two bolt centers won't give you the right dimensions on a 5-bolt wheel. I realize it is just an illustration, but the potential for confusion is there. That's a minor nit, though. The diagram is great -- much more clear than other ones I have seen.

-Max
Old 10-26-02, 12:20 AM
  #10  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (22)
 
ARD T2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,775
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Max,

I was going to detail this out on our website and should be up in the next couple weeks. When converting backspacing to printed wheel widths and offsets it can be tricky.

I figured our discrepancy out Max. I used a caliper to measure the width and it was inset a bit in comparison to your measurement of the outer rim lip edge to the edge of the inner rim lip edge.

The diagram is cool and the one most commonly seen. However they do not detail the two points on the wheel from which they measure offset and what the actual wheel width is.

What max is saying is one may have 10" of total spacing and one would assume you can purchase a 10" wheel, but that is not true because the wheels overall width will actually be a good inch larger edge to edge. So this must be taken into consideration and subtracted from the front and backspacing to arrive at what wheel size and offset you should buy.

I'll will post the formula tommorrow for how I convert total "real" spacing to "printed" wheel widths and offsets. I'm trying to use lamen's terms as much as possible.

Gotta hang with the woman now. Not supposed to be on the computer.

Rishie
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM



Quick Reply: Please explain to me the differences in offsets



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.